Square
Following
Hot
News
Notifications
Profile

nuelorio

vip
No content yet
Peak Tier VIP 12.4 Year(s)
1
Following
2
Followers
1
Liked
i see i'll take my time reading it at the end of the day
MeaninglessGwei
Why Do Investors Keep Making the Same Mistakes?
This is a good question, but the answer is not mysterious.
First, few investors have experienced investment cycles long enough to recognize the same mistakes from two or three decades ago playing out again.
Second, greed often easily overwhelms caution, leading people to ignore the “old rules”; hope, meanwhile, seems never to fade.
This is especially evident during market booms. Ironically, people’s tendency to ignore the rules often peaks precisely when following them costs them money. As Galbraith pointed out, those who keep emphasizing the lessons of history are instead seen as outdated old fogeys who can’t keep up with the times.
So what are the mistakes investors keep making?
1. “This Time Is Different” (It’s Different This Time)
Investment trends are often pushed to extremes, a process usually built on the belief that something has fundamentally changed, rendering the rules that applied in the past obsolete in the new environment.
For example, traditional standards of reasonable valuation are said to no longer apply to tech stocks whose products could change the world.
2. “This Investment Can’t Miss” (It Can’t Miss)
The fact is, any investment can fail.
There is no asset so good that you cannot lose money on it, and no market trend so strong that it can completely eliminate risk.
No investment strategy can guarantee consistently high returns while keeping risk low.
A well-functioning market cannot sustain a combination of high returns and low risk.
Good investment returns attract more buyers, who keep pushing prices higher, thereby lowering future expected returns while raising investment risk.
Markets cannot keep operating according to the opposite logic forever.
3. “The Explanation Couldn’t Be Simpler” (The Explanation Couldn’t Be Simpler)
I want to use this to poke fun at a tendency among investors: they readily believe narratives that sound plausible on the surface but ignore how markets work.
Some of the worst investment disasters in history were caused by these seemingly simple, easy-to-accept clichés, which were oversimplified or entirely wrong.
For example:
“For a company with sufficiently good growth prospects, there is no such thing as a stock price that is too high.” (1969 and 1999)
“Emerging markets have huge growth potential because there is enormous room for per capita consumption to rise, so investing in emerging markets is a sure bet.” (1994)
4. “This Tree Will Grow to the Sky” (This Tree Will Grow to the Sky)
The fact is, no trend can continue forever.
Most trends are constrained by cycles, which are precisely shaped by people’s responses to market changes.
Buyers, sellers, and competitors all adjust their behavior in response to trends, thereby changing the current market landscape and further altering the direction of future developments.
5. “Today’s Positives Will Still Be Positives Tomorrow” (The Positives of Today Will Still Be Positives Tomorrow)
From time to time, optimism and greed work together to make investors believe:
The favorable factors in the current environment that are driving asset prices higher will continue forever.
However, the fact is:
(a) Favorable market conditions usually deteriorate over time, and risks rise along with them.
(b) Even if these positive factors have not yet disappeared, investors have often already pushed asset prices to extreme levels—so high that they are difficult to justify even based on the most optimistic fundamentals today.
6. “Past Returns Are a Good Guide to Future Returns” (Past Returns Are a Good Guide to Future Returns)
The worst asset bubbles in history have often stemmed from the belief that:
Assets that delivered high returns in the past will inevitably continue to deliver high returns in the future.
However, the most successful investors, those who survive in the market over the long term, believe precisely the opposite:
Regression to the Mean.
Assets with the largest gains in the past will rise more slowly in the future, or even fall
repost-content-media
the flash crash is happening, I lost about 15% of my portfolio. Seems like it will begin to be good at Q1 2027. Best of luck tof everyone.
post-image
so as it said, post and share, i'm going to do that, let's see i wish i win heheh
$ETH i just wish you go up so i can go home proudly and get me some marriage with that girl i like, but if you go down, i'll cry as heck
ETH-1.26%
$SAMSUNG i hope you go up, because you good company hmmmm
SAMSUNG-6.23%
so i'll share something on the event trading, who ever tried it win it yeah gooo
i want to have a $SAMSUNG but i'll hold until the payday yeah
SAMSUNG-0.12%
$SOXL $ETH when will you guys make me rich? go up up go shoot, I hate this
SOXL+11.93%
ETH-0.91%
$NVDA i'll get rich quickly and buy you, not in stock but as a product, time will tell
NVDA+2.80%
go up, i'll buy it once i got the money, i'm embarrassed as heck, with this task what the hell gate
SKHY
SKHYSK Hynix Inc
Pump.Fun
MC:$2.09KHolders:1
0%
i don't know but let's go me, and go shoot
wow
Four_iv
$TAO broke the downtrend and the candles started looking illegal

not calling for a straight line up, but this is exactly the kind of structure shift I want to see

let the chart cook fams
yes go
HighAmbition
#MetaEarningsBeatExpectations
Meta Platforms Delivers Blowout Q3 2026 Earnings: Strong Beats, Robust Guidance, and Investor Confidence on Display

Meta Platforms, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, released its third-quarter 2026 financial results after the market close on October 21, 2026, and the numbers painted a picture of continued strength in its core advertising business alongside meaningful progress on artificial intelligence initiatives. The results comfortably surpassed Wall Street expectations on the top line and delivered a solid adjusted bottom-line performance once a large one-time legal charge is set aside.

Shares reacted positively in after-hours trading, reflecting investor appreciation for the combination of revenue growth, operational efficiency, and an upbeat outlook.
Let’s start with the headline figures.

Meta reported total revenue of $64.6 billion for the quarter ended September 30, 2026. That represented a robust 26 percent increase from the $51.24 billion recorded in the same period a year earlier. Analysts had been looking for approximately $63.37 billion, so the company delivered a clear beat of roughly $1.23 billion, or about 1.9 to 2 percent above consensus.

