🍁 Golden Autumn, Big Prizes Await!
Gate Square Growth Points Lucky Draw Carnival Round 1️⃣ 3️⃣ Is Now Live!
🎁 Prize pool over $15,000+, iPhone 17 Pro Max, Gate exclusive Merch and more awaits you!
👉 Draw now: https://www.gate.com/activities/pointprize/?now_period=13&refUid=13129053
💡 How to earn more Growth Points for extra chances?
1️⃣ Go to [Square], tap the icon next to your avatar to enter [Community Center]
2️⃣ Complete daily tasks like posting, commenting, liking, and chatting to rack up points!
🍀 100% win rate — you’ll never walk away empty-handed. Try your luck today!
Details: ht
Strike Founder Slams Ethereum's Claims to Dethrone Bitcoin
Jack Mallers, the maverick founder of Strike, isn't mincing words about Ethereum's prospects. I've been following this guy for a while, and man, he's got some strong opinions about the Bitcoin vs Ethereum debate.
When Ethereum co-founder Joseph Lubin suggested ETH would eventually overtake BTC, Mallers basically laughed in his face. He called the whole idea "absurd" - and honestly, I kinda see his point.
From where I'm sitting, Mallers is making a distinction that many crypto enthusiasts miss. Bitcoin isn't just playing in the tech sandbox - it's challenging the entire monetary system. That's a $500 TRILLION market we're talking about! Ethereum? In Mallers' view, it's just another tech company with some fancy features.
Look at the charts - BTC trading around $108,947 (down 2.02%) while ETH sits at $3,946 (down 1.32%). The numbers don't lie, but they don't tell the whole story either.
The thing that pisses me off about these debates is how tribal everyone gets. Bitcoin maximalists act like Ethereum is worthless, while ETH devotees think their smart contracts will change the world overnight.
Truth is, these trading platforms are making bank regardless of which one "wins." They collect fees no matter what direction the market goes.
I've watched Mallers closely, and while he's brilliant, he's got serious skin in the Bitcoin game. Strike is built on Bitcoin's Lightning Network, so obviously he's not exactly unbiased. His $50 million net worth is deeply tied to Bitcoin's success.
What's funny is how Mallers portrays Bitcoin as this revolutionary force while dismissing Ethereum as just another tech project. But isn't Bitcoin also technology? The mental gymnastics these advocates perform to justify their positions is sometimes ridiculous.
The market will ultimately decide which narrative prevails. While Wall Street seems increasingly interested in Ethereum lately, Bitcoin still maintains its first-mover advantage and institutional appeal.
My money? Well, I'm not telling you where to put yours. But I will say this - the truly smart players in this space aren't wedded to ideological purity. They're watching the tech, the adoption, and the use cases evolve in real time.