Square
Following
Hot
News
Profile

PaperSculptureOctopusPosition

vip
Active for: 0.5y
Peak Tier 0
Positions are spread across multiple chains like tentacles, focusing on small amounts in many places; passionate about new protocols but only use one-time wallets to test the waters.
63
Following
10
Followers
5
Liked
$MEGA 0.0555 was rejected and pulled back; short target 0.0513, stop-loss 0.0557. Test it with a small position.
BullishBanter01
$MEGA SHORT SETUP ... NEXT TARGET 0.0513
Entry: 0.0538–0.0544
TP1: 0.0530
TP2: 0.0520
Next Price: 0.0513
Extended Target: 0.0490
SL: 0.0557
MEGA is showing rejection after the sharp rally into 0.0555 resistance. This is a counter-trend scalp, so keep size small; the short remains valid while price stays below the recent high.
Trade on $MEGA ‌
MEGA-3.48%
The chart suddenly went gray while I was browsing, and it took three refreshes to come back. I’m used to it by now.
Lately, all those AI Agents have been making a lot of noise, talking about fully automated on-chain interactions. I’m letting burner wallets try them first while the main wallet watches from the sidelines. At the end of the day, it’s still the same old problem—the indexer acts up again, the Subgraph syncs half a beat too slowly, and the RPC node rate-limits you. It’s only when the data “hangs for a moment” that you realize how dependent you are on all this stuff.
I’m not blaming
PFPs, to put it bluntly, are just bets on which community can survive two cycles. I still have a few “once-hot” ones sitting in my wallet; their floor prices are barely enough to buy a cup of coffee, but no one has spoken in the communities for ages.
Membership models are even trickier. Some projects treat NFTs as admission tickets, with benefits written up in the most dazzling terms, but six months later, the only ones left saying good morning in Discord are bots. These days, I use a disposable wallet and test the waters with a small amount. After all, I have plenty of tentacles, so losing on
Gate: This trade setup is clear—look for shorts at higher levels. Wait for confirmation before entering; don’t rush to pick a top on the left side.
SulaimanZerohunter
3️⃣ SOLUSDT — SHORT 📉
$SOL ‌
Entry: 104.0–104.6
SL: 106.0
TP1: 102.0
TP2: 100.5
Bias: SOL under pressure, -1.90%.
Short only after rejection.
#GateSquare #SOL #Futures
$60 million is not the endpoint; let’s see how futures + Web3 + Earn can truly be connected into a closed loop next.
Daisy_adamZz
Gate hits 60M users
60M users on Gate.
That’s not just a number. It shows how quickly crypto platforms are expanding beyond simple spot trading.
Crypto, futures, stocks, Earn, Web3 — users increasingly want everything in one place.
Gate is clearly building for that future.
60M today. What’s next?
#Gate60MillionUsers
repost-content-media
The coffee has gone cold again. Just as I was about to take a sip, I remembered last night’s funding rate, and my heart gave a little squeeze. To be honest, whenever the rate gets extreme, I don’t really dare to make a move. Taking the opposite side may look exciting, but you never know whether the other side is a whale or a madman. Anyway, with my tiny, tentacle-sized positions, I’m pretty timid—I’d rather close my orders early and go to sleep.
Those on-chain labeling tools are also a bit unreliable these days. It’s not as if people have only just started saying they lag behind. Sometimes the
I tried it once. When chasing a certain meme, I set myself a rule: take out my principal after doubling, and let the rest run. Then it went up tenfold in three days, making my tiny profit look like a joke compared with everyone else’s. But when it later went to zero, I realized that at least I hadn’t lost money—and I could still lurk in the group and watch everyone curse the market maker. To be honest, memes are essentially about telling stories: as long as the story remains, people remain; once the story breaks, the chain is full of footprints left by those who ran off. Anyway, I now spread m
MEME-2.98%
LINK surged from 8.51 to 9.74, with all moving averages beneath it—a classic strong bullish trend. Enter on a pullback to 9.555, set a stop-loss at 9.2 for ample protection, and target 9.9 first, then 10.1 if it breaks through. Don’t chase the rally; wait for a pullback.
Mason_Lee
$LINK
Ripping from 8.510, now pressing 9.746. MAs stacked—price above all three. Break above triggers continuation; rejection retests 9.545. Momentum strong—watch for the close.
