2025-12-11 02:31:59

Some dev's planning to launch an OG meme token with a 40-50% bundle allocation. The strategy? Prevent early snipers from fighting over scraps at a 20k market cap.

They claim this approach is now essential for pushing meme coins into the multi-million range.

Would this token distribution model convince you to buy in?

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
6
Repost
Share

Comment

Add a comment

BlockchainTherapist

· 2025-12-13 11:44

It's the same old story: a high lock-up ratio makes it more likely to be suspected of rug pulling.

These days, with meme coins, do you still believe they can reach a market cap of one million? First, ask yourself: can you survive the next bear market?

View OriginalReply0

GraphGuru

· 2025-12-11 03:02

40-50% bundling? Laughing out loud, it's the same old trick, and in the end, it's just another way to harvest retail investors.

View OriginalReply0

SerumSquirrel

· 2025-12-11 03:02

40-50% lock-up... It sounds like they want to prevent sniping, but it still seems like it can't escape the fate of a dump later on.

View OriginalReply0

StablecoinGuardian

· 2025-12-11 03:02

Haha, it's the same old trick again. Bundling 50% is just to prevent retail investors from bottom-fishing and crashing the price.

---

A $20,000 market cap sniper? Just hearing this reason is absurd. The real issue is poor liquidity.

---

No matter how you distribute meme coins, it won't change the final zeroing of the value.

---

It sounds nice, but actually it's just wanting to keep enough chips for themselves. I can't believe it.

---

Instead of defending against snipers, it's better to guard against your own exit scam. That's the key.

---

A meme coin with a market cap of millions, wake up everyone, is this even possible?

---

Bundling 40-50%? Retail investors can only move so much. There's no point in buying into this appearance.

View OriginalReply0

ruggedNotShrugged

· 2025-12-11 02:47

It's the same story again; the higher the lock-up ratio, the more suspicious it seems.

View OriginalReply0

SocialAnxietyStaker

· 2025-12-11 02:42

40-50% lock-up? Sounds like a tactic to prevent retail investors from bottom-fishing. This move can fend off snipers but can't stop the subsequent profit-taking, haha.

View OriginalReply0