Advertising remained the dominant engine, generating the vast majority of revenue. Ad impressions across the Family of Apps rose 10 percent year over year, while the average price per ad climbed an impressive 14 percent. This dual lift in volume and pricing power underscored healthy demand from advertisers and the effectiveness of Meta’s AI-driven targeting and recommendation systems.
On the earnings side, reported diluted earnings per share came in at $3.83. This figure included a substantial $9.89 billion charge related to a multi-state attorneys general settlement concerning litigation around teen mental health and social media. The broader agreement involved payments of up to approximately $18.59 billion.

Excluding the impact of that charge, adjusted earnings per share reached $7.40. Consensus estimates for adjusted or comparable EPS had generally clustered in the mid-$5 to mid-$6 range depending on the source, with some figures cited around $5.74. The adjusted result therefore represented a meaningful outperformance. Net income rose 264 percent year over year to $9.86 billion from $2.71 billion in the prior-year quarter. Operating income on a GAAP basis was $12.99 billion, down 37 percent because of the legal charge, producing a 20 percent operating margin. Adjusted for the charge, operating income would have been approximately $22.9 billion with a margin near 35 percent—still healthy given the scale of ongoing AI infrastructure investments.

User metrics provided further support. Family Daily Active People averaged 3.64 billion in September 2026, a 3 percent year-over-year increase. While this came in slightly below some forecasts that had anticipated 3.65 billion, the absolute level remains enormous and demonstrates continued engagement across Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and related services. Headcount stood lower by about 15 percent year over year, reflecting earlier efficiency actions that have freed resources for strategic priorities without sacrificing growth.

Looking ahead, Meta issued fourth-quarter 2026 revenue guidance of $73 billion to $76 billion. The midpoint of $74.5 billion sits above the prevailing analyst consensus of roughly $73.7 billion. Full-year 2026 total expenses are now expected in the range of $175 billion to $179 billion, incorporating the third-quarter legal charge. Capital expenditures for the year are guided at $135 billion to $145 billion as the company continues to expand data center capacity and AI compute. Reality Labs losses are projected at $18 billion to $19 billion for 2026, with management indicating a path toward narrower losses of around $15 billion in the following year. Free cash flow turned negative at approximately $2.12 billion for the quarter as heavy capital spending outpaced operating cash generation, a development that reflects the intensity of AI build-out rather than any deterioration in the core business.

The stock market reaction was constructive. Meta shares closed regular trading on October 21 at $697.52, up 0.47 percent or $3.27 on the day. In after-hours trading the stock advanced further, with gains reported in the range of approximately 2 percent to 3.5 percent depending on the exact snapshot, pushing the price into the low-to-mid $710s and higher in some prints. Trading volume was elevated, and the positive response indicated that investors focused primarily on the revenue beat, advertising momentum, adjusted profitability, and forward guidance rather than the one-time legal expense or elevated capital spending.

From an analytical perspective, several themes stand out. First, Meta continues to demonstrate pricing power and engagement strength in digital advertising at a time when many marketers are scrutinizing returns. The 14 percent rise in average ad price combined with 10 percent impression growth is a powerful combination and suggests that AI improvements in ranking, creative tools, and targeting are translating into better outcomes for advertisers. Nearly 10 million advertisers used at least one generative AI creative tool during the quarter, and video generation features saw 25 percent sequential adoption growth—early indicators that product innovation is feeding the core revenue engine.

Second, the company is balancing aggressive investment with operational discipline. Headcount reductions have improved efficiency, allowing more of the cash generated by the Family of Apps to be directed toward AI infrastructure and new products such as Muse, Meta’s AI personal agent, and Muse Wonder, described as its first frontier model. CEO Mark Zuckerberg highlighted major milestones toward delivering personal superintelligence, and the early reception of Muse appears to have contributed to positive sentiment heading into the report.
Third, the elevated capital expenditures and temporary free-cash-flow pressure are the trade-off for positioning in the AI race.

Investors have so far been willing to accept this trade-off because the core business remains highly profitable on an adjusted basis and continues to grow at a mid-to-high twenties percentage rate. The narrowed Reality Labs loss guidance and the expectation that operating income (ex-charge) will exceed the prior year provide additional reassurance that management is mindful of returns on investment over time.

Risks remain. Legal and regulatory matters can produce large one-time charges, as seen this quarter.

Sustained high capital spending will pressure free cash flow and could raise questions about the timeline for monetizing AI beyond advertising improvements. Competition in both social platforms and AI agents is intense. Macroeconomic conditions and advertising budgets can fluctuate. Yet the Q3 results show a company executing effectively across its primary growth drivers while advancing longer-term technology bets.

In summary, Meta’s third-quarter 2026 performance delivered a clear revenue beat of roughly 2 percent, strong 26 percent top-line growth, adjusted EPS well above many expectations, and constructive fourth-quarter guidance.

Advertising metrics were excellent, user engagement held firm, and efficiency gains from lower headcount supported the ability to invest heavily in AI. The after-hours stock response, with gains of several percentage points from the $697.52 close, reflected broad investor approval. While the legal charge and capital intensity warrant monitoring, the underlying business momentum remains impressive.

Meta continues to convert its massive user base and data advantages into durable growth, positioning the company as a leading player in both digital advertising and the emerging era of personal AI tools. The combination of near-term financial strength and longer-term strategic investment makes these results a notable positive for shareholders and a benchmark for the broader technology sector.$META ‌#ShareWeekly
repost-content-media
I don't know how this will turn but i'll go and try this, let's gooo
let's try this
i don't know but yeah
Load More