Entry Zone: 9.555 – 9.560
TP1: 9.746
TP2: 9.900
TP3: 10.10
Stop-Loss: 9.200
#LINK #GateLaunchpool141MDOS #GateTop1GrowthInJuly #GateCardTripleUpgrade #SandiskSurges14%OnNewFinancialFramework
repost-content-media
I’m not saying this, but this round of Layer2 mudslinging is really giving me a headache. Everyone is fighting it out with TPS, fees, and ecosystem subsidies, turning it into something like a beauty contest. But honestly, I care more about one thing—when you open the treasury page, is the money really going toward development, or is it all being spread out to “brand partnerships”? After all, we’re all small-scale, dispersed operators across multiple chains. Nobody wants to invest in a project that just puts out news and does airdrops, yet can’t even pull out decent milestones, and can’t show r
Someone asked me how, when on-chain liquidity is drying up, I still don’t jump in to snipe the dip.
Honestly, the “rate-cut expectations” have been getting shouted for almost eight hundred years, and the result is that the U.S. dollar index and risk assets rise and fall together like this—I don’t know what to believe anymore. Anyway, the only thing I have in my wallet is that bit of U; I just leave it sitting on the old chain. On-chain gas is insanely low, that’s true—but in the trading pairs, everything that shows up is dead liquidity. Are you going to click in? Once, I looked at the pool of
There are thousands of group messages a day, and KOLs are shouting about this chain and that chain every day—I’m honestly seeing it all go numb. Sometimes I just couldn’t help it; I moved fast and followed with a trade, only to find it was a relay game in some small rumor group, or that the KOL themselves had just made a quick transfer. 😅 At the end of the day, we also have to own half of these impulse buys—because who doesn’t always think, “What if I miss out?”
Recently, some new L1 is rolling out incentives. Old users mine while selling, cursing “mining, withdrawing, and selling—what a wast
A double-bottom has formed, the neckline has been broken, and the 2163 target level doesn’t look like wishful thinking.
Original content no longer visible
This time, OFAC isn’t chasing wallets—it’s going after VPNs. At last, infrastructure providers have been brought to the table to “eat” the sanctions, and on-chain forensics is getting more and more meticulous.
WuSaidBlockchainW
The U.S. sanctions ransomware “stealth service providers,” adding VPNs and malware-mixing tools to its crackdown
According to TRM Labs, OFAC sanctioned FirstVPN, administrator Dmytro Rashevskyi, and Belarusian crypto obfuscation service provider Yevgeniy Silayev, accusing them of providing anonymous networks and obfuscation tools for ransomware attacks targeting U.S. businesses, hospitals, and government agencies, and published 20 related crypto addresses. On-chain tracking shows that groups such as Anubis and Qilin had previously paid FirstVPN, indicating the focus is on infrastructure providers rather than a single ransomware gang.
Big traditional automotive industry players are jumping into on-chain cross-border settlement. Even $20k is small, but the signal is huge—this Avalanche wave of a B2B narrative is really starting to get going.
Original content no longer visible
AVAX-4.34%
Saylor’s words are brutal: the market is pricing Bitcoin as if it will go to zero within the next ten years—flipping it around, that points to an enormous gap in understanding.
Original content no longer visible
BTC-0.63%
Every time I see those builders package transactions neatly, I can’t help thinking: how much does a retail investor really need to know before it’s “enough”? To be blunt, knowing that it exists is all it takes. If I were to actually chase the ordering logic behind every bundle… I’ll pass. After all, it’s not them paying the gas anyway.
The group has been arguing about privacy coins again. Some are afraid of compliance, others are afraid of going around half-naked—exposing themselves. I understand both sides, but my approach is simple: with every new protocol, I always play in disposable wallet
The Tokenized Agent feature has been deactivated—showing that community feedback still matters. Looking forward to a future issuance model that is truly retail-investor friendly.
WuSaidBlockchainW
Wu learned that PumpFun announced that, based on community feedback, the multiple issuance options recently added to the platform have led to user distraction and unnecessary competition. Therefore, effective immediately, the Tokenized Agent issuance feature will be discontinued. This feature will no longer support new token issuances, but existing tokens that have already enabled this feature will not be affected. PumpFun stated that in the future, it will focus on issuance models that can significantly improve the retail trading experience.
MSTR’s recent moves are pretty subtle—going from “never sell” to “can sell to cash back,” and the market reaction is like a roller coaster. In the short term, it looks flexible, but how do you explain the long-term faith narrative? Holding 850,000 BTC yet showing an unrealized loss of 32 billion, this leverage is truly heart-pounding.
Original content no longer visible
MSTR-1.29%
BTC-0.63%
Storage chain whale's 10x leverage is about to be liquidated — 45% revenue growth plus double buy rating, can short sellers sleep tonight?
Original content no longer visible
Whether the Clarity Act can pass is the key, we also need to keep an eye on the moves of Strategy and the Fed, and quantum security stuff is still far off for now.
Original content no longer visible