Crypto KOL Community & Market Trends

When many people first come into money, their first instinct is to buy luxury cars, watches, and houses, and to socialize wildly—urgently trying to prove themselves to the outside world. But in reality, the hardest part isn’t making that first pot of money; it’s whether you can get through the successive ordeals, one layer after another.

☀️ GM • Happy Weekend
What a brutal week for crypto.
📉 Weekly damage:
• $150B wiped from the crypto market
• ETF outflows reached $1.79B
• $2.5B in long positions liquidated
• $BTC fell below $59K, marking a new yearly low
• $ETH dropped under $1,600, erasing over $31B in market value
Fear is high, sentiment is weak, and volatility remains elevated.
These are the moments that test conviction the most.

SpaceX will be included in the NASDAQ 100 Index on July 7, 2026. #SpaceX

Surviving in US stocks longer matters more than being right about your guesses!
It’s not that complicated—just focus on three things: trend, position, and exit.
If the overall market is weak, lower your expectations even if individual stocks are strong.
Before earnings, don’t go heavy—don’t bet directionally.
Decide first how much you’re willing to lose, then think about how much you want to make.
If the price level breaks, exit—don’t get emotionally attached to your account.
With stocks that have poor liquidity, keep it to a minimum; it’s worse to be unable to sell than to be unable to buy.
The news itself doesn’t matter—the price reaction after the news does.
If your position is wrong, even a correct viewpoint can still lose money.
For every trade, review three points: your entry, your position, and your exit.

ETH at $1580, are you cutting losses or adding positions?

Down 7% in a day, crashing from 1692 to 1512, ETF net outflows for 7 consecutive days, BlackRock dumped $12.85 million in a single day. But just now, the 4-hour MACD showed a bullish divergence—is this a dead cat bounce or the final drop before dawn?

Your ETH, from over 2000 three months ago, has fallen to 1580 today.

A full 20% drop.

If you bought at the peak of $4000—sorry, you've already been cut in half.

First thing: ETFs are fleeing, but someone is quietly building positions

On June 27, Ethereum spot ETFs saw net outflows of $12.85 million, the 7th consecutive day of net outflows.

BlackRock's ETHA alone redeemed $12.85 million (approximately 8,150 ETH).

However, the cumulative total net inflow of Ethereum spot ETFs is still as high as $10.9 billion, with total net assets of $8.38 billion, accounting for 4.42% of ETH's total market cap.

Second thing: Down 7% in a day, but someone caught the falling knife at 1512

ETH crashed directly from $1692 to $1512, a single-day drop of 5.9%.

Currently trading around 1580, a rebound of nearly $70 from the low.

Key details—

When it hit 1512, trading volume exploded.

Then what? Buying pressure returned, and the price V-rebounded to 1580.

Third thing: The Glamsterdam upgrade could be ETH's 'The Merge moment'

ETH's next major upgrade, Glamsterdam, is planned for the second half of 2026.

This is Ethereum's biggest network upgrade since The Merge in 2022.

Fourth thing: Fundamentals haven't collapsed; what's collapsed is your mentality

Look at some hard data:

Staking amount: About 30-32% of total supply is staked (36-40 million ETH), significantly reducing circulating selling pressure

DeFi TVL: ETH still accounts for over 60% of global DeFi share

ETF cumulative inflow: $10.9 billion, institutional holdings only increasing

ETH has fallen over 40% from its August 2025 high to now.

But have fundamentals collapsed?

No.

Bull vs bear showdown, you decide

On one side (bears telling stories):

ETF net outflows for 7 consecutive days, BlackRock leading the exodus

All moving averages are bearishly arranged, MA7 < MA30 < MA120

Fear and Greed Index at 13, extreme fear

Historical data shows a 60% probability of downward breakout with this pattern

On the other side (bulls telling the truth):

4-hour MACD bullish divergence, oversold signal has appeared

1512 low with volume rebound, someone is catching the falling knife

Glamsterdam upgrade coming in Q3, the biggest upgrade since The Merge

ETF cumulative net inflow still exceeds $10.9 billion, institutions haven't left

Staking ratio 30%+, circulating supply continuously locked

Key levels

Upper resistance: 1580-1600 → 1620-1635 → 1655-1692

Lower support: 1550-1560 → 1512-1520 → 1500 → 1490

Short-term traders:

Wait for a retrace to the 1520-1550 range, and once you see a 1-hour stop of decline with volume, lightly go long.

