🎒 Gate Square “Blue & White Travel Season” Merch Challenge is here!
📸 Theme: #GateAnywhere🌍
Let’s bring Gate’s blue and white to every corner of the world.
— Open the gate, Gate Anywhere
Take your Gate merch on the go — show us where blue and white meet your life!
At the office, on the road, during a trip, or in your daily setup —
wherever you are, let Gate be part of the view 💙
💡 Creative Ideas (Any style, any format!)
Gate merch displays
Blue & white outfits
Creative logo photography
Event or travel moments
The more personal and creative your story, the more it shines ✨
✅ How to Partici
Oversubscribed by 200 times from Umbra, looking at the innovation of MetaDAO's financing mechanism.
Author: KarenZ, Foresight News
Last week (October 10), the privacy protocol Umbra completed its community sale on the MetaDAO platform. This public sale attracted over 10,000 participants, with a total subscription amount nearing $155 million, which is 200 times the project's planned minimum funding amount.
After the sale ends, the project party sets the actual financing cap at 3 million USD, and ultimately each subscribing user only receives about 2% of the subscription quota, with the remaining funds returned as originally intended.
What is even more noteworthy is that, even against the backdrop of a significant correction in the cryptocurrency market, the price of the UMBRA token has shown strong resilience: the current price (1.5 USD) has increased by 4 times from the initial issuance price (0.3 USD). This performance not only confirms the market's confidence in the privacy sector but also highlights the attractiveness of MetaDAO's unique financing model.
At the same time, the MetaDAO platform token META is also not to be outdone, with its market value surpassing 200 million dollars today, setting a new historical high, and its increase this month has exceeded 4 times.
As a Solana ecosystem privacy protocol built on Arcium technology, Umbra's popularity is closely tied to the explosive benefits of the privacy sector. However, when the market's attention focuses on Umbra itself, its issued MetaDAO platform may hold even greater opportunities — this financing tool, which claims to prevent rug pulls, along with its organization that emphasizes "market-oriented governance," is paving a new path for token issuance in crypto projects.
MetaDAO: From "Zero VC Start" to Paradigm Endorsement
The starting point of MetaDAO is not a luxurious financing kickoff like traditional crypto projects, but rather an exploration of solutions to the pain points of financing in the crypto industry.
Traditional ICOs have long faced three major pain points: founders lack motivation to continue working after receiving a fixed token allocation, early investors engage in "quick in and out" practices that lead to price dumping, and communities lack stickiness, resulting in projects easily falling into the trap of "initial hype but long-term stagnation." MetaDAO is designed specifically to address these issues, with the core logic of replacing "single-token voting" with "market-driven governance" and substituting "performance-linked incentives" for "fixed token allocations."
MetaDAO Operating Mechanism
In simple terms, MetaDAO is not just a "financing tool"; it transforms project founders and investors from "short-term profit seekers" to "long-term co-builders." It allows founders to secure initial funding while ensuring that they must deliver a successful project to gain more returns. At the same time, it gives investors the opportunity to participate in early-stage projects and avoids "capital loss" through transparent rules.
MetaDAO has currently developed into a Launchpad platform and governance system based on Solana, with the core goal of addressing pain points in traditional cryptocurrency financing such as "Rug" risks and incentive misalignment. The new MetaDAO platform will officially open to the public on October 6, 2025, supporting financing for the first batch of 5 projects.
Anti Rug ICO: Writing "security" into the mechanism
If choosing to issue on MetaDAO, the project team needs to accept some restrictions that may seem unusual from a traditional world perspective. For example, MetaDAO locks risks from several dimensions:
How to set up the ICO mechanism for ###?
The ICO mechanism design of MetaDAO is ingenious and takes into account the interests of both the project party and the investors to a certain extent:
Note: On the night of the day when the Umbra sale ends, all the allocated tokens will be unlocked and directly distributed to users' wallets, and the remaining funds will also be refunded via the original payment method.
Futarchy Governance: Let the "market" make decisions, not "voting"
MetaDAO does not adopt the traditional DAO's "token voting" (which can easily be manipulated by large holders), but instead uses Futarchy to determine the direction of the project — a governance model that allows "traders to vote with their funds," guiding decisions through prediction markets.
The core logic of this governance is based on the ideas of economist Robin Hanson: people "bet" on the potential impact of proposals on the value of project tokens through trading, thus aggregating collective wisdom and ensuring that only those proposals that the market believes can enhance value will be adopted.
The core logic of MetaDAO's Futarchy governance is:
Summary
In the current trend of "short-term profit-seeking" in the crypto industry, MetaDAO's innovation lies in: using "mechanism design" to lock in security to a certain extent, and replacing "zero-sum games" with "interest binding," hoping to create an "interest community" between founders and investors.
For founders who want to work diligently, MetaDAO offers a path of "fair financing without relying on VCs"; for investors seeking security, MetaDAO reduces the risk of "being Rugged" through multi-dimensional rules.
However, it should be noted that the cryptocurrency market is highly volatile, and no mechanism is a "universal insurance": even with protective mechanisms in place, the price of project tokens may still decline significantly due to factors such as market trends, business progress, and the full unlocking of public sales; at the same time, governance can only prevent "malicious behavior by the team" and cannot guarantee the inevitable success of the project — investors still need to make comprehensive judgments based on the project's fundamentals and the prospects of the sector.
In the next article, the author will focus on a new project that plans to launch a public sale on MetaDAO.