2026-01-04 23:25:50

From a technical perspective, it is wiser to choose those cryptocurrencies that have a longer market lifecycle but have recently gained popularity due to hype. These assets typically have a large number of long-term holders who may not closely monitor short-term price fluctuations. From a chart technical pattern perspective, cryptocurrencies that have undergone multiple consolidation cycles are often more worth paying attention to—such patterns usually indicate a more robust trend continuation. Compared to charts that show a continuous upward movement, those with a history of sufficient retracements contain stronger fundamental support.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

22 Likes

Reward
22
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CryptoSurvivor

· 01-07 20:24

Bro, what you said makes sense. I never touch coins that are repeatedly shaken out at the bottom. The old coins that have survived several bear markets are the ones truly worth paying attention to. Long-term holders are proof of accumulated chips.

View OriginalReply0

CafeMinor

· 01-07 16:19

It's a common saying, but it's true. Only coins that have survived multiple rounds of adjustments are solid.

View OriginalReply0

Anon32942

· 01-04 23:55

Basically, don't chase new coins; focus on those that have been around for several years and are still going strong, with a solid foundation.

View OriginalReply0

NeverPresent

· 01-04 23:55

That's right, old coins that have survived multiple bear markets are indeed more reliable than those skyrocket air coins. --- Coins that repeatedly confirm their bottom are more daring to go all-in than those that just surge. --- It feels like a steady accumulation phase is more valuable than an exciting pump phase, but who listens to this during a bull market... --- Long-term holders are not worried about short-term fluctuations, referring to those coins that have experienced going from heaven to hell and climbing back—there's real value there. --- Yes, having a history of adjustments definitely gives confidence. Compared to those wild coins that never pull back, this kind is truly supported by others. --- Multiple rounds of consolidation are building a bottom; charts will tell the story, but the premise is sufficient liquidity. --- This argument is valid, but it also depends on the cycle. Even the most stable coin in a bear market will fall; the key is still the buying point.

View OriginalReply0

CodeAuditQueen

· 01-04 23:52

That's true, but it depends on the audit report. For those coins that have undergone multiple rounds of restructuring, is there real technological accumulation behind them? Or are they just supported by the faith of long-term holders?

View OriginalReply0

SerumSqueezer

· 01-04 23:51

That's right, established coins are indeed more resilient. Those that have gone through multiple consolidation rounds are much more reliable than a single large bullish candle of a new coin.

View OriginalReply0

DAOTruant

· 01-04 23:50

That's right, older cryptocurrencies are indeed more resistant to manipulation, and having too many retail investors makes it easier to be exploited.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationTherapist

· 01-04 23:36

That's right, old coins are still attractive. The underlying holdings are very stable, and only those who don't follow the hype can survive until now.

View OriginalReply0