Fluid, as a lending protocol, has its core innovation in the conversion of debt into liquidity through the Smart Debt mechanism. This means that the traditional framework for analyzing lending ratios may not apply here. Many people often overlook the fundamental differences in the underlying architecture of such protocols when evaluating them—treating debt as a tradable asset in itself subverts the logic of conventional lending protocols. Therefore, merely using borrowing ratios to measure it can indeed lead to one-sided conclusions.

FLUID-2.11%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
CryptoDouble-O-Sevenvip
· 2025-11-22 12:28
Haha, alright. Smart Debt sounds pretty novel, but can this theory actually work in practice?
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseVagabondvip
· 2025-11-21 09:11
Oh wow, someone has finally spelled it out—most people analyze Fluid by just applying old frameworks to new things, which is honestly ridiculous.
View OriginalReply0
SocialAnxietyStakervip
· 2025-11-20 16:23
What you said is correct, but can this Fluid logic really be implemented, or is it just another PPT protocol?
View OriginalReply0
SellLowExpertvip
· 2025-11-20 16:22
Bro, I need to take a closer look at this trap of debt liquidity... The traditional lending indicator system might really be ineffective here.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a180694bvip
· 2025-11-20 16:14
It's that kind of trap that packages debt into liquidity again; it sounds very competitive.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeGazervip
· 2025-11-20 15:58
Oh, this is the idea! The thought of debt liquidity... I’m afraid someone is going to trap it with the old framework again.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin