2025-12-31 03:00:32

#战略性加仓BTC $SQD as a representative project in the ZK-based data indexing track, has recently been at a bit of a disadvantage—other new stars in the same track are quickly attracting attention, and the dispersed funds have led to a significant decline in buying support.

After the previous rapid surge, the trading volume couldn't keep up, and whenever it touched the resistance level above, it started to pull back. This is a very normal trend.

I built a position around 0.108, but is this price level really the peak? The key is to watch the on-chain large holders' inflow and outflow actions. Who is selling, who is buying, the data will tell.

Continue to hold and wait for the next signal.

BTC-1.88%

SQD-2.54%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

InfraVibes

· 01-02 09:43

The funding situation is too fragmented, and SQD has indeed been marginalized in this wave. Trading volume says it all.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainWorker

· 01-01 11:53

Failing to win the game and losing everything, SQD was indeed diverted this time, what a pity.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainBouncer

· 01-01 03:38

The track is crowded with similar projects, and the funds are too scattered. The 0.108 level is actually quite good; it all depends on when the big players start accumulating.

View OriginalReply0

DeFi_Dad_Jokes

· 2025-12-31 21:59

Why is this SQD so disappointing? The trading volume is more outrageous than the last. The guys who bought in at 0.108 must be feeling really frustrated now.

View OriginalReply0

RugResistant

· 2025-12-31 03:29

ngl the volume divergence here is sus... classic pump setup where retail fomo'd but whales already took profits. need to dig deeper into those on-chain wallets before making moves, not just staring at the chart bounce

Reply0

ContractHunter

· 2025-12-31 03:28

With such poor trading volume, are you still willing to invest? I think SQD was targeted by big funds. The competition within the sector is too fierce; we need to wait for major investors to genuinely support the market.

View OriginalReply0

VitalikFanboy42

· 2025-12-31 03:26

SQD this wave does feel a bit squeezed, with funds flowing into those newly hyped things... The 0.108 price level wasn't a late entry, but the key still depends on the moves of the big players; they are the real market indicators.

View OriginalReply0

WenMoon

· 2025-12-31 03:24

Haha, SQD really got hit this time. The capital is too dispersed, and the competition within the sector is too fierce.

View OriginalReply0

GameFiCritic

· 2025-12-31 03:22

When trading volume can't support the resistance level, a pullback is inevitable—this is textbook-level movement... However, the scattered track of SQD is really a bit annoying, with a lot of homogenized competition, making it easy for new concept projects to steal the spotlight. Do you clearly understand the logic behind building a position at 0.108? Or are you purely relying on the behavior of large on-chain holders? That's the key.

View OriginalReply0