2025-12-24 22:21:30

There is renewed discussion about Dogecoin in the community. Some analyses predict that if everything goes smoothly, it could reach $0.4 in 2026, challenge $0.65 in 2027, and hit $1 only with "large-scale global adoption." Sounds quite tempting—the integration of Layer2, expansion into DeFi, and a shift toward eco-friendly consensus, the picture looks very appealing.

But the more I look, the more I stay calm.

Because there's an unavoidable issue: Dogecoin has a fixed annual issuance of 5 billion coins. This is not a possibility; it's a certainty. Like a water tank with a constant leak, no matter how much new capital flows in, the hole must be filled first. In the long run, this built-in, rigid inflation pressure will continue to erode asset value.

From another perspective, investing in "value" on an asset that dilutes itself automatically every year is inherently paradoxical. It requires more and more new users and new funds to offset the dilution caused by annual issuance. Once this chain breaks, the consequences are obvious.

Precisely because of this "certainty risk" warning, I have started adjusting my strategy. Most long-term capital has shifted from these narrative-driven assets to assets with completely opposite attributes—stablecoins.

I chose USDD.

The comparison is simple: DOGE is continuously issued, while the core design of USDD is exactly the opposite. It uses an over-collateralization mechanism, with every circulating USDD backed by sufficient assets, and no built-in dilution logic. There’s no need to calculate how many new users are required to offset the issuance; the assets are there, and stability is there.

This is the meaning of "trust through stability." It’s not about betting whether a certain narrative will materialize, but about choosing certainty in fighting inflation and maintaining purchasing power. While others are still calculating Dogecoin’s new user equation, stablecoin assets are already in a system where dilution is no longer a concern.

DOGE-2.59%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DegenWhisperer

· 2025-12-27 22:09

Here we go again. Every time Dogecoin goes up a little, someone promotes global adoption, but no one can bypass the dead end of 5 billion years of issuance. Stablecoins are indeed stable, but what do you rely on to make money? This logic isn't flawed, but if everyone thinks this way, it actually makes things more interesting.

View OriginalReply0

PerpetualLonger

· 2025-12-27 16:59

Uh... that makes some sense, but I'm still holding onto my Dogecoin. The rebound has just begun. It's time to add to my position. Don't be scared by the bears; history is written by the bulls. USDD and such... I still believe in DOGE more. In a bull market, what is a little inflation? Wait, let me think... actually, stablecoins don't seem to make much money either? Forget it, I'm still fully invested in DOGE. Buying the dip, buying the dip. This time, I'll definitely break even.

View OriginalReply0

ProposalManiac

· 2025-12-27 16:01

5 billion/year in issuance, in plain terms, is a mechanism of death sentence. No matter how good the narrative is, it can't withstand the mathematics.

View OriginalReply0

MEVSupportGroup

· 2025-12-24 22:50

Still dreaming of Dogecoin again, 5 billion new coins every year, what kind of leak does this pool have to have? Wait, he said to USDD? I get the logic of stablecoins, but can they really beat inflation? New users every day offset the issuance, this trick sounds just like hot potato. DOGE is essentially a story coin, it can't be told forever, right? 50 million coins annual issuance, anyone would find it headache-inducing, no wonder he ran away. Stablecoins are indeed stable, but it feels like nothing can be relied on these days. A coin with infinite issuance being pushed upward, how much money would it take to pump it? Exchange rate stability ≠ value growth, don’t confuse these two. Switching to stablecoins means giving up the dream of getting rich quickly? Or is this really the way to survive?

View OriginalReply0

ETHmaxi_NoFilter

· 2025-12-24 22:48

You're still hyping Dogecoin, haven't you seen the 5 billion coins added annually? A leaking basin can never be filled, reality is this cruel. Honestly, stablecoins are more attractive; no need to gamble on narratives. DOGE's logical flaws are so big, yet they still want to hit $1—kind of naive. This analysis hits the nail on the head; the issuance mechanism is always the Achilles' heel.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-40edb63b

· 2025-12-24 22:48

Annual issuance of 5 billion coins, this is outrageous, an endless hole that can't be filled --- Exactly, relying solely on new user influx can't withstand the annual dilution --- So we still need to choose stablecoins, otherwise we're always racing against issuance --- This logic is actually quite heartbreaking, but it indeed doesn't hold up DOGE --- Stablecoins are the real winners, no need to worry about issuance or anything --- It sounds like the design of USDD is actually reversed, I need to study this further --- 50 billion per year feels like betting on endless new user growth, is it really reliable --- Changing the approach to stablecoins, this move is quite aggressive --- In the long run, you still need to find something without built-in inflation, DOGE can't patch this loophole --- "Global large-scale adoption" sounds good, but issuance will always be a hard constraint

View OriginalReply0

MEVSandwich

· 2025-12-24 22:47

Annual issuance of 5 billion, who can withstand this? No matter how good DOGE's story is, it can't fill this gap. It's still comfortable to stay in stablecoins.

View OriginalReply0

SchroedingerAirdrop

· 2025-12-24 22:37

Never gamble on a coin that survives on stories; that's the real lesson. --- 50 billion tokens every year, this can't be stopped. Sooner or later, you'll have to pay the price. --- Wait, so are you still calculating how many new users DOGE needs to stay stable? Wake up. --- I accept the logic of stablecoins; at least there's no need to play guessing games. --- It's hard to sustain, another newcomer being fooled into thinking it's "adopted globally." --- No matter how good Doge's story is, it can't compare to the brutal reality of automatic annual issuance. --- Jumping from narrative assets to stablecoins is indeed a clear-headed move, saving the hassle of daily calculations. --- Here's the question: what's the difference between a stablecoin with no users and a pile of dust? --- More and more new funds are needed to offset dilution... Isn't this just a game of hot potato? Whoever ends up holding the bag is unlucky. --- It's basically a gamble on human nature—whether people will keep pouring money in.

View OriginalReply0

NftDeepBreather

· 2025-12-24 22:25

After some thought, this logic indeed makes no mistake. To be honest, the annual 5 billion issuance of Dogecoin is truly an insurmountable hurdle. I get the idea behind USDD; stability is what matters. Annual dilution vs. permanent collateralization—these are not on the same level. Compared to betting on whether someone will take over later, I also prefer to choose something stable. Honestly, when I saw that "large-scale global adoption," I just laughed; it's better to just listen. No matter how impressive DOGE's narrative is, physical laws are there, and no one can change them. This is the real risk management, not going all-in on a certain concept.

View OriginalReply0

Frontrunner

· 2025-12-24 22:24

An annual issuance of 5 billion coins, who can withstand that... Filling the holes alone requires a continuous influx of new participants. Once it stops, it's game over. Stablecoins are indeed attractive, no need to gamble on whether the narrative can be realized. Forget it, just lie flat and let the believers chase after it. I've seen this kind of scheme before; in the end, it's all about harvesting the leeks. DOGE is just a story coin; no matter how good the story is, it can't change the fate of dilution.

View OriginalReply0