Stop loss: 1480.

Target: First take half profit at 1600-1620, then look at 1655-1692 if broken.

Note: If the rebound to near 1600 fails to break through with shrinking volume, beware of a 'dead cat bounce'—bears may counterattack.

Swing traders:

Build positions in batches at 1500-1550, total position controlled within 15%.

Stop loss: Reduce positions if it breaks below 1480, clear if it breaks below 1400.

Target: First look at 1700-1850, then 2000-2200

Long-term believers:

Dollar-cost average blindly below 1500.

Ignore short-term volatility, focus on Glamsterdam testnet progress and signals of renewed ETF net inflows.

The ETH/BTC ratio has fallen to historical lows—this is a typical precursor to value reversion.

Risk control points:

Don't go all in. Keep cash, wait for better positions.

Don't chase ups and downs. 10 years of experience tells me—what's most fearful is not the drop, but lack of discipline.

Can ETH at 1580 be bought?

When ETH dropped to 880 in 2022, you didn't dare to buy.

When ETH rose to 4000 in 2024, you slapped your thigh in regret.

Now at 1580, 60% cheaper than the all-time high, and you're still scared?

Analysts say it will drop to 1000.

Maybe they're right.

But I want to tell you:

The market never rebounds only after everyone is satisfied with the drop.

When you feel 'it's time to bottom fish,' it has already gone up.

Ethereum at 1580—

A game for the brave, or a graveyard for retail investors?

I don't know.

But I know one thing:

Every bull market first makes the majority despair, then runs away alone.

On the day of the Glamsterdam upgrade, where will you be?#0成本拿2股SK海力士 #哥伦比亚VS葡萄牙 #美光市值超越Meta跻身全美前十 $BTC $ETH $SOL

$BTC is struggling inside the channel and sellers are still active.
If price loses $58K, the next move can be lower.

60,300 USD BTC, Are You Buying the Dip or Cutting Losses?

ETF outflows have been in the billions for consecutive days, the price dropped from 108k to 58k, and the Fed is still raising rates—is this the last chance to get on board or a bear market continuation?

From 108k to 58k, nearly halved

Down 5% in 1 week, 19% in 1 month, over 30% year-to-date

ETF net outflows have been significant for multiple consecutive days, led by BlackRock's IBIT

With the price dropping like this, are you panicking?

First thing: Are ETF outflows "suppressing prices to accumulate" or "the end of the bull market"?

Since June, BTC spot ETFs have seen consecutive large net outflows, with hundreds of millions flowing out in a single week. GBTC has been continuously sold off due to high fees.

But ETF outflows ≠ institutions turning bearish.

Grayscale’s GBTC outflows are due to high fees; funds are rotating into lower-fee IBIT and FBTC. Moreover, cumulative net inflows still exceed tens of billions of dollars—those funds haven't run away, they're just moving.

More importantly: MicroStrategy is still buying, and long-term holders haven't sold.

Second thing: Is 58k a solid bottom or a bear market continuation?

Looking at the daily chart:

After touching 58,189, the price formed a bullish reversal candle (hammer pattern)

This level is the lowest point since September 2024 and a key institutional order block

But volume hasn't increased yet, indicating a weak rebound

Short-term resistance is at 62,000-63,000—former support turned resistance; breaking and holding above that is needed to talk about a reversal.

Third thing: Macro "three mountains" are weighing down, but the market has already priced them in

The market's biggest fears right now are:

Inflation: May CPI at 4.2% YoY, the highest since 2023

Rate hikes: The Fed dot plot shows 9 officials expect another rate hike this year

Strong USD: DXY above 101.5, risk assets suppressed

But these "bearish factors" have been talked about for two months.

Price dropped from 108k to 58k, a 46% decline—the market has already digested most of the bad news.

Bull vs. Bear, You Decide

On one side (bears say it's bad now):

Down 19% in 1 month, over 30% year-to-date, from 108k to 58k

ETF outflows continue, institutional funds retreating

CPI at 4.2%, Fed to raise rates

Strong USD suppressing risk assets

Symmetrical triangle breakdown, technically bearish

On the other side (bulls say opportunity has arrived):

58k is a historical demand zone, held multiple times

Post-halving supply tightening, long-term thesis unchanged

MicroStrategy continues to accumulate BTC, whales haven't left

Cumulative ETF net inflows still exceed tens of billions

Historically, every similar correction eventually became the bottom

Key Levels

Upper resistance: 62,000 → 63,000 (bulls' lifeline) → 65,000 → 66,000

Lower support: 58,000 → 55,000 (solid bottom) → 52,000

Short-term traders:

Go long lightly in the 58,000-59,000 range, stop loss at 57,500

First target 62,000-63,000, sell half there

If 63,000 breaks with volume, go long with stop loss at 61,500, target 65,000-66,000

Swing traders:

Wait for the daily close above 62,000 before entering

Use a trailing stop loss, target 65,000-68,000

Place stop loss below 58,000

Long-term believers:

DCA blindly below 58,000, buy more as it drops

You didn't dare to buy BTC at 15,000 in 2022, and you regretted it at 108k in 2024

Now at 58,000, it's up to you

But don't exceed 30% of total position, keep cash for black swans

The safest strategy:

Wait for ETF outflows to turn positive, for CPI to peak and fall, and for BTC to hold above 62,000

Trading on the right side always lets you sleep better than bottom-fishing on the left

BTC now looks a lot like the 15,000 level at the end of 2022—

99% of people thought "this time is different, BTC is going to zero"

Then it rose to 108k in 2024, and those who sold never got back in

At 58,000, are you telling me BTC is done?

The most amazing thing about Bitcoin is not that it never drops,

but that every time you think it's dead, it comes back stronger.

This time, it's the same. #0成本拿2股SK海力士 #美光市值超越Meta跻身全美前十 $BTC $ETH $SOL

Many people, when they first come into money, instinctively buy luxury cars, watches, houses, and dive into socializing—desperate to prove themselves to the outside world.

But in reality, the hard part isn’t earning that first pot of money—it’s surviving the layers of trials that follow.

Consumption inflation is one trial, vanity is another, being praised by those around you is one, bad investments are one, market cycle retracements are one, toxic relationships are one, and relatives and friends asking for loans, partnerships, or help are also trials.

Even more, when someone suddenly has money, resources, and exposure, they can easily be set up, hunted, and trapped by others.

On the surface it looks like opportunities, relationships, collaborations, or social circles—but underneath it might be depletion, temptation, coercion, or even traps.

So truly becoming wealthy is actually much harder than most people imagine.

For many, their downfall doesn’t start at the moment they actually lose money.

It begins the moment they rush to prove "I’ve already succeeded" and let down their guard against desire, human nature, relationships, and risk.

That’s when the seeds are already sown.

$63 HYPE, dare you buy the dip?

From $4 to $76, breaking into the top 10, then flagged by Singapore regulators, ETF net outflows, but whales are quietly accumulating.

Hyperliquid, the biggest "grassroots turnaround" story in crypto for 2026.

At the end of 2024, it was under $4. On June 15, it hit an all-time high of $76.85.

Then what?

Then came the present—$63.5, a 17% pullback from the high.

First thing: A regulatory slap creating a "golden pit"?

On June 25, Singapore's MAS added Hyperliquid to its investor alert list.

Reason: Operating without a license.

The news hit, and HYPE dropped.

Price fell from $70 to $62, an 11% decline. Then what? It stabilized.

Bearish news couldn't crash it; the dip got bought.

Second thing: Fundamentals are terrifyingly strong

Hyperliquid is the leading decentralized perpetual swap platform.

Daily trading volume: Tens of billions of USD, consistently #1 among DEXs

Own L1 blockchain: 0.07-second block time, faster than Solana

No VC backing: purely community-driven, no "institutional dumping" baggage

99% of trading fees are used for buyback/burn

Third thing: Whales are buying, retail is scared

Past week:

Whale addresses net accumulated over 2 million HYPE

Exchange HYPE balance continues to fall

Dense buy orders clustered near $62

Retail thinks "bad news = run away", whales think "bad news = discount to add"

Long vs short battle, you decide

On one side (bears scare you):

MAS warning from Singapore, regulatory risk

Dropped from $76 to $62, trend weakening

ETF net outflows recently

Market unstable, BTC struggling around $60k

Token unlocks ongoing, selling pressure

On the other side (bulls state facts):

Daily trading volume tens of billions, real revenue

99% fees used for buyback and burn, deflationary mechanism

Whales accumulating steadily at $62

Only 17% pullback from $76, bullish structure intact

Community, product, and ecosystem

Key levels

Resistance above: 68 → 70 → 72 → 76.85 (ATH)

Support below: 62 → 59 → 54

Technical in one sentence: Short-term bearish, medium-term bullish.

