🍁 Golden Autumn, Big Prizes Await!
Gate Square Growth Points Lucky Draw Carnival Round 1️⃣ 3️⃣ Is Now Live!
🎁 Prize pool over $15,000+, iPhone 17 Pro Max, Gate exclusive Merch and more awaits you!
👉 Draw now: https://www.gate.com/activities/pointprize/?now_period=13&refUid=13129053
💡 How to earn more Growth Points for extra chances?
1️⃣ Go to [Square], tap the icon next to your avatar to enter [Community Center]
2️⃣ Complete daily tasks like posting, commenting, liking, and chatting to rack up points!
🍀 100% win rate — you’ll never walk away empty-handed. Try your luck today!
Details: ht
Ethereum's Epic Overhaul: Ditching EVM for RISC-V in Bold Move
I've been watching Ethereum's evolution for years, and let me tell you - this potential shift from EVM to RISC-V might be the most audacious move I've seen yet. It's not just another upgrade; it's practically rebuilding the entire damn house while people are still living in it!
The issue is painfully obvious to anyone working with ZK tech. Current zkEVM solutions are like trying to run Windows 95 on quantum hardware - the interpreter overhead is killing performance by 50-800x. As someone who's suffered through these bottlenecks, I can't help but feel frustrated that we've been limping along with this architecture for so long.
Those precompiled contracts? Don't get me started. They're a bloody nightmare that nearly crashed consensus multiple times. Vitalik's not mincing words anymore - he's calling them "catastrophic" and wants to slam the door shut on adding any more. I'm actually shocked it took this long for the team to admit this technical debt was unsustainable.
The 256-bit stack design made perfect sense back in 2015, but for ZK proof generation? Pure torture. I've spent countless hours optimizing around these limitations, and it feels like trying to win Formula 1 with a horse-drawn carriage.
RISC-V seems like the obvious escape hatch. With just 47 core instructions and mainstream language support through LLVM, it's already the de facto standard in the zkVM world. Nine out of ten projects have chosen it! The market has spoken, and Ethereum would be foolish to swim against this tide.
What excites me most is the migration strategy - it's surprisingly pragmatic. Starting with RISC-V as precompiled modules before moving to a dual VM approach feels like the right balance between innovation and stability. The final "Rosetta" strategy of implementing EVM within RISC-V is quite clever.
The implications for the ecosystem are fascinating. Optimistic rollups like Arbitrum and Optimism might be in serious trouble - their entire fraud proof mechanism depends on EVM! Meanwhile, ZK rollups will be laughing all the way to the bank with their already RISC-V-aligned architectures. The power dynamics in the L2 space could shift dramatically.
For developers, this change means we might finally escape the Solidity monopoly. Don't get me wrong, Solidity has its place, but being able to write smart contracts in Rust or Go directly on L1? That's revolutionary freedom we've needed for ages.
For users, the 100x reduction in proof costs could finally deliver on the promise of a high-throughput L1. Imagine 10,000 TPS without sacrificing security or decentralization!
The risks are real though. Gas measurement becomes more complex, and I'm particularly concerned about toolchain security. Those of us who've battled compiler vulnerabilities know how nasty they can be - and now the security model shifts to relying heavily on off-chain compilers.
Ultimately, this move represents Ethereum's evolution from a "smart contract platform" to something far more ambitious - a verifiable trust layer for the entire internet. It's either brilliant foresight or spectacular overreach, but I've got to admire the boldness of it all.