2025-12-25 12:29:44

The bear market is here, and saving money isn't just about protecting funds; transaction fees also need to be carefully calculated💰

Recently, I switched my main trading tool to a certain leading wallet, and I've gained a lot from the trial. The fees can indeed be saved—compared to other mainstream platforms on the market, this one has significantly lower rates, and a rough estimate shows savings of over 50%. For high-frequency traders or those handling large amounts, this fee saving is quite substantial.

The experience on the SOL chain is even more worth mentioning. Recently, they optimized performance on the SOL chain, and transaction speeds are really smooth. When dealing with large amounts, slippage control is quite good, and the wear and tear are barely noticeable. In a bear market, every percentage point of cost matters, and such tools can definitely help.

SOL0.44%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

digital_archaeologist

· 2h ago

Save 50% on fees? I have to try it. The small coins I hold are being eaten up by fees every day, and it's really frustrating.

View OriginalReply0

ForkItAll

· 2h ago

Well, the SOL chain does have good slippage control, but the key still depends on your trading frequency. Saving 50% on fees is only felt by big players; for us retail investors, it's better to use the saved money to buy the dip. Wait, how does this wallet perform on other chains? Don't just focus on SOL alone. In a bear market, being meticulous is correct, but don't just think about fees—slippage and speed, which one is truly more problematic? Honestly, the most annoying part of changing wallets is the migration cost. Whether it's worth it or not depends on your own calculations. Fast speed is good, but the question is whether security has been compromised. That's what I care about most. Feels like we're being cut again; all these performance optimizations are just tricks. Being able to lower fees by 50% is the real skill.

View OriginalReply0

RumbleValidator

· 2h ago

Save 50% on fees? Show me the data, how is it calculated? Has the node stability been verified on the SOL side? What's the mechanism behind such low slippage?

View OriginalReply0

QuietlyStaking

· 2h ago

Save 50% on fees? I have to try it. Recently, the fees have really been hurting me. Is the slippage control on the SOL chain this aggressive? It feels a bit exaggerated. Saving a little on fees is a little, surviving in a bear market is already good. Sounds good, but the real experience might not be as ideal. High-frequency traders must be feeling the pain.

View OriginalReply0

FlatlineTrader

· 2h ago

Bear market bottoming requires careful planning. Isn't it better to save on transaction fees and use that money to increase your position? High-frequency traders really need to try different tools. A 50% fee difference is no small matter. SOL chain slippage control is so good? Then I need to test it out.

View OriginalReply0

GetRichLeek

· 2h ago

Can you save 50% on fees during a bear market? Bro, I don't believe you. The last time I changed wallets, I thought the same, but I still got slippage to death haha.

View OriginalReply0

ContractCollector

· 2h ago

Save 50% on fees? Sounds good, but I've been using the SOL chain recently, and the slippage experience is indeed smooth. Just don't know how long they can last.

View OriginalReply0