If $62 holds, it's a double bottom.

If $62 breaks, it's a head and shoulders.

Brothers already holding:

$62 is the last defense. If it breaks, reduce position by 50%, wait for $54 to re-enter. If it holds, stay, target $70 first take 30% profit.

Brothers with empty hands wanting to board:

Wait for a 1-hour bullish candle with volume near $62 to confirm a stop of decline. Enter light. Stop loss at $60. Target $68 → $72.

If $68 breaks up with volume, add position, target $76+.

Brothers on the sidelines:

Wait for the daily close to stabilize above $68 before chasing. Missing the bottom is fine; take sure-money trades, not gambling trades.

Position management:

Single trade no more than 5-8% of total capital.

HYPE is extremely volatile; a single piece of news can swing it 10%.

Can you buy HYPE at $63?

You didn't understand it at $4, you thought it was expensive at $40, you chased and got trapped at $76, and now it's on sale at $63—and you're still scared?

What are you waiting for?

Waiting for it to drop further? Would you dare buy it then?

Waiting for it to recover? Would you chase it then?

The biggest tragedy in crypto isn't losing money—

It's not daring to chase when it's up, not daring to buy when it's down,

And then watching others become wealthy.

Hyperliquid has the strongest fundamentals in the DEX space.

A 18x gain in a year isn't luck; it's the product delivering.#0成本拿2股SK海力士 #美光市值超越Meta跻身全美前十 #BTC下探60000美元关键关口 $BTC $ETH $HYPE

The reason for SOL's surge is actually this hilarious!!
On the day of GPT-5.6's release, because OpenAI named its flagship model "Sol", which clashes with Solana's name.
Just such a simple naming coincidence can pump the market.

GPT-5.6 and Mythos 5 Released on the Same Day: AI Tokens Up, AI Chip Stocks Crashed—The Market Is Numb

Two worlds, same day.

OpenAI released GPT-5.6, firing on three fronts—Sol, Terra, Luna. The flagship Sol model outperformed Claude Mythos 5 on coding benchmarks, yet its price is only one-third of the competitor's.

Same day, after two weeks of wrangling with the Trump administration, Anthropic finally reached a deal: Mythos 5 is approved for redeployment to over 100 U.S. institutions and large enterprises.

Two AI giants dropped major positive news on the same day.

Then what?

The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index plummeted 5.3%. Micron fell over 6%, SanDisk and Western Digital dropped over 10%, and ON Semiconductor plunged 24%.

Buy the rumor, sell the news. The market is already severely fatigued by "AI has improved again" headlines.

Why?

Because the capital market stopped buying "pie in the sky" long ago.

Over the past two years, the AI story has been told countless times—stronger models, faster inference, more parameters. Every launch triggers a hype cycle, and every hype cycle ends in a mess.

This time, GPT-5.6's release has a fatal detail: it's not widely available yet. For now, only a few "trusted partners" have preview access. At the U.S. government's request, all trial access requires individual approval. OpenAI used over 700k A100-equivalent GPU hours for safety testing.

The strongest model is out of reach for almost everyone.

Mythos 5 is the same—the Fable 5 public version remains "indefinitely postponed."

The best AI is locked up. What does this mean for the capital market? It means the pace of commercialization has been interrupted. The anticipated revenue explosion is delayed.

Citigroup directly downgraded tech stock weights, concerned that AI investment returns won't meet expectations. What the market truly fears isn't AI losing growth space, but a slowdown in AI capital expenditure, a deceleration in tech iteration, and below-expectations application adoption.

But here's the weird part—

AI chip stocks are falling, while AI tokens are rising.

On the day GPT-5.6 was released, SOL surged about 9% in a single day. The reason is laughably absurd—because OpenAI named its flagship model "Sol," homonymous with Solana. Just that simple naming coincidence was enough to pump the price 9%.

NEAR, TAO, WLD and other AI concept tokens have risen by varying degrees over the past month. The AI narrative is draining liquidity from meme coins.

