The Cursor team's iteration speed is there for all to see; Grok @bot is shipping new features almost every day.
The tradeoff, though, is that Cursor-series products are far less available than the Grok series.
Grok Bot went down again today, and judging by the chart, yellow accounts for maybe half the days.

Retail traders in U.S. stocks have really been getting crushed lately. A buddy of mine watches the market every day. A while back, he was keeping an eye on a high-volatility tech ETF whose daily chart looked exactly like a head and shoulders: the left shoulder and head had formed, but the right shoulder wasn’t finished yet. He figured, “It’s already fallen so much—it has to bounce,” and rushed to buy the dip near the neckline. His limit order was less than 2% above the previous low, and he placed his stop just below it, thinking he’d take the loss if it broke. But right after the open, a singl

Google data shows that search queries in AI Mode are three times longer on average than traditional searches, but users’ acceptance of and click-through rates on ads are comparable to those in traditional search.
Users now have to type three times as much and look at more ads. People sure are getting more patient in the AI era.
AI-assisted content creation
$BTC

LIT | Short 🔴 | Bearish | 15-minute, 24-hour: -4.08% | Volume: 37.6M USDT Short rationale: Price is below EMA200; EMA20/50/200 are in bearish alignment; RSI14 is 46.7; MACD histogram is negative; ADX14 is 27.5; volume is 0.68 times the 20-candle average; trend pullback/continuation. Entry price: 2.9546 Stop loss: 3.0822 Take-profit 1: 2.7951 | Take-profit 2: 2.69939 | Take-profit 3: 2.57179 Entry price is for reference only; do not chase the trade. The strategy is invalidated if the stop-loss level is hit. This is a technical analysis strategy only and does not constitute financial advice. $L

GM CT
I think I’m the first person to say GM here

$CHIP Current price 0.04929, down 8.76% over 24h, with a trading volume of 6.8M USDT; MA5 (0.049602) has crossed below MA20 (0.0515945), RSI 39.3 is approaching the weak zone, and the MACD histogram at -0.0002659 remains bearish. The lower Bollinger Band at 0.0468091 is the only visible support for now. Comparing contemporaneous candidates: $XPL is up 4.64% against the trend, with MA5 crossing above MA20 and RSI at 56.1, clearly leading in relative strength; $HAEDAL is down 10.48%, but RSI at 48.2 remains in neutral territory. Its decline is larger, but its structure remains intact. All thr

$ENA : Using price-volume confirmation to find opportunities, with levels and exit lines here
$ENA There’s a very typical debate right now: one side cites the 24-hour -0.62% move as proof of direction, while the other counters with key levels. I’m not taking sides based on the percentage change for now, because the $ENA price has already moved, but trading activity and volume haven’t kept up, so they haven’t given us the full picture. We can provisionally trust the direction, but not assume the move will continue; a move without follow-through can be reversed at any time.
My view is that the di

the-open-network:native has the potential to reach double digits from here! 👀🔥
Keep it on your watchlist. The next move could be interesting!
As always: Good entry + little patience = BIGGER MOVES💰
Buy & Hold.🚀

$PEPE ’s strength and crowding are appearing at the same time; the first pullback will be the real test
The current price of 0.00000506 USDT is like a sheet of paper folded over and over. $PEPE surged from 0.00000457 to 0.00000524 in 24 hours. Behind the +9.85% gain lies a subtler signal: both the 1-hour and 4-hour charts look strong, but trading participation is only 0.05x. This combination of strength and crowding often tests judgment more than a simple rise or fall.
My view: the trend is still strong, but whether buyers show up at these highs matters more than chasing the rally with a story.

Benjamin Cowen warns Bitcoin bears are in control? Key price levels reveal what?
Bitcoin is losing short-term momentum, and analyst Benjamin Cowen says the $83,000 level is now a critical technical threshold. After failing to hold most of its move up to $87,000, Bitcoin closed last week around $82,042. Cowen says another weekly close below $83,000 would make the recent rally look increasingly like a bull trap.
He also flagged that Bitcoin has dropped back below its 50-day moving average, a signal that is appearing across multiple risk assets. Nasdaq, the Dow Jones, Ethereum, and several altcoi

I went out with my girls
In this case, who pays the bill?
Gn

Except for AI Cloud, growth across all of GOOG’s businesses fell short of expectations.
AI Cloud doesn’t seem consumer-facing either; almost all its users are businesses (like Anthropic), after all, who actually uses it?
Google’s earnings report actually says a lot.
Consumer weakness, business contraction.
It just depends on whether you’re willing to see it...

The entry at 4080 was pretty good

this is the 3rd largest company in the world btw

$USDT Dominance sitting right on 6.78%.
When USDT.D is bullish, BTC and ETH go lower. Money is running to stablecoins.
Hold here and the next stop is a sweep of the 7.2% high. Above that is a big liquidity gap from 7.3% up to 8.3%. That's where BTC and ETH could really bleed.
Lose 6.78% and crypto gets room to breathe.
Which way do you think it breaks? 👇

Every time it gets close to 2,500, it can't hold on. My assets stall here. What's going on? I'm losing confidence.

Long $INIT ‼️ Buyers are strongly defending the bottom; the price is expected to rise sharply toward the major liquidity zone above. Entry price: 0.2190 - Current price Take profit: 0.2501 Stop loss: 0.1997 Trade here: $INIT 👇

The Fed’s hawkish signals from early this morning are still reverberating, and inflationary pressures have not truly eased. GDP and PCE data are also due out tonight. When market sentiment is highly aligned, that is often when reversals are most likely to occur—a risk that must be kept in mind.
$BT contracts: long borrowing reached 1324.08 BTC, while short borrowing was only 72.88 BTC;
$ET contracts: longs borrowed 16,100 ETH, while shorts borrowed 856.89 ETH;
$SOL contracts: longs borrowed 106,700 SOL, while shorts borrowed 3412.31 SOL.
Leveraged borrowing data shows that longs significant