#特朗普加密货币政策新方向 Here's a fun fact: The 1918 Nobel Prize in Physics winner Planck proposed the quantum hypothesis, which directly inspired Einstein's theory of light quanta. Later, people like Bohr and Heisenberg followed this path and built the entire framework of Quantum Mechanics.



There is a coin called $PLANCK, named after this physics big shot. I checked the on-chain data - the top ten addresses hold 84.6% of the supply.

I was thinking, this concentration of chips... will either skyrocket or go to zero? Anyway, let's give it a try, I can afford to lose a bit of money🦊 But seriously, the Planck length (1.6×10⁻³⁵ meters) and Planck time (5.4×10⁻⁴⁴ seconds) at such extreme scales are indeed quite romantic— the boundaries of physics are like the unpredictability of the crypto market.
PLANCK79.4%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
YieldHunter
· 2025-11-30 12:40
84.6% in top 10? ngl that's literally textbook ponzi concentration... technically speaking if you run the correlation coefficient on whale movement vs price action, these things always rugpull within 3 months. seen it a thousand times. pretty name doesn't change the math tho
Reply0
ForumMiningMaster
· 2025-11-27 22:30
The top ten addresses hold 84.6%, which is definitely a signal of a rug pull, no matter how impressive the name is.

Gambler mentality get, after all, it's just for fun, small amounts to test the waters are fine.

The name Plank definitely stands out, the aura of a physics pro can't be worth much.

With chips so concentrated, can the market maker let retail investors make money? Dream on.

The boundaries of physics are just as unpredictable as the crypto market, all based on luck.

To put it bluntly, no matter how profound the theoretical packaging is, it can't cover that 84.6% risk.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanPhantom
· 2025-11-27 13:21
84.6% concentrated in the top ten? Isn't this just casino chips, the market maker's whipsaw feeling is full

It's just a matter of Twitter popularity between drop to zero and big pump, hilarious

Can Planck length and coin price fluctuation be compared? That's a bit too romantic, buddy

How can you dare to touch such a high concentration coin? Isn't that looking for a knife?

Can you trust just because the name borrows from a physics pro? Then my Wallet also contains "Schrodinger's profit".
View OriginalReply0
ForkInTheRoad
· 2025-11-27 13:08
84.6% is in the hands of the top ten? How to use this, the market maker just pressed it down directly

This coin name borrows the shell of physicists, it’s actually a gambler's game, I see it’s uncertain

The set of Planck time is indeed extraordinary, but the "randomness" in the crypto world is even more unpredictable than Quantum Mechanics, really

With the chips so concentrated, the rise and fall are outrageous, small investors entering is just giving away money

To put it bluntly, it's still that set - concept + story + luck, it’s the same thing
View OriginalReply0
MysteryBoxOpener
· 2025-11-27 13:07
84.6% in the hands of Whales... isn't this a nested doll, another gamble

The name Planck is quite hardcore, but in the crypto world, no matter what name you give, it's still Be Played for Suckers

Using the name of a physics pro to play people for suckers is somewhat ridiculous

With such concentration in the top ten Addresses, get ready for dumping, fren
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin