Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 30+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
Token buyback has traditionally been a common strategy for many projects during periods of price decline. The sluggish market conditions coupled with investor pressure have led project teams to spend real money to buy back their own tokens in the market, attempting to stabilize the price.
However, recently the trend has shifted. The Helium project team has started to reconsider this strategy and even announced the abandonment of their buyback plans. The underlying logic is not complicated—project teams' funds are also shrinking. When costs for investment, development, and operations are depleting reserves, allocating funds for token buybacks becomes a somewhat luxurious choice.
This reflects a real issue: not all projects can sustain aggressive token buyback strategies indefinitely. During market downturns, project teams need to find a balance between maintaining the ecosystem and preserving cash reserves. Some projects choose buybacks to soothe the market, while others are forced to adjust their strategies and allocate resources more rationally. This change also serves as a reminder to investors not to overly rely on project buybacks to support prices—sustainable project development and genuine use cases are the long-term foundations.
Really? I’m increasingly skeptical of those projects that are still aggressively repurchasing.
Helium’s approach actually seems more honest, much more comfortable than those hard-talking projects.
Wait, is this hinting that many projects are actually out of money?
Buybacks are essentially just psychological comfort; the key is whether there’s real application support underneath.
Stop expecting project teams to rescue the market all the time. Instead of speculating on that, it’s better to focus on the fundamentals.
Has anyone tracked what happened to projects that abandoned buybacks?
Actually, this is the market’s self-purification process. If you can’t play, don’t pretend. That’s the healthy way.
Helium's recent moves are actually honest, better than those who keep stubbornly holding on.
To put it simply, if the money is gone, there's no need to pretend; the true skill is in sustaining the ecosystem.
---
Helium's recent move is quite honest; no more pretending, they just admit defeat. Much better than those still stubbornly holding on.
---
Basically, it's because they have no money. No matter how aggressively they boasted before, now they have to bow their heads and behave.
---
Wait, what happened to all those projects that previously promoted buybacks? Are they still pretending? Haha.
---
Really, stop blindly trusting buybacks. They're just a smoke screen. Having a real product is the most important thing.
---
Talking about tight funding in such a tactful way—just say there's no money left, and it's all over.
---
This is what Web3 should look like. Admitting mistakes is always better than continuing to deceive investors.
---
Laughable. Where did all those "unlimited buyback" promises go now?
---
Instead of relying on buybacks, it's better to see how long the project can survive. That’s the real indicator.
Genuine application and real returns are the way to go. Prices driven up by throwing money around will eventually collapse.
Helium was actually honest this time, which is better than those false alarms.
Once funded, they should focus on survival, rather than relying entirely on retail investors to take the hit.
It's just another story of a liquidity crunch forcing a change of tone.
This decision by Helium is actually wise; the money saved can be used more effectively.
If the project team has no money, they shouldn't keep pretending. Instead of buybacks, they should focus on real work.
Stop being fooled by buybacks. What's more important is to see what the project is actually doing.