$BTW Up 24.3k%, with $70 million in funds fleeing over three days—couldn’t it dump 99% at any moment?🥶

【Oil Falls Below 100, Memory Chips Take Another Hit: What Is the Market Waiting for on the Last Weekend Before Rate Decision Week】
Saturday evening, crypto markets drifted lower on thin volume, with BTC at 81,613, ETH at 2,435, SOL at 104.72, and gold holding around 4,170. Losses were limited, but the direction was uniform—nobody wanted to add positions over the weekend; everyone is waiting for rate decision week on 10/27-28.
The real news today was in the stock market close: SOXL closed at 94.66, falling below its previous low of 95.23; SNDK retreated to 1,301; SK Hynix was at 926 and MU at 8

Young people don't play fair—they really know how to twist the knife 🤣

#Bitcoin MA Ribbon Alignment 📊
📝 The ribbon displays a "Mixed MA alignment" as Bitcoin trades near ~$82K. Price has reclaimed the 50 SMA (~$80.8K) after a prolonged compression phase.
📍 Key moving averages cluster between ~$71.9K (200 SMA) and ~$74.3K (300 SMA). This dense shelf establishes primary structural support below current price.
💡 Ribbon compression precedes explosive expansion phases. A clean bullish fanning of the shorter SMAs is needed to confirm macro trend continuation. #BTC

AI has just found the vulnerabilities, but the people fixing them have to bring in another thousand workers. So much for helping people save some effort.
Bank of America asked AI to help identify software security vulnerabilities, using models including Mythos from AI company Anthropic. According to the bank’s CEO, the models found a large number of vulnerabilities, and the bank wanted to fix them as quickly as possible, so in the second quarter it brought in 1,000 outsourced engineers to assist its existing approximately 3,000 employees.
That’s a little awkward: it used to be hard to find pro

Hyperliquid

$BTC Evening outlook: 10.17.
The consolidation zone marked by the red box above has broken down. Repeated rebounds failed to break above the 82614 resistance and hold there; a failed attempt to break resistance inevitably leads to a pullback.
The pullback then broke below the 81788 support. After that, there were several attempts to reclaim and trade above 81788 resistance, as indicated by the white arrow above, but they failed. Is there any problem with opening a short here?
No, because it meets the conditions for a short. Which conditions are those?
First, the current trend is down, because

$QNT The prominent influencer Tianlong is about to

Brent crude hits its second-highest level of the year, the Fed’s rate decision looms at month-end, and midterm elections are approaching! Where will the market go?
Waking up to Brent crude nearing $110 and New York crude nearing the $100 mark has dampened the oversold rebound momentum in risk assets, as well as the short- to medium-term rebound demand for gold and silver;
On top of that, this week’s CPI/PPI readings, which far exceeded expectations, have put Trump squarely in the hot seat. There are less than two weeks left in the window. Although he has said he does not intend to eliminate th

$UVXY Up 15.65% in a single day, with the fear index screaming at 18.62. The Fed minutes just came out hawkish, and nonfarm payrolls beat expectations. The 30-day correlation between $VIX and $BTC has flipped to -0.72: risk assets are taking a beating while volatility is feasting. UVXY has surged from 15.84 to 19.65, with trading volume clearly picking up to 40.1M. There’s no on-chain data, but the futures premium structure is widening, signaling that panic-driven buying is still coming in. My thesis: as long as $BTC can’t hold 62k and U.S. tech earnings season delivers a blowup, UVXY has anot

A man who ends up with a wife like this is truly miserable—he’ll be in despair for the rest of his life.

This tech stock pullback has investors doing the math seriously
When AI companies used to announce data center expansions, the market would immediately reward them with higher valuations. Now investors are asking: Where will the money come from? How much will the interest cost? When will the investment pay off?
At the close of U.S. markets on October 16, the Nasdaq 100 was down 5.5% for the week; the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index fell for eight consecutive trading days, with losses totaling 15.7%. Note the distinction: the Nasdaq Composite fell 4.5% this week. This round of chip-sector loss

How I Turned $10 into $6,464 in Just 30 Days — Using Pure Math, Risk Control, and Precision Entries
Most traders blow accounts trying to double money overnight.
I did the opposite — and followed a 25% daily compounding system with surgical discipline.
The result?
💰 $10 ➝ $6,464.63 in 30 Days
📊 30-day Plan — No Leverage, No Hype, Just Pure Math + Execution
🧠 The Strategy: The 25% Rule
Every single day,
📅 Day 1: $10 ➝ $12.50
📅 Day 10: $74.50 ➝ $93.13
📅 Day 20: $694.13 ➝ $867.66
📅 Day 30: $6,464.63 ➝ $8,080.79 (Final Target)
🔎 Why This Works (But 99% Still Fail):
✅ Clear Daily Target — $

NEAR at $5.1, up 100%—would you still dare to chase it?
It doubled in 30 days, an ETF has launched, and Intents has processed over $33 billion—but the price is stuck around $5.1, unable to move either way, and has edged down slightly over the past 24 hours. Is this the last struggle before selling at the highs, or the final shakeout before breaking through $6?
First, the surface picture: good news is out, but the price isn't rising.
NEAR is currently trading in a $5.05-$5.15 range, down 1-2% over 24 hours. It hit an intraday low of $4.92 and a high of $5.36. It gained 100%+ in 30 days, with an

$DOGE /monthly 🔥
#Dogecoin is back on the same long-term trendline that launched it twice before.
❇️ 2017 touch → 3 years later, 2020 touch
❇️ 2020 touch → 6 years later, 2026 touch
Both times, price bounced off the line and surged.
Price is sitting right below it again. Discount prices won't last long—this zone gets sold out fast 🚀
Are you loading up? 👇

$NEAR INTENTS VOLUME IS ONLY THE START OF THE TOKEN STORY
The number I care about comes after the swap: how much revenue does the protocol retain?
Intents fees are shared with ecosystem participants. Revenue-share payouts are denominated in $NEAR, and product revenue has already funded token buybacks.
That creates a connection between usage and the token, but gross trading volume alone doesn’t tell us how strong it is.
My focus is retained revenue, actual buybacks and their size relative to new issuance.
For $NEAR, growing usage becomes more compelling when the economics grow alongside it.