The core team of the cross-chain bridging protocol deBridge recently raised a noteworthy concern. When the Flow chain decided to execute a blockchain rollback, there was no prior sufficient communication with key ecosystem parties such as bridging providers and exchanges. Such unilateral decision-making could pose systemic risks more severe than the original vulnerability—deBridge, as one of Flow's main cross-chain bridges, was already at a final state when notified.

The chain reaction caused by the rollback should not be underestimated. Assets of cross-chain users may face duplication issues, and deposit reconciliation has become a practical problem. This means that users and ecosystem participants relying on cross-chain services could fall into asset confusion. When a public chain makes a major decision, the participation of ecosystem stakeholders directly affects the network's stability. Relying solely on technical rollback measures, without ecosystem coordination, could instead complicate the problem.