Targets fully hit! Bitcoin captured 2,800 points!

Brothers who were still buying the dip in the sideways market over the weekend—did this move wake you up?

Looking back at yesterday’s publicly shared trade idea: short near 76,300. The price rebounded to a high of 76168, then sold off through the early morning, hitting a low of 73333. The full 2,800-point move was captured!

I made it clear at the time: Bitcoin’s drop from 81188 to 74810 slowing down didn’t mean a reversal. The sideways action was just a correction; don’t mistake catching your breath for getting ready to take off.

The direct

Feeling great. I’ll never bet against BLG again in my life 🫡
Basically a 3:0—I bet on them four games in a row. Made a little profit.

On Nov. 9, BTC’s rebound is facing resistance around 75,500. Look for a move down to 74,000/73,300.

For those looking to go long, wait for price to stabilize near 73,300 before entering. Set a stop at 72,800, with targets at 74,500/75,000.

On the 1-hour chart, price has plunged from the high of 81,188. The previous consolidation support at 75,800 has given way. After briefly dipping to 73,333, price rebounded.

However, the moving averages remain bearishly aligned, and 75,000/75,500 are short-term resistance. For now, treat the rebound as a corrective bounce. $BTC #BTC

America's emergency oil reserve just hit 282M barrels. Lowest since 1982.
Middle East crude exports are back to 98% of pre-war levels. Diesel and gasoline? Just 58%.
Here's the part markets are missing.... Oil is moving, but usable fuel is still constrained. And America's emergency cushion is running dangerously thin.
I think the next oil shock could hit consumers harder than investors expect.
When reserves run low, prices become the last line of defense.

ETH's plan for today | Consider shorting near 2145; geopolitical tensions are escalating, so look to short the rebound first!

ETH fell to a low near 2050 early this morning and has now rebounded to around 2140. The short-term trend remains relatively weak.

On the news front, Trump said the US has three aircraft carriers deployed in the region, with the third having just arrived. The US-Iran military standoff remains a key market focus.

Rising geopolitical risks could weigh on market risk appetite. Given ETH's high-volume decline early this morning and the rebound's limited strength so far,

Subscribe to the livestream: Trade until your hands are sore

Gold short stopped out at 10 points, then reversed to long: gains of 45 points and up
$XAU ‌
ETH short-term trades are there for the taking
$ETH ‌
$XAUUSD ‌

Can NVDA take off again? After the Jensen Huang controversy, NVIDIA stock faces three scenarios!

This latest controversy surrounding NVIDIA has reminded investors once again that the biggest risks for tech giants sometimes don't come from competitors, but may also stem from uncertainty around corporate governance, regulation, and management.
So, where will NVDA go next? Three possible market scenarios are worth watching.
First: The negative news gradually gets priced in. If an independent investigation finds no confidential information leaks or major compliance issues, Jensen Huang continues

Why Can You Still Lose Money Even When You Correctly Predict the Direction?

You predict that Bitcoin will rise and buy in. The price does rise.

But you still lose money.

Why?

Correctly predicting the direction is only part of a successful trade. Your entry price, stop-loss distance, position size, trading costs, and risk-reward ratio can all determine the final outcome.

Getting the market direction right does not mean the trade will necessarily make money.

I. Why Can You Lose Money Even When You Correctly Predict the Direction?

Suppose you predict that BTC will rise.

You buy at $100,00

How Can You Read the Balance of Power Between Bulls and Bears in BTC Trading?
In BTC trading, many people think bulls have the upper hand when prices rise, and that bears have taken control of the market when prices fall. But the real battle between bulls and bears cannot be understood simply by looking at whether a candlestick is red or green; you need to observe the relationship between price, trading volume, and market structure.
So, how can you tell which side is currently taking the initiative?
First, observe the price structure. If BTC keeps forming higher highs and higher lows, it means

$GNC Its market cap is only a few thousand dollars, yet it's worth tens of thousands. Such an inexpensive project. Could its value still be below the high barrier to entry.

Why might repeatedly adjusting parameters actually make a trading strategy more fragile?

Many traders go through this process when optimizing a strategy:

The first backtest shows average returns.

After adjusting the parameters, returns improve.

Further adjustments lead to a higher win rate, smaller drawdowns, and an increasingly attractive equity curve.

So you feel you have finally found a better strategy.

But when the strategy enters a new market environment, its performance quickly deteriorates.

The problem may not be that the parameters are still insufficiently refined, but rather th

Why isn’t a trading strategy with a higher win rate necessarily more profitable than one with a lower win rate?

Many traders have an intuition: the higher the win rate, the stronger the trading ability, and the more money they should make.

But in real trading, this assumption often proves wrong.

Some strategies win seven out of ten trades, yet the account keeps shrinking; others win only three or four out of ten, but may perform better over the long term.

Why?

Because long-term trading performance depends not only on the win rate, but also on average profits, average losses, trading costs

Why do many trading strategies perform steadily in backtests, then suddenly fail when market conditions change?

A trading strategy may have been profitable for several months.

It may perform well in trending markets, with a beautiful backtest curve. But when the market enters a choppy phase or liquidity suddenly dries up, signals that once worked start failing frequently.

At this point, many people’s first thought is: Were the parameters poorly tuned?

But the problem may not be the parameters at all. It may be that the market conditions the strategy relies on to make money have changed.

I

Jensen Huang hit by sudden controversy! Nvidia falls 2.2% after hours—is the AI chip leader in trouble this time?

Nvidia has recently been at the center of global tech news, but this time not because it launched a new chip. Instead, CEO Jensen Huang has become embroiled in controversy related to personal relationships and potential foreign intelligence activities, and the company's board has announced an independent investigation. After the news broke, Nvidia shares fell as much as about 2.2% after hours. Investors may be too preoccupied with this to even look at graphics cards.
Why is the ma

Just right, neither too high nor too low. Let’s kick off Monday with a strong start: the bullish Bitcoin move has already covered 2,000 points. The market is volatile, so a pullback is inevitable. For the long term, take profits gradually to avoid giving back gains. Watch resistance at 75800 and 76800; a breakout could bring the 80,000 level into view$BTC $ETH #美国10月CPI即将公布

Why Aren’t Limit Orders Always Cheaper Than Market Orders?

Many traders believe that limit orders let them control the execution price, while market orders can incur slippage, so limit orders must always be more cost-effective.

But in real trading, there’s an often-overlooked issue:

A better price doesn’t necessarily mean a better overall trading outcome.

To determine whether an order type is suitable, you need to consider not only the execution price, but also the probability of execution, the cost of waiting, and the cost of missing a trading opportunity.

I. The Biggest Advantage of Lim

A blood-curdling cry: Anyone telling you to buy the dip now is either stupid or bad—not just bad, but downright evil. Who knows what level of the eighteenth-tier hell the bottom is at! Around Chinese New Year, after the Democratic Party takes the stage at the Two Sessions, Bitcoin will definitely be in the 40s. Remember, I’m not saying it’s possible—I’m saying it’s certain.......

On September 24, I started viewing NBIS (Nebius) as showing “wealth growth”; it was then at 243. By today, October 9, “wealth growth” had reached a low of 113.3. It reached the target of 115.9. The “wealth growth” was 53%. Not bad. Will there be more “wealth growth”? I share my thoughts in image 2. [NBIS is an AI computing center; I haven’t been optimistic about it since September 24.] ​​​$NBIS ‌