Money is fleeing traditional markets while rushing into crypto markets.

What does this show? It shows that the pricing logic of the two markets has completely diverged—

Traditional institutions look at EPS, ROI, cash flow. No matter how strong AI is, if it can't generate revenue, it's just a decoration.

Crypto gamblers chase narrative, sentiment, and liquidity. No matter how hyped AI is, a story is enough to pump.

"The decline in AI chip stocks is capital voting with its feet—

They don't believe 'stronger models' will translate into 'more profits.'

The rise in AI tokens is gamblers all-inning with their lives—

They bet the 'AI narrative' can still lure in another wave of suckers."

So will this model launch actually boost the AI sector?

My judgment: Yes, but only "crypto AI," not "traditional AI."

Traditional AI stocks are already dominated by "sell the news"—Broadcom's Q2 revenue grew 48% year-on-year, AI semiconductor revenue grew 143%, and it still got hammered. The market demands exceeding expectations, not "meeting expectations." The releases of GPT-5.6 and Mythos 5 were fully expected, even weaker than expectations due to regulatory restrictions.

But crypto AI is different. The crypto market is far from fatigued by the "AI progress" narrative—AI sector market cap hasn't really taken off yet. As long as there's a story to tell, money dares to rush in.

But I should remind you: OpenAI's rumored IPO delay once triggered a sharp drop in AI tokens. Narrative-driven rallies come fast and go faster.

My strategy (pure sharing, not advice):

AI chip stocks: Don't rush to buy the dip. The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index dropped 5.3% in one day. This isn't the bottom; it's a falling mid-cycle. Wait for ROI logic to repair, wait for the market to shift from "indiscriminate buying" to "rational performance-demanding phase."

AI crypto tokens: Short-term trading is possible, but don't hold long. SOL pumped 9% because of a name collision—how many days can that logic hold? Narratives can make you rich, but they can also make you poor.

Keep an eye on one core variable: When will Fable 5 be fully unblocked? That's the public version of Mythos 5. Once it's fully released, that's the real "commercialization landing" signal—then watch the market reaction. That'll be more accurate than any analysis now.

"The market doesn't pay for 'known progress,'

It pays for 'unexpected surprises.'

GPT-5.6 is strong, but strongly predictable—

Predictable, in the capital market, is boring."#0成本拿2股SK海力士 #美光市值超越Meta跻身全美前十 $BTC $SOL $TAO

$BTC has lost its key support, and every retest is getting rejected.

The bearish structure remains intact, so I'm staying with the trend and looking for short opportunities on #BITCOIN and altcoins.

20K followers on @CoinMarketCap!
2 years. Countless posts. Many lessons. A lot of patience.
Some days the growth was fast. Most days it wasn't.
But consistency beats intensity.
"Slow progress is still progress."
Thank You everyone!

Recently, I’ve tried quite a few AI Agents and looked at many projects about Agents. The more I see, the more I feel that what truly limits AI might no longer be model capabilities, but memory.

Most current Agents share a common problem: every time a new session starts, it’s almost like starting from scratch.

Bugs resolved yesterday, documents sorted, plans discussed, even your usage habits—none of it really stays. Many times, we’re not collaborating with AI, but repeatedly feeding it context.

That’s why, when I recently came across EverOS, I found this direction more interesting than simply competing on model parameters.

Instead of building yet another Agent, it builds a Memory OS behind the Agent—an infrastructure dedicated to managing long-term memory.

One thing I really appreciate is that it doesn’t treat Memory as a completely opaque black box.

EverOS stores all memories as Markdown, which can be viewed and edited locally, and version-controlled with Git. Under the hood, it uses Markdown + SQLite + LanceDB for retrieval and indexing, eliminating the need for additional complex components like MongoDB or Redis. For developers, when something goes wrong, you know where to look; if you want to modify something, you don’t have to guess what the model stored. This readable, controllable design feels more important than simply improving recall rate.

Also, it separates User Memory and Agent Memory into two independent growth paths—a pretty reasonable approach.

User information, preferences, and history make up one part; the experience, processes, and skills that the Agent summarizes during long-term use make up another. The two don’t mix. As usage increases, some repetitive tasks can gradually solidify into reusable Skills, instead of rewriting prompts every time.

