Ethereum’s Silent Crisis: Core Devs Paid Half What They’re Worth

A survey by Protocol Guild reveals Ethereum core developers are significantly underpaid, earning a median of $140,000 annually compared to market offers of $300,000.

Risks to the Ethereum Protocol

A recent survey by Protocol Guild, an independent funding organization, has revealed a significant pay disparity for Ethereum‘s core developers. The report found that these developers are earning roughly half of the cash compensation available to them in the open market, confirming a long-held belief that they are underpaid relative to industry benchmarks.

According to the findings, developers earn a median cash compensation of $140,000 per year, compared to potential recruitment offers of $300,000. This leaves an average compensation gap of $160,000. In addition to insufficient cash, most respondents also lack meaningful risk-based compensation, such as equity or token grants, with only 37% receiving any from their current employers.

The report meanwhile outlines the potential risks posed by this compensation gap, warning that underpaying developers can have a significant impact on the Ethereum protocol. The issues identified include limited talent acquisition which hinders Ethereum’s ability to compete for top talent, narrowing the available pool of skilled developers.

The pay gap can lead to higher developer turnover, weaken the “political economy” of Ethereum and making institutional memory less robust. Lower compensation could slow down the delivery of Ethereum upgrades and make core developers more susceptible to influence payments.

Protocol Guild’s Role in Retaining Talent

Protocol Guild, which supports approximately 190 Ethereum core developers, asserts that its contributions are crucial for retaining talent. The organization claims to have distributed a median of $67,121 to its member developers over the last 12 months. With cumulative distributions totaling $33 million since May 2022, Protocol Guild is now a leading funder of Ethereum core developers.

This assertion is supported by anonymous developers who credit the distributions for their continued work on Ethereum.

“If I weren’t in PG [Protocol Guild], I would more seriously consider offered positions,” one anonymous developer said. “Despite PG income not being significant today, I’m optimistic that in the future it can close the gap enough to not feel I’m making a big compromise.”