What's the issue with AI Computing Power right now? Cloud service providers are holding onto GPU resources, but expanding the cluster requires a massive amount of funding; investors have money and want to hop on the AI express, but can't find a reliable entry point. On the DeFi side, there's so much Liquidity that it's overflowing, yet the value of AI infrastructure can't be realized. Both sides are anxious, but the bridge in the middle is broken.



There is a project called GAIB that has truly made this happen—directly moving the AI infrastructure of the real world onto the blockchain, turning it into tradable digital assets. They are focusing on GPUs, which are the lifeblood of the AI industry, pouring money into cloud service providers and data centers to upgrade equipment and optimize Computing Power scheduling. The Computing Power and future profits generated from this substantial investment are packaged into tokens through blockchain, forming the value support for the entire ecosystem. And what ties all of this together? It is the AI synthetic dollar they issued, AID.

AID is designed quite brilliantly: it uses U.S. Treasury bonds and stable assets as collateral, locking a 1:1 exchange rate with the U.S. dollar, directly suppressing volatility. However, it is not a pure stablecoin—holders can stake AID to exchange it for sAID, allowing them to passively earn GPU computing rewards. The combination of the security of stable assets and the explosive growth of AI provides a position for both conservatives and radicals.

In simple terms, what GAIB is doing is using tokenization to unlock the value of AI infrastructure, allowing DeFi funds to flow towards real Computing Power assets, while also providing an opportunity for ordinary people to participate in the AI dividend. Cloud service providers obtain funding to expand capacity, investors gain rights to share the profits, and Liquidity finds a tangible value anchor—this cross-border experiment of AI and DeFi is intertwining the demands of the three parties into a single thread.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
WhaleSurfer
· 2025-12-03 21:57
This is what real infrastructure narrative looks like, not those hyped-up vaporware projects.

I've always thought the GPU track was underrated, and finally someone has truly connected idle DeFi funds with computing power demand.

AID's design is interesting—the combination of stability and yield can indeed attract two different groups of users.

But wait, could there be risks with the US Treasury collateral part? We'll have to see how they actually manage it.
View OriginalReply0
BasementAlchemist
· 2025-12-02 05:28
Well... the issue of GPUs being squeezed to death should have been resolved a long time ago.

The combination of stablecoins + Computing Power profits is okay, but I don't know if the real ROI can be realized.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleWatcher
· 2025-11-30 23:53
Well... this logical chain is indeed closed, but if GAIB really wants to implement this... it depends on the execution capability.

To be honest, it feels a bit like speculating on concepts. Can the returns generated from the real investment in GPUs be delivered on time? That's the core issue.

I understand the design of AID, but can this US Treasury collateral system hold up in a Bear Market?

The demand for finding anchor points in DeFi liquidity is real, but the question is how to manage risks next...

Looking at the design, it seems perfect, but will the actual operation turn out to be another story?
View OriginalReply0
CountdownToBroke
· 2025-11-30 23:52
Oh, finally someone has paved this road, that wall was really suffocating.

That's how making money is, just missing a bridge.

Wait, can AID really hold up? Government bond collateral sounds reliable, but can this on-chain trap be trusted?

Wow, lying down to earn GPU earnings? Isn't this just the opportunity we've been waiting for?

It seems this logic really has blocked the loopholes, all three parties can profit.

Real assets on-chain, this time it seems like it's for real, not a mirage.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingersPaper
· 2025-11-30 23:49
Hmm? Has GAIB really connected the value chain of GPUs? Why do I feel like this is just another "beautiful vision" BTC...
View OriginalReply0
MoonlightGamer
· 2025-11-30 23:47
This set of combination punches really solves the bottleneck, and GPU resources finally have pricing power.

If it can really run through the closed loop, it would be amazing; what I'm afraid of is that it will end up becoming another kind of scamcoin that plays people for suckers.

The revenue source of sAID must be real, otherwise, what's the difference from a Ponzi scheme?

DeFi liquidity finally has a place to go, and this idea is quite innovative.

However, will cloud service providers be locked on-chain, making it increasingly difficult for them to make independent decisions...
View OriginalReply0
MemeKingNFT
· 2025-11-30 23:45
Uh... this buildup is a bit intense, but to be honest, I'm still digesting the lessons learned from the NFT fiasco.

Real GPU assets on-chain? Sounds a thousand times more reliable than those JPG images before, but I can't help but feel a bit scared.

That AID stablecoin + sAID yield design, wow, isn't this just a rehash of DeFi mining from a couple of years ago... I've already been burned once by those "risk-free annualized 50%" offers.

That said, if we can truly unlock the value of computing power, this might be what blockchain is meant to do—rather than trading images.😅
View OriginalReply0
MevHunter
· 2025-11-30 23:43
Wow, this is exactly what Web3 should be doing, directly reviving dead money

---

GPU resources are being choked by cloud providers, and DeFi liquidity has nowhere to go... GAIB has indeed found that bottleneck

---

I need to take a look at the combination of stablecoins + yield rights, but I need to ask about the safety audit of the AID design

---

Another project that "solves the pain points of three parties"; let's first look at AID's collateral ratio and liquidation mechanism before talking

---

I've heard a lot about bringing real assets on-chain, but the key is whether there are really GPU earnings flowing in

---

1:1 exchange rate locked, staking can still share computing power earnings... this design is flashy, but where is the risk?

---

DeFi's idle money finally has a place to go; if it can really commercialize computing power, it's worth considering

---

The lifeline of the GPU industry? Sounds a bit exaggerated; it still depends on how many real computing units are on-chain
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin