Square
Following
Hot
News
Notifications
Profile
Share your thoughts
placeholder
Article
$AKE Went all-in at 0.0025, got it right—cashing out as soon as it triples
post-image
AKE+6.07%
How to Find Support and Resistance Levels: Practical Ways to Identify Key BTC Buying and Selling Zones

In BTC trading, many people study candlestick charts every day, yet often run into the same question: Where might the price encounter resistance, and where might it find support?

In fact, support and resistance levels are essential basic tools in technical analysis.

First, look at historical highs and lows. If BTC has repeatedly stopped falling and rebounded in a certain price area, that area may form support. Conversely, if the price has repeatedly risen to a certain level and then pulled
post-image
BTC-0.67%
Trenches
mihao
m
bade
b
mihao
4Cxj...pump
Market Cap
$.
Change
.
24h Vol
$.
Holders
.
AGT
A
bade
b
AGT
0x5d...e274
Market Cap
$.
Change
.
24h Vol
$.
Holders
.
FOOD
F
bade
b
FOOD
FTu5...pump
Market Cap
$.
Change
.
24h Vol
$.
Holders
.
IDOL
I
bade
b
IDOL
0x3b...ab07
Market Cap
$.
Change
.
24h Vol
$.
Holders
.
AI
A
bade
b
AI
2T56...pump
Market Cap
$.
Change
.
24h Vol
$.
Holders
.
Why do large orders sometimes need to be executed in batches? Is splitting an order always more cost-effective?

In the crypto market, placing a large order all at once may not be the best option. The order may consume liquidity across multiple price levels, causing the average execution price to deviate from expectations. As a result, some traders may consider splitting a large order into several smaller ones.

But splitting orders is not a sure-fire way to save money. It addresses execution challenges; it does not guarantee trading profits.

First, why might a large order affect the executio
post-image
Why Do You Always Call the Direction Right but Still Fail to Make Money?

In crypto trading, there is a particularly frustrating situation:

You correctly predict that BTC will rise, but end up making no money; you spot a downtrend in advance, yet your account still takes a loss.

Why do you still fail to make money even when you get the direction right?

In fact, predicting the direction is only one part of trading. What really determines the outcome also includes your entry price, position size, stop-loss settings, and execution discipline.

First, timing your entry is crucial. Suppose BTC r
BTC-0.65%
Why Do Larger Losses Make It Harder to Break Even? Understanding the True Cost of Account Drawdowns

In cryptocurrency trading, many people focus especially on how much a trade can earn, but rarely take the time to calculate how much their account needs to rise to return to its original level after a loss.

This is one of the risks most easily overlooked in trading.

Suppose your account originally has 1000 USDT. After a 10% loss, you have 900 USDT left. To get back to 1000 USDT, you need a gain of 11.1%, not 10%.

If the loss reaches 20%, your account is left with 800 USDT, and you need a 25%
post-image
Why Does the Liquidation Price Usually Move Closer to the Entry Price as Leverage Increases?

In crypto futures trading, leverage allows traders to open larger notional positions with less margin, but it also magnifies the impact of price movements on account equity.

Many people know that higher leverage means greater risk, but may not understand why: why can even a small price move put a highly leveraged position at risk of liquidation?

First, leverage changes the relationship between margin and position size.

Suppose you use 100 USDT in margin. For simplicity, fees and other adjustments a
post-image
🔹Buy the Dip or Sell the Rally on Nvidia? Tom Lee Calls for Buying the Dip, While Michael Burry War
live-cover
LIVE1,596
#GateIPOAccessAnthropic
#Gate直通IPO第三期Anthropic,
#ShareWeekly
Gate IPO Access Meets Anthropic: A New Gateway to the Future of Artificial Intelligence Investment
The future of artificial intelligence is no longer just about technological innovation. It is increasingly becoming a major force in global financial markets, institutional investment, and the next generation of digital infrastructure. Gate is taking another significant step in this direction with the launch of Gate IPO Access Phase 3, featuring Anthropic (ANT).
This development represents an important connection between the rapidly
  • 2
Everyone says institutions are scooping up $HYPE , but the market is up just 1.2% and isn't buying it. I'm bearish.

There’s been talk this morning that Hyperliquid turned things around in Q3 thanks to yield on its USDC reserves, with institutions scooping up $HYPE. Is the market buying it? No—I’m bearish.

$HYPE is now at 72.37, up just +1.2% over 24h, with a volume ratio of only 0.987—I don't trust a low-volume rebound.

First, the trend is ugly—7d -7.78%, 30d -10.45%, daily RSI at 36.2, and the MACD has been in a death cross below the zero line for 6 days;

Second, the big guy is already do
HYPE+0.24%
$ZEC Strongly bullish: ZEC is nearing a key support zone after a sharp pullback. A bullish rebound could drive the price back toward higher resistance levels—if buyers regain control of the market, substantial profits may lie ahead. Long $ZECEntry: 930–945Stop-loss: 875Take-profit 1: 970Take-profit 2: 995Take-profit 3: 1,020Take-profit 4: 1,045Trade here $ZEC : 👇
post-image
ZEC+1.16%
Why Do Large Orders Sometimes Need to Be Executed in Batches? Is Splitting an Order Always More Cost-Effective?

In the cryptocurrency market, placing a large order all at once may not be the best choice. The order may consume liquidity across multiple price levels, causing the average execution price to deviate from expectations. As a result, some traders may consider splitting a large order into several smaller trades.

But splitting orders is not a surefire way to profit; it addresses execution, not guaranteed trading returns.

First, why can large orders affect execution prices?

Liquidity
post-image
The Fear & Greed Index has fallen to 20. Can ETH still be bought? Yes, but use a stop-loss.
$ETH The current price is 1952.76, down 4.84% over 24h. MA5=1940.32 remains below MA20=1981.15, and the MACD histogram at -2.321 continues to signal bearish momentum; the trend has not yet reversed. However, sentiment has entered the extreme fear zone (20), while the funding rate of -0.0003% indicates rising short-side crowding. This combination often corresponds to a local bottom rather than an accelerating decline. BTC weakness is the main drag. ETH has followed the broader market lower, finding suppo
post-image
TIA-0.60%
GRAM-0.97%
Many traders analyzing BTC price action focus only on candlesticks and trading volume, while overlooking a very important metric: order book depth.

The order book records the number of buy and sell orders at different price levels in the market, helping us observe the current state of buy and sell orders.

So, how should you read order book depth?

First, observe the size of the bids and asks. If there are many buy orders in a certain price range, that area may have potential buying support; if a large number of sell orders cluster above, they may create short-term price pressure.

Second, wa
post-image
BTC-0.67%
$DODOX I caught this bullish candle, but only got half the move. I entered at 0.0242 yesterday, looking at a 4-hour breakout above the previous high of 0.0238 on increased volume, with a MACD golden cross above the zero line. Volume of 62.8M backed up the breakout. Today it surged to 0.0302, so I placed a sell order at 0.0298 and exited. Now it’s moving sideways at 0.0293—can’t really say I sold too early, but my mindset while holding was clearly getting impatient, afraid of giving back profits. Typical bear-market thinking I haven’t shaken off yet.
One lesson: hold breakout trades; don’t let
  • 2
📢 Signal Card Repost | Source: BlackFrame
Asset: $PUMP Short entry: 0.003393 Stop-loss: 0.003537 Targets: 0.003249 / 0.003105 / 0.002997 Time: Not specified
Come to think of it, we reposted BlackFrame’s $RAM trade earlier today, and here it is again. Does this trader have a signal wholesale department or what? 😂
Sis is just reposting the signals as-is. Whether they work out, whether to follow them, and how much to put in are all up to you, dear followers. You can watch the market, but don’t lend out your brain. 💅
Shared for personal record-keeping; not investment advice. #NBISQ3营收同比增长571%
post-image
PUMP-0.99%
RAM+0.63%
NBIS-16.96%
Many traders see BTC trading volume suddenly surge and assume the market is about to reverse. In reality, a surge in trading volume does not mean a trend reversal. It more often indicates that market participation is increasing and that disagreement between buyers and sellers may be intensifying.

So, how should we interpret a sudden surge in trading volume?

First, rising volume in an uptrend. If prices continue to rise while trading volume keeps increasing, it indicates strong market participation and possibly new capital entering the market. But if prices become increasingly difficult to pu
post-image
BTC-0.67%
#Gate直通IPO第三期Anthropic

Unbeatable subscription signals🧭
All 4 trades have hit take-profit!

Waiting for opportunities to keep trading. CPI is also coming tonight; my personal view is a spike followed by a pullback.

$ETH ‌
ETH-1.23%
  • 3
  • 2
Why Is Position Sizing More Important Than Simply Reducing Leverage?

In cryptocurrency trading, when people think about reducing risk, they often first think of lowering leverage. But a more important question is often overlooked: how large a position have you actually opened, and how much could this trade potentially cost your account at most?

Leverage determines how capital is used, while position size directly affects how price movements impact profit and loss. Simply lowering leverage without controlling position size does not necessarily reduce risk effectively.

First, actual risk expo
post-image
#JensenHuangResigns #ShareWeekly
NVIDIA’s leadership transition has become one of the biggest technology stories of November 2026. The company confirmed that Jensen Huang resigned as President, CEO and board member with immediate effect on November 12. CFO Colette Kress has taken over as interim CEO, while the board searches for a permanent successor.

The market is now weighing two different questions: can NVIDIA keep delivering world-leading AI computing, and can its next leadership team maintain the confidence of customers employees and investors?

1. NVIDIA STOCK PRICE AND MARKET CAPITALI
NVDA-4.49%
  • 3
Load More

Join 40 M users in our growing community

⚡️ Join 40 M users in the crypto craze discussion

💬 Engage with your favorite top creators

👍 See what interests you

Trending Topics

JensenHuangResigns

516.7K Views8.1K Discussing

Jensen Huang has resigned as NVIDIA CEO and stepped down from the board. CFO Colette Kress will serve as interim CEO while NVIDIA considers internal and external successors. $NVDA fell more than 10% in premarket trading following the announcement. With one of AI’s most influential leaders stepping aside, markets are now reassessing NVIDIA’s leadership stability, AI strategy, and long-term valuation.

GateIPOAccessAnthropic

280.8K Views2.6K Discussing

Dr.HanOxfordUnionSpeech

144.6K Views457 Discussing

View More