The COAI project has been listed on Binance and OKX futures, and the team's manipulation tactics are indeed clever. By combining low circulation with high control, they have harvested over 100 million USD in funds in the secondary market. This approach can be described as textbook-level.

But there's an interesting thing here—their AI product was exposed to be almost identical to an already launched project, with no significant difference in both functionality design and user interface. This raises a question: how did such a project pass the listing review on these top platforms? Is it due to differences in review standards, or are there other considerations?

This phenomenon indeed exists in the market and also reflects the true nature of some project teams. Investors need to be more cautious.