Share your thoughts
placeholder
Article
#晒出我的持仓收益 First time buying options—am I going to zero? o(´^`)o$BTC
post-image
BTC-3.83%
I had already finished complaining to my friends about this week’s market action, but now I have to take it all back. A little awkward.
A few afternoons ago, $ETH ’s long position held after the pullback, buying strengthened, and I signaled opening a long around 1883.20. Now at 2398.79, +4758.96% secured—what a takeoff. Those who got on board should be laughing in their sleep.
Take 80% profit first, and protect the remaining 20% at the entry price. Don’t get greedy for the last bite; put the bulk in your pocket first.
Panic comes from having no plan; losses come from overthinking. Don’t lose y
post-image
ETH-5.53%
SNDK-1.57%
XRP-10.83%
The protection level hasn't broken, so I'll continue holding this trade. $BR The rebound into the key level zone earlier lacked sufficient support, and the key level failed to move higher, so I took a bearish position. After entering, there were pullbacks, but each was weaker than the last, indicating that selling pressure remains.

After unrealized profit reached +792.41%, I took profit on 80% first and let the remaining 20% run. As long as price does not reclaim the key level, the bearish structure remains; once it is reclaimed, the original thesis is invalidated, and I will close the remai
post-image
BR-52.51%
DOGE-4.91%
BNB-1.51%
$ON This big bullish candle completely wrecked me.
The Fed minutes turned hawkish last night, with the dot plot showing expectations for rate cuts this year falling from three to one. All three major US stock indexes closed lower, while the Dollar Index surged straight to 105.6. Going by the usual script, crypto should have knelt alongside risk assets. I watched BTC move sideways at 67K, figuring the altcoins were bound to get slaughtered. $ON At the time, it was hovering around 0.145, with 24h volume barely above 3M, as quiet as a convenience store at 3 a.m. I placed a short at 0.142 with a s
ON+17.70%
BTC-3.83%
ETH-5.51%
USIDX+0.17%
$POWER Signal】Long + 1H momentum cooling/negative funding rate short squeeze
$POWER The 4H MACD bullish histogram has contracted to 0.0053, while the 1H histogram has fallen to zero, indicating cooling upward momentum; RSI is 70.59 on 4H and 58.63 on 1H, with overbought pressure carrying over to the short term. The funding rate is -0.0244%, meaning short positions are paying; OI is stable, and the price is holding above 0.18, with short-squeeze fuel still intact. The order book bid/ask ratio is 0.98, with a depth imbalance of -1.02%; sell orders are relatively heavy above, while buying suppor
post-image
POWER+31.93%
BTC-3.83%
ETH-5.51%
SOL-5.84%
Everyone, keep enjoying it and keep feasting! Every day, we're either feasting or on our way to feast—this feeling is truly wonderful😁
Sorry, we failed.
As expected, the CLARITY Act failed to pass, with the final vote ending in a 50 VS 50 tie.
Simply put, the bill would classify cryptocurrencies, determine which fall under the SEC’s jurisdiction and which under the CFTC’s, and establish the rules exchanges must follow to register.
After being dragged out for more than a year, it’s starting to feel a bit like the ETF saga back then.
Promise me: after today’s drop, it can’t drop again tomorrow when the FOMC raises interest rates. 🥹
post-image
CLARITY Act Stalls — Uncertainty Stays
The U.S. Senate failed to advance the CLARITY Act, falling short of the 60 votes required.
BTC, ETH, SOL and $XRP came under pressure as markets reacted to the setback.
The bigger signal: stablecoin rules now have a federal framework, but broader crypto market structure remains unresolved.
Garlinghouse argues crypto can keep building without CLARITY.
Maybe. But institutional capital still needs regulatory visibility.
The bill is stalled.
The demand for clarity isn’t.
#Crypto #Regulation #MarketStructure
post-image
XRP-10.80%
Crypto + stock market update
live-cover
LIVE61
58 down and 10 up across the market, VTHO surges 20%: an independent move that even short sellers paying fees cannot suppress
What a move—amid a defensive market with 58 down and 10 up, $VTHO went against the trend and surged 20.156%. I’m bullish here; buy the dip on a pullback.
Current price: 0.000769, volume ratio 3.868; the latest three 15m volumes were 133 million, 142 million, and 188 million, while the average volume in the previous hour was only 64 million.
First, the funding rate is -0.00191054, meaning shorts are paying every 8 hours and still cannot suppress the price. Second, the da
VTHO+19.80%
LATEST: 🇺🇸 Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse says he still sees "reason for optimism" after the CLARITY Act failed its cloture vote, as SEC and CFTC are set to fill the legislative gap through rulemaking.
#CLARITYActKeyVoteAhead
##FedAnnounceRateDecisionSoon
  • 6
  • 1
$BTC is testing $75.5K after a 4.14% pullback.
Holding $75K keeps a recovery toward $78K and $80K possible. A clean loss of this level could expose the $73K region.
No need to predict. Let the reaction at support confirm direction.
#BTC #Bitcoin،
post-image
BTC-3.83%
  • 5
  • 2
Gate's growth rate ranks first globally, and it's not just about one number
Recently, one piece of market data has drawn attention: CryptoQuant data shows that Gate's spot trading volume ranks among the global Top 3, while its 30-day spot growth reached +667%, ranking first globally. Its futures trading volume growth also ranks among the global Top 3.
What's interesting about this data set is that rankings measure current scale, while growth rates measure the direction of change. Once an exchange reaches a certain size, maintaining rapid growth becomes more difficult because the base is alread
post-image
49 to 50, the Senate postponed crypto’s “clarity” again: $PLUME The low-volume slide isn’t over
Well, 9 hours ago, in a 49-to-50 vote, the Senate killed CLARITY in a procedural vote. $PLUME It continued sliding on declining volume after the event—I’m only bearish at this level.
One sentence on the event: the regulatory classification bill received 49 votes in favor and 50 against, falling one vote short of advancing by majority. Bessent’s calls were in vain.
Think through the transmission chain before acting. First, the compliance path remains uncertain, giving institutions one less reason t
PLUME-6.08%
#CLARITY法案關鍵投票在即 #Gate广场中秋团圆局 #CLARITYAct
A Full Moon, A Failed Vote, and Why I Am Still Bullish After CLARITY
Last night I was watching the full moon with my family, and at the same time watching the Senate live count on my phone. At 02 15 UTC plus 8, the CLARITY Act procedural vote came in. 49 to 50. Failed.
Everyone in the comments was shouting bearish. I think the opposite. Let me explain why this 49-50 failure is actually a gift for traders like us on Gate.
First, what really happened in Washington
The Senate needed 60 votes to move forward. This is called cloture. Republicans have 53
XAUUSD-0.10%
XTIUSD-0.15%
XBRUSD+1.97%
XAGUSD+0.08%
META+0.71%
  • 4
$AIN Signal】Long + 1H pullback support/4H trend continuation
$AIN The 1H MACD histogram has turned negative and expanded, while the 4H MACD bullish histogram is contracting; order-book depth near 0.18178 is recovering, and the 1H Bollinger upper band at 0.2028 forms distant resistance. RSI 4H is 92.62, indicating crowded chasing; RSI 1H is 65.00, with support still present on the pullback. Depth imbalance is 7.98%, with a Bid/Ask ratio of 1.17, showing active buying support below. OI is stable and the funding rate is 0.0043%, indicating that long leverage is not overheated. This trade has a 1
post-image
AIN+41.82%
BTC-3.83%
ETH-5.51%
SOL-5.84%
$AIN Signal】Long + above the 1H EMA20, with slightly thicker bids in the order book
$AIN 4H RSI 92.62, 1H RSI 65, price above the 1H EMA20 at 0.1693, order book bid-to-ask ratio 1.17, with bids slightly thicker. The 1H MACD histogram at -0.0022 continues to expand, the 4H MACD red histogram is narrowing, OI is stable, and the funding rate is 0.0043%. The current price of 0.18178 is near the upper boundary of the entry range, so the strategy is mainly to accumulate through limit orders. Risk-reward ratio 1.5, with the stop-loss distance close to 5% and a clearly defined risk boundary.
🎯Direct
post-image
AIN+41.82%
Stablecoins must not pay interest, and regulators are also targeting exchanges: I’m only bearish on ENA at this level
Half an hour ago, the GENIUS Act targeted exchange yield channels, with $ENA sitting at 0.1396, 24h -5%—I won’t catch a falling knife; I’m only looking short.
One sentence on the event—the GENIUS Act prohibits issuers from paying yield to holders, and Section 404 specifically targets disguised interest payments by exchanges and affiliated parties.
The transmission occurs in three steps. First, legislation has boxed in issuers’ deposit-taking channels; second, exchanges’ stable
ENA-3.31%
Crypto + stock market update
live-cover
LIVE40
#GateSquareMidAutumnReunion
The CLARITY Act vote is over, and the important part for crypto traders is not simply that the bill failed. It is how the market reacted before, during and immediately after the vote — because that price action tells us what traders had already priced in and what they are still worried about.
The U.S. Senate voted 49–50 against advancing the CLARITY Act, falling short of the 60 votes required for the procedural motion. The bill was designed to establish a federal framework for digital assets and clarify the respective roles of the SEC and CFTC. Republicans had rele
post-image
BTC-3.83%
ETH-5.53%
  • 3
Load More

Join 40 M users in our growing community

⚡️ Join 40 M users in the crypto craze discussion

💬 Engage with your favorite top creators

👍 See what interests you

Trending Topics

CLARITYActKeyVoteAhead

147.75k Views6.92k Discussing

The U.S. Senate will hold a key procedural vote on the CLARITY Act on September 15, requiring 60 votes to advance with Republicans holding 53 seats. Kalshi data shows the odds of passage this year have fallen to 25%, with ethics provisions and stablecoin yield still unresolved. What would advancing the bill mean for crypto markets?

GateTopsGlobalGrowth

23.66k Views1.1k Discussing

FedAnnounceRateDecisionSoon

31.64k Views3.59k Discussing

View More