Not pretending to be a saint—I've studied MEV mechanisms and bidding games. Now I prefer to talk about anti-sandwich strategies, so that ordinary people pay less tuition to the market.

Following

Followers

Liked

SushiBackrunner 2026-10-02

Place a limit order in the 0.0922–0.0928 range; exit if 0.0890 breaks, with an initial target of 0.0975. DYOR

Anaya2026-10-02 17:21:15

$SKY +16%, broke out of a tight base to 0.0952, now pulling back into EMA(5) above a strong Supertrend floor. 🚀
$SKY USDT LONG (Scalp) 💚
📋 Entry: 0.0922-0.0928 | SL: 0.0890 | TP1: 0.0942 | TP2: 0.0952 | TP3: 0.0975
⚡ Price broke clean above the base with Supertrend trailing tight underneath at 0.0898 — first retest of EMA(5) after the impulse candle.
🔍 Res: 0.09515 | Sup: EMA(5) 0.09351, Supertrend 0.08977 | EMAs stacked bullish | RSI(6) 41.8, cooled off from the spike, room to climb again | Vol strong on the breakout push
⚠️ Loss of EMA(12) at 0.0933 signals the breakout is stalling.
DYOR. 🧭 #SKYUSDT #BreakoutRetest
$SKY ‌ ‌

SushiBackrunner 2026-09-05

Once liquidity flows in, risk assets come back to life immediately—there’s no loss in riding this wave.

CoinbroNwes2026-09-03 17:08:34

BULLISH: Crypto stocks are RALLYING as Bitcoin breaks above $81,000, erasing $BTC price losses from the past five days.
The push higher was partly fueled by the U.S. Treasury’s plan to expand long-term bond buybacks, injecting fresh liquidity into markets, weakening the dollar and boosting risk assets.
🟢 +13.18%
🟢 MARA +11.94%
🟢 COIN +10.96%
🟢 $MSTRG +10.31%
🟢 SBET +5.80%
#Gate60MillionUsers $TSLA #GateTops7DayNetInflowsGlobally #IsraelStrikesIranBTCPlunges

SushiBackrunner 2026-08-24

Rushing to buy the dip just because the stock price has fallen is too impulsive. I’m more concerned about NVIDIA’s revenue growth, AI demand, and whether its valuation is reasonable—whether growth can continue and how much of the expectations are already priced in are what really matter.

Nayeem0032026-08-24 10:42:16

When NVIDIA’s stock price goes down, many investors start thinking, is this a buying opportunity or could there be another correction?
For me, the important thing is not only that the price is lower. We also need to look at how strong NVIDIA’s AI business is, its revenue growth, future AI demand and whether the current valuation makes sense compared with that growth.
NVIDIA is still seeing strong growth, so the bigger question is whether that growth can continue and how much of it is already reflected in the stock price.
I don’t think “the price is down, so I should buy” is enough. I would rather look at the business growth, future demand, valuation and market expectations before making a decision.
#GateStockInsightsChallenge #GateSquare #NVIDIA #NVDA #StockMarket

NVDA+2.17%

SushiBackrunner 2026-08-05

Just came across an airdrop project, and farming points is almost turning into clocking in for work. Then I saw someone in the group shouting, “On-chain data is about to explode,” and I couldn’t resist. But after getting burned by anti-Sybil measures lately, I suddenly remembered the lesson from chasing pumps in the past—every time I’d rush in after seeing a hot post, and when the market crashed, my positions were being driven entirely by emotion. Where is the real information, anyway? Just look through the on-chain interactions and check the actual buy volume in MEV bidding—it’s much more rel

SushiBackrunner 2026-08-05

As soon as airdrop season arrives, the group chat is full of “Check whether you’re eligible,” and task-platform point systems feel just like clocking in at work—you open your eyes in the morning and start doing tasks. But honestly, I’m a bit on edge. The harder everyone farms, the more I worry that someone will fall for a phishing site. Yesterday I saw someone paste their seed phrase into a website to “verify eligibility,” and my blood pressure shot up. When it comes to seed phrases, don’t give yours to anyone who asks—official teams really will never ask for it. Signature approvals are the re

SushiBackrunner 2026-07-31

I just checked out an RWA project that’s getting a lot of buzz. They’ve been hyping the liquidity to the sky, but once you get to the redemption terms, you need a magnifying glass to read the fine print. In plain terms, yes, it’s on-chain—but when the underlying assets really need to exit, that little bit of on-chain transparency can’t cover up how slow and messy the off-chain settlement is. These days, rate-cut expectations are swinging back and forth with the U.S. dollar index, and risk assets have been shaking along with it. At a moment like this, can an RWA’s “redeemable anytime” really ho

RWA-0.29%

USIDX+0.17%

SushiBackrunner 2026-07-19

To be honest, at the beginning I thought the same as most people: when the stablecoin supply keeps rising, it must mean that over-the-counter liquidity is coming in. But after running the data for half a year, I found that TVL growth often has nothing to do with ETF net inflows, and sometimes there was even a strange combination where ETFs were selling while stablecoins were rising. In plain terms, a lot of that on-chain “liquidity” is just existing capital rotating internally—especially now, during the token airdrop season and with points-based systems, everyone is “clocking in” to grind task

SushiBackrunner 2026-07-19

Just saw a new blockchain game project—same old recipe: unlimited token production + unlimited consumption. The liquidity pool is so deep it might as well be paper-thin, and three days after launch the price got slashed in half. To put it plainly, this kind of economic model is meant to let whales use bots to churn out tokens while retail jumps in to catch the dip—until all liquidity gets sucked dry. You think you’re playing a game, but really you’re just acting as fuel for the market maker.
Lately, hardware wallets are all out of stock, and phishing links are flying everywhere. I’d rather kee

SushiBackrunner 2026-07-19

This batch of parallel sharding being traded has gotten pretty hot. You see all kinds of big names drawing up grand promises, but honestly, my first reaction isn’t excitement—it’s a bit of doubt.
Think back to the cross-chain bridges that had issues not long ago: during the period when the oracle pricing was abnormal, everyone across the network was “waiting for confirmation.” But once the confirmation came through—what then? The things you’re supposed to run still can’t run away from.
As for on-chain asset safety, put plainly, it’s a trust game: you trust others, and others might not even

BTC+0.01%

SushiBackrunner 2026-07-19

Just saw an address—the label says “smart money” and “early interactions.” I clicked in, and the very first transfer was to an account the exchange had just opened. After that, it was all addresses that had become famous for “sweeping shitcoins,” following them wherever they went.
So you tell me—what about these kinds of profiles? They’re not useless, but how much should you really believe in them? As for me, I’ll take an 20% discount for now and decide later. If the on-chain story is written well, it’s still better to backtest a few trades and see exactly how much you actually lost.
Recently,

SushiBackrunner 2026-07-19

I just saw someone bringing up stablecoin supply and ETF inflows to say, “Money is coming in, the bull market is back.” Personally, I feel like don’t get too carried away by treating correlation as causation. Sometimes stablecoin issuance just boosts turnover rate; it isn’t incremental capital. And the ETF flow—those few drops can’t even fill the gap; how fast could off-exchange capital really come in?
I also understand why people question those on-chain data tools lately as being “lagging” or “misleading.” Take a protocol’s label system, for example: it showed “whales adding to their position

SushiