Speaking of the $PARTI project, it indeed had its glory days early on—aside from raising $23 million in funding, a leading exchange also participated in the investment (the specific amount has not been disclosed).



Technically, it aims to build a cross-chain ecosystem between Layer1 and Layer2, which can be considered an infrastructure project. Looking at the token data now, the circulation has reached 97%, and the chip release is basically in place.

In this case, occasional surges can be understandable—after all, the unlocking pressure has decreased, giving the operators more flexibility. However, a high circulation rate also means that an increase requires more real buying support; relying solely on emotional speculation is likely not sustainable.
PARTI0.96%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
ShitcoinConnoisseurvip
· 2025-11-27 03:19
97% Circulating Supply and still want to pump? How much real money needs to come in for that to work?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationHuntervip
· 2025-11-26 20:12
A circulation rate of 97% still wants to pump, isn't this just betting on sentiment?

---

The cross-chain infrastructure track is already saturated, what makes PARTI stand out?

---

Financing of 23 million sounds like a lot, but looking at the current performance, it's really a bit disappointing.

---

Once the chips are released, it becomes even more dangerous; without unlocking expectations, the market is easier to scatter.

---

Having top exchanges involved doesn't help; we still need to look at the real Trading Volume.

---

Another project that ends with "technical bull market and financing bull market" but the coin price collapses.

---

With 97% circulating supply still daring to speculate, how many retail investors need to catch a falling knife?

---

Infrastructure projects without ecological applications to support them, how far can just telling stories go?

---

Market makers have a large space for flexible operations? Doesn't that mean it's easy to dump?
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseVagabondvip
· 2025-11-26 08:16
97% Circulating Supply, this is a market maker paradise, but where is the real buying power?

---

There is room for a pump, but what about durability? I have no confidence.

---

Infrastructure sounds advanced, but saying cross-chain ecosystem construction is like saying nothing.

---

Raising 23 million still relies on emotional trading, which is somewhat precarious.

---

The unlocking pressure has decreased, but it’s actually dangerous; the chips are too scattered, and no one is catching a falling knife.

---

Current projects are all like this; they raise funds early to grab money, and the technology doesn’t matter.

---

With such a high circulation rate, do you still expect it to rise? Unless there’s a new story to tell.
View OriginalReply0
LadderToolGuyvip
· 2025-11-24 20:26
97% has circulated and you still want to pump? You need real money to enter the market, just talking is useless.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoCrazyGFvip
· 2025-11-24 03:55
97% Circulating Supply can still pump, luckily it's in the infrastructure track that can sell the story.
View OriginalReply0
CrashHotlinevip
· 2025-11-24 03:49
97% Circulating Supply is really amazing, how can it still rise...

---

Wait, with 23 million in financing and a leading exchange participating? The market maker's chips should have been absorbed by now, right?

---

The cross-chain concept is indeed good, but the name PARTI sounds a bit like party... dying of laughter

---

With the Circulating Supply all released, do you still want to rely on emotions to pump? Wake up, everyone

---

So buying PARTI now means catching a falling knife, right?

---

The infrastructure sounds impressive, but in reality... chips are everywhere
View OriginalReply0
CommunityJanitorvip
· 2025-11-24 03:46
97% is already in circulation, so now the whales can really do whatever they want.
View OriginalReply0
ContractCollectorvip
· 2025-11-24 03:44
A circulation rate of 97% and you want to pump? Unless there's real money coming in, this is just a paper article.
View OriginalReply0
DaoDevelopervip
· 2025-11-24 03:35
97% circulation already? yeah that's the real test – like, sure pump potential exists when unlock pressure drops, but tbh the tokenomics design here feels backwards. if you're building l1-l2 composability you'd want better alignment incentives, not just whale flexibility. need to check their governance primitives on this one fr
Reply0
StablecoinSkepticvip
· 2025-11-24 03:26
97% Circulating Supply, this is ridiculous, to put it bluntly, it means the dumping risk is gone, and the rise is just that much.

---

The participation of top exchanges is still attractive, but I'm afraid the real buying pressure won't keep up later.

---

Cross-chain infrastructure sounds good, but with such a large circulating supply, can it really sustain the rise?

---

The release of chips is a double-edged sword; there's no pressure but also no real moat left.

---

Such projects are most afraid of false prosperity under high circulation rates; those who wake up early are better off.

---

23 million in financing sounds like a lot, but with such high circulation, it feels severely diluted.

---

A large market maker space means high risk; retail investors should still be cautious.

---

A rise needs real buying support; this statement is clear—emotional speculation can't last long.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin