Honestly? This might be the most polarizing take I've seen circulating lately, but there's something refreshing about it. Most folks just follow the herd without thinking. Santiago's real mistake? Actually bothering to explain himself to the masses when he doesn't need to.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DaoGovernanceOfficervip
· 2025-12-11 05:31
ngl, the whole "explaining yourself to the masses" framing is doing a lot of work here... empirically speaking, when protocol decisions lack transparent rationale, you get worse governance outcomes. data from snapshot voting patterns pretty clearly shows this. Santiago either commits to stakeholder communication or we're just watching decentralization theater unfold, tbh. which is it?
Reply0
VCsSuckMyLiquidityvip
· 2025-12-10 04:37
Ha, that's right, why explain it to those followers
View OriginalReply0
FallingLeafvip
· 2025-12-08 05:59
Alright, I just think Santiago is overthinking it... what's the point?
View OriginalReply0
ShitcoinConnoisseurvip
· 2025-12-08 05:53
Hmm... Santiago is really overthinking it, there's no need to argue with the retail investors.
View OriginalReply0
ExpectationFarmervip
· 2025-12-08 05:53
What's the point? As long as you keep your own accounts clear, there's no need to explain anything to those who just follow the trend.
View OriginalReply0
CountdownToBrokevip
· 2025-12-08 05:49
ngl this viewpoint is definitely a bit provocative, but Santiago really is just making trouble for himself... what's the point?
View OriginalReply0
RadioShackKnightvip
· 2025-12-08 05:37
ngl Santiago is overthinking it, there's really no need to bother talking to these people at all.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin