Last time the Fed held rates, BTC still dumped 4%.
Today, The market is preparing for a 25 bps hike
And somehow BTC is still fighting around $75K after yesterday’s CLARITY shock
This is either insane strength
or the calm before the FOMC volatility

September 18 Strategy Plan
Priority Ranking, for Regular Followers Only
Execution Priorities for Today
I will execute in the following order of priority:
First choice: Go long after stabilization at 2420–2430
Second choice: Go short if an upward push to 2475–2490 is rejected
Breakout long: The 1-hour chart holds above 2485 and confirms on a pullback
Breakdown short: The 1-hour chart breaks below 2408 and fails to rebound
Middle range of 2440–2465: Stand aside; do not chase trades
If none of the key areas above are reached today, I would rather not trade. So-called “precise levels” can only be

【$SOL Signal】Long + 1H breakout/order-book support
$SOL 1H RSI 62.94; selling pressure above 100.45 was quickly absorbed, with order-book imbalance at 12.23%.
🎯 Direction: Long
⚡ Entry/limit order: 100.1487 - 100.4500
🛑 Stop-loss: 99.4455
🚀 Target 1: 101.9568
🚀 Target 2: 102.7101
🛡️Trade management:
- Execution strategy: Take 50% off at Target 1 and move the stop-loss up to the breakeven level. If the price falls back to the entry level, exit automatically to protect the principal.
Depth logic: The 4H MACD histogram at 0.295 is expanding, while the 1H histogram at 0.1197 is contracting;

Watching the market nonstop got annoying, but once I turned it off, I could see things more clearly. With my eyes no longer glued to it, I stopped feeling anxious.

While the market was bottoming out, $BEAT ’s rebound remained weak, and volume failed to follow. Nobody was taking it higher, so I flagged a BEAT short setup around 0.4692. I didn’t call it too aggressively—those who understood would naturally get it.

It weakened directly afterward, and 0.0858, +1608.09% was secured. That was a satisfying bite of profit; the wait beforehand was worth it.

Take 80% off first, and protect the rem

After $WLFI surged to 0.05824, I instead took 70% off first. It’s not that I’m bearish, but this level is right around the key prior high, so chasing further offers worse risk-reward. The move up from 0.05706 formed a breakout-pullback-breakout structure, with each pullback holding at a higher key level and volume expanding on the breakouts.
The key levels are clear now: the prior high is the first key level. After the breakout, a low-volume pullback that holds the upper boundary would provide a new entry setup; if price merely pushes above it and then falls back, it could be a false breakout.

I’m taking a short on $ETH because price is moving into the 2,480–2,520 supply/resistance zone on the 4H chart.
My setup:
Entry: 2,480–2,520
DCA: 2,520–2,550
TP1: 2,360
TP2: 2,280
TP3: 2,200
SL: Above 2,560
Why I’m bearish: this area has acted as strong resistance, and price is now approaching it again. If ETH gets rejected from 2,480–2,520 and loses the 2,400 support area, I expect downside continuation toward 2,360 first.
The short setup stays valid while price remains below the resistance zone.

Comparing the upside potential of the three veteran POW coins $BCH $LTC
$ETC
in this bull market: BCH has a $4.7 billion market cap, LTC $4.1 billion, and ETC $1.1 billion. BCH is a fork of Bitcoin, LTC is modeled after BTC, and ETC is Ethereum’s native chain. BCH is currently Grayscale’s third-largest holding, but BCH’s shell has been sold to Middle Eastern capital and is no longer operated by Bitmain, which is also why BCH performed so strongly in the previous bull market. LTC is currently Grayscale’s second-largest holding and also has the support of a spot ETF. Although there is basicall

The bullish thesis for $FF can play out, not by guessing the top, but because of consecutive false breakouts at the highs. After the previous high was swept by a wick, the price failed to hold and fell back into the range, indicating that overhead holders are distributing and that buying pressure cannot absorb the supply.
I’m watching for a pullback confirmation. After breaking below the range low, the rebound failed at the range high; the moving averages are starting to turn down, and volume has not increased. This kind of rebound looks more like an opportunity to add to or take profit on sho

After $ARB surged to 0.17653, I instead took 70% off the table first. It’s not that I’m bearish, but this level is right at the key prior-high resistance, making it less cost-effective to keep chasing. The move up from 0.13354 formed a breakout-pullback-breakout structure, with each pullback holding at a higher key level and volume expanding on the breakouts.

The key levels are clear now: the prior high is the first key level. After the breakout, only a low-volume pullback that holds the upper boundary would establish a new entry setup; if it merely pushes above and then falls back, it could

I had already finished complaining to my friends about this week’s market action, but now I have to take it all back—it’s a little awkward.
A few days ago, before bed, I saw $SCRT make another push. Every surge fell just short, with insufficient buying support, so I casually noted that there was no need to rush into SCRT shorts and to wait and see around 0.02694.
I woke up to 0.00772, a direct +1746.74% move. Those who were on board probably woke up laughing. Getting the timing right feels much better than keeping busy for nothing.
Take 80% off the table first, and move the remaining 20% to t

#Bitcoin & 10Y Real Yield Alert ⚡️
📊 The 10Y Real Yield has surged to 2.60, extending deep into restrictive territory above 2.00%. Macro liquidity is contracting following recent Fed tightening.
📍 Historically, elevated real yields drive capital into risk-free Treasuries over non-yielding assets. This places persistent opportunity cost pressure on at ~$76K.
💡 Sustained yield expansion above the red restrictive threshold caps macro upside. Risk of further downside continuation remains elevated.

After $PONS surged to 0.6571, I instead took 70% off first. It’s not that I’m bearish, but this level is right at the key prior-high resistance, making it less cost-effective to keep chasing. The move up from 0.6155 formed a breakout-pullback-breakout structure, with each pullback holding at a higher key level and volume expanding on the breakouts.

The key levels are clear now: the prior high is the first key level. If, after breaking out, price can pull back on declining volume and hold the upper boundary, that would be the new entry setup; if it only surges above it and then falls back, it

$FB Looks like it will definitely drop to 0.3 today

🩸 Nike’s turnaround story is facing another serious test.
$NKE recently traded near $36, around its 52-week low and roughly 12-year lows.
Then came another warning from Wall Street:
Robert W. Baird downgraded Nike from Outperform to Neutral and cut its price target from $70 to $44.
Nike is also set to leave the S&P 100 on September 21, ending an almost 18-year run in the index.
But there’s an important distinction:
Nike is leaving the S&P 100 — not the S&P 500.
The stock will remain in the broader S&P 500.
The bigger issue is what happens next.
Nike’s market value has fallen sharply over the

JUST IN: US equities rally post-rate hike with chips leading; crypto treasury stocks jump while BTC stays rangebound. $BNB , $PURR, $BMNR, $MSTR pushing higher alongside broader crypto-related names.

Who wants to trench with the boys ?
3 trench warriors .
Would pick from cm .

【$ONE Signal】Long + negative funding rate short squeeze / 1H breaks above the upper band
$ONE 1H RSI 87.20, 4H RSI 92.56, with the Bollinger upper band at 0.0019 directly broken by the current price of 0.0020667. Funding rate -2.0000%, with shorts continuously paying. Order book depth imbalance -15.36%, buy/sell ratio 0.73, with relatively heavy sell orders above.
🎯Direction: Long
⚡Entry/limit order: 0.002060500 - 0.002066700
🛑Stop loss: 0.001963365
🚀Target 1: 0.002221702
🚀Target 2: 0.002299204
🛡️Trade management:
- Execution strategy: Reduce the position by 50% after reaching Target 1, a

After $NEAR surged to 3.1274, I instead took 70% off first. It’s not that I’m bearish; this level is right at the key prior-high resistance, making chasing less attractive. The move up from 2.4131 formed a breakout-pullback-breakout structure, with each pullback holding at a higher key level and volume expanding on the breakouts.
The key levels are clear now: the prior high is the first key level. If, after breaking out, the price pulls back on lower volume and holds the upper boundary, that would be the new entry logic; if it only pushes up and then falls back, it could be a false breakout. I