California's new proposal has caused quite a stir in the crypto community. The proposed policy targets billionaires with net assets exceeding billion, planning to impose a 5% wealth tax to fund healthcare and state assistance programs.



Upon hearing this news, industry leaders in the crypto space couldn't stay silent. Voices from the industry, including Hunter Horsley, CEO of Bitwise; Nic Carter, founding partner of Castle Island Ventures; and Jesse Powell, co-founder of Kraken, have all expressed opposition.

The logic behind this is straightforward: for entrepreneurs and investors who already pay taxes at the federal level, a state-level wealth tax means double taxation. For the crypto industry, such policies could influence the strategic decisions of large project developers and institutional investors in California. Of course, supporters of the policy believe it is a necessary measure to reduce the wealth gap. Regardless, the game between policy and industry will continue.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
ChainProspector
· 01-01 02:57
Here comes another round of harvesting the little guys, California's move is really outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
StakeWhisperer
· 2025-12-31 19:50
The double taxation scheme is really clever. Big players are about to run away.
View OriginalReply0
AirDropMissed
· 2025-12-31 19:11
Here comes the harvest again, California's move is truly top-notch.
View OriginalReply0
probably_nothing_anon
· 2025-12-31 03:00
Once the 5% wealth tax in California is implemented, the big players are directly outraged. The issue of double taxation is indeed frustrating. But to be fair, these wealthy elites have been moving to Texas and Miami for quite some time. As for those who stay in California, well, that's just how it is.
View OriginalReply0
blockBoy
· 2025-12-29 03:41
I really can't understand what California is thinking with this double taxation. It's clearly just trying to push people away.
View OriginalReply0
screenshot_gains
· 2025-12-29 03:39
Double taxation? Isn't this just a disguised form of confiscation? No wonder the big shots are getting anxious.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-afe07a92
· 2025-12-29 03:36
Here comes the usual pump and dump again. California's tactics are really clever.
View OriginalReply0
CrossChainMessenger
· 2025-12-29 03:32
Double taxation? That's outrageous. California is trying to drive people away.
View OriginalReply0
ForkTongue
· 2025-12-29 03:30
Here comes another round of cutting leeks; California's approach is also top-notch.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsDetective
· 2025-12-29 03:16
Here comes again to take from the rich, California's approach is truly unique

---

Double taxation? Isn't this outright robbery? No wonder the big shots are all complaining

---

Jesse Powell speaks so confidently, I like it

---

5% sounds not much, but this is just the beginning

---

Does California really want to drive all the big players out?

---

The gap between the rich and the poor needs to be narrowed, but this method... is indeed a bit outrageous

---

Hunter Horsley and others have a point in opposing, but supporters are not entirely talking nonsense

---

This move has directly turned California into an enemy of the public

---

Wait, can this policy really pass? I feel it might be sued to death

---

Basically, everyone has their reasons, and it’s endless
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin