Bitcoin ETF runs for 13 days straight, $4.3 billion escapes
Net outflows for 13 consecutive trading days.
$4.33 billion, vanishing into thin air.
Rolling outflows over 7, 10, 20 days all hit record highs.
This isn’t retail panic selling. This is institutional-level systematic divestment.
You think it’s short-term noise? Wrong. This is Wall Street holding Bitcoin, rethinking a question:
“Bitcoin, what does it really mean in my asset portfolio?”
Since May 15, every morning has been the same script: ETF outflows, outflows, and more outflows. To date, a total of 59,351 BTC has left.
Meanwhile, Saylor—the “number one Bitcoin whale”—comes out and says:
“Don’t panic, this isn’t damage, it’s capital rotation. The money has all gone into AI.”
Is he right? Half right.
In the past six months, AI infrastructure has swallowed about $400 billion. By 2026, U.S. tech giants’ budgets are expected to exceed $600 billion.
The money is indeed flowing out. But the question is—
Will the money that’s flowed out come back?
Saylor himself, Strategy company, holds 843,706 BTC, with a cost basis of about $63.9 billion. At current prices, an unrealized loss of $10 billion.
Six years of accumulation, a 17% loss.
Meanwhile, the S&P 500 has risen 116%.
Think about it, reflect carefully. If you bought the S&P 500 index six years ago, it’s doubled. If you bought Bitcoin, you’re still at a loss.
This is the reality Wall Street is re-evaluating.
Previously, what was the reason for institutions to buy Bitcoin? Hedge inflation, digital gold, uncorrelated asset, future currency.
And now?
Inflation is tied to oil prices (WTI is nearly $95), gold can’t keep up with AI chip stocks. The so-called “uncorrelated” has become a false proposition in the face of geopolitics and macro liquidity.
Bitcoin is no longer that “layup” asset.
It’s being reclassified by Wall Street: from “strategic reserve asset” to “high volatility risk exposure.”
Once this classification is complete, its portfolio weight will be systematically reduced. This isn’t a one- or two-day outflow; it’s a structural reduction.
“The biggest enemy of Bitcoin isn’t regulation, it’s the S&P 500.”
“Institutions are leaving not out of panic, but because they have better options.”
So, has this re-evaluation process ended?
I tell you: far from it.
Why? Because AI capital expenditure has just begun.
$400 billion is just the appetizer, $600 billion is next year’s budget. Not to mention the allocations from sovereign funds and pension funds into AI infrastructure.
Money has opportunity costs. When one track has an expected annualized return of over 30%, and another is still digesting a 17% unrealized loss—fund managers vote with their feet, no hesitation needed.
And more brutally: AI can tell a productivity story that Bitcoin can’t.
AI is creating things, generating cash flow, changing the world. What is Bitcoin doing? Waiting for the next halving, waiting for the Fed to cut rates, waiting for “institutional adoption.”
Waiting is the most expensive cost.
“Previously, institutions bought Bitcoin to avoid missing out; now, they’re selling Bitcoin to not miss AI.”
When do you think this outflow will stop? Is Saylor’s “rotation theory” self-soothing or insightful?
#分享美股交易赢英伟达股票 #预测NBA总冠军赢20,000U $BTC $ETH $SOL
