Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
How did Kaito Launchpad perform in 2025? Data shows that a total of 14 new projects were launched last year. Among them, 3 projects have not yet undergone TGE, namely Espresso, Billions, and Rise.
Looking at the performance, it's a bit disappointing. So far, only LMTS, ZKP, and CHECK have prices still above their ICO prices. LMTS performed the best among them, while PLAI had the worst performance on the first day, and overall, XNL performed the weakest.
This set of data reflects a quite obvious differentiation phenomenon among Launchpad projects last year. Very few projects maintained prices above ICO levels, with most facing a breakdown in value. For users interested in new projects, this is also a reminder — the risk factor of Launchpad projects remains high, and choosing the right projects and timing is crucial.
The wave of price drops is coming; it still depends on luck and timing.
LMTS stands out alone, while others are swimming in blood.
Launchpad gambling attributes are becoming stronger; choosing wrong means heavy losses.
Three haven't even had TGE yet; they might also end up being casualties.
Instead of chasing new projects, it's better to focus on those that have already proven themselves; the risks are too high.
PLAID had a crash on the first day; this is a textbook example of a negative case.
11 projects experienced a price drop; the ratio is a bit terrifying. Newbies, wake up.
ZKP can stay stable, which is good, but this is just a minority.
PLAI crashed on its first day, lessons must be learned.
Wait, what about those 3 projects that haven't had TGE yet? Their future seems to be the real key.
How do the veterans choose? Can they really make a profit?
LMTS has held up pretty well, but overall, it's truly a game of life and death.
Break-even becoming the norm, this is the real picture of current launchpads.
14 projects a year, and only a few survive in the end. These numbers need to wake us up.
Honestly, relying on luck rather than skill is best avoided
LMTS is indeed impressive this time, but as for the others... sigh
Another bloody lesson; choosing the wrong project really turns into a slaughterhouse
Rather than trusting Launchpad, it's better to do your own research and pick projects
With such a high break rate, who still dares to go all in
Brothers, don't be fooled by hype; the risks are written all over it
With such aggressive breakdowns, the LMTS team really made a profit, while the others are all lessons learned.
PLAI performed poorly on its first day; I don't touch such projects. If the timing is just a little off, it's all over.
I predicted that XNL would be the weakest; choosing projects really depends on luck.
By the way, can these three projects that haven't had their TGE save the day, or will it continue to be stories of bagholders?