Compared to many memory products that stay at the “store—retrieve—recall” level, EverOS draws my attention to its later concepts: Knowledge Wiki, Reflection, and Dreaming.

Simply put, it allows the Agent not only to remember what happened, but also to organize past knowledge into a continuously accumulating knowledge base, summarize experiences and extract patterns during idle time, and turn recurring problems into new capabilities. This approach is more like how humans learn, rather than just performing an information query.

I can’t say EverOS will definitely become the future standard, but at least it offers a direction I agree with: Memory shouldn’t just be a database, but rather the foundation for an Agent’s continuous growth.

In the future, whether it’s Claude Code, Codex, or various Coding Agents, Research Agents, Personal AIs—what truly determines the user experience ceiling may not be a few percentage points of model improvement, but who can truly own a set of transferable, accumulative, and evolvable long-term memory.

If you’ve also been following Agents, LLM applications, or AI Infra recently, I think this project is worth bookmarking.

⭐ GitHub:

I suggest starring it first, then when you have time, check out the README and overall architecture. At least among the open-source Memory projects I’ve seen recently, it’s one of the few that is both well-thought-out and close to real development scenarios.

Trump bombs Iran while saying "keep talking" — and the market actually believes it?

U.S. warplanes have already bombed targets inside Iran.

Missile and drone storage facilities. Coastal radar stations.

Trump himself said: Iran launched attack drones at ships in the Strait of Hormuz, "violating the ceasefire agreement."

Then he said: Negotiations are still expected to continue.

Listen to that — they hit you, and then they want to talk. Do you believe it?

The market does.

Oil prices didn't spike. Bitcoin didn't crash. Everything is business as usual.

How long can this "fight while talking" act go on?

A 60-day nuclear negotiation window. Both sides just signed a memorandum of understanding in Birgen, pledging to continue talks.

Then right after — U.S. airstrikes on Iran.

Iranian senior official Aziz's retaliation also came: The U.S. violation of the ceasefire is "reckless," and Iran "will make them back down and regret it as always."

Both sides are testing the limits.

Trump is testing: After I hit you, can you still sit at the negotiating table?

Iran is testing: After I attacked the ships, besides bombing a few radar stations, do you dare to go further?

Why didn't the market react?

Because everyone has learned to "selectively believe."

WTI crude fell below $70, Brent fell below $72, both posting weekly declines of over 9%. Traffic through the Strait of Hormuz is speeding up, and large amounts of Middle Eastern oil are returning to the market.

Where did the money go? It went to trade "supply recovery," not "war escalation."

Bitcoin? Fell below 60k. Leveraged longs were liquidated for about $450 million in 60 minutes.

The market isn't ignoring the conflict — the market is already numb.

This script of "fighting and talking" has been running from February to June, and the audience is tired.

But numbness is the most dangerous state.

Both sides just set up a communication hotline for the Strait of Hormuz, with the next round of technical talks scheduled for June 30 in Switzerland.

The hotline is open, and warplanes are flying.

The negotiation table is set, and missiles are being launched.

What is this called?

This is called "controlled uncontrollability."

Both sides are pretending the situation is under control — until one day, a ship sinks, a soldier dies, an airstrike hits the wrong target — and then everything goes completely out of control.

For the crypto market, the real risk is not "the conflict has arrived."

It's "you think the conflict is over."

Bitcoin's performance in geopolitical crises increasingly resembles a risk asset, not a safe haven. What does this mean? It means once the framework of "fight while talking" collapses, BTC is likely to tumble along with risk assets, not take off like gold.

After the U.S.-Iran conflict erupted at the end of February, Bitcoin fell from 73,000 to below 60,000 within weeks.

Same script, don't expect a different ending.

"Peace is the script on the table; chaos is the bottom card of geopolitics. The market chooses to believe 'keep talking' because no one is yet willing to believe 'total collapse.'"

But remember:

A communication hotline cannot save a cargo ship hit by a missile.

The 60-day window is not a safe period — it's a countdown.#0成本拿2股SK海力士 #美光市值超越Meta跻身全美前十 $BTC $BZ $CL

If you truly believe in BTC, then go buy MicroStrategy’s old man’s STRC. The face value is 100, and it’s only 76 now—meaning you spend 76 dollars to buy BTC worth 100. And you can also get 1 dollar in interest every month.
If you don’t dare to buy, then don’t say you believe in BTC.