Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Futures Kickoff
Get prepared for your futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to experience risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently, I've been looking into some infrastructure projects that haven't been fully explored yet and have noticed an interesting phenomenon: the bottlenecks of many public chains are not at the performance ceiling, but rather stem from the initial choice of execution model being off track.
Some time ago, I revisited a Layer1 solution that focuses on native parallel execution, and this technical approach is quite clear. The V4 testnet has already gone live, but to be honest, the community's enthusiasm isn't very high, and there aren't many discussions.
From an investment research perspective, I am particularly interested in these points: Does the architecture design of the execution model truly fit the current application ecosystem? How much actual performance improvement does the native parallel execution scheme have compared to traditional sequential execution? Can the testnet data support the performance after mainnet deployment? These are all critical factors in determining whether it can truly become the cornerstone of the next round of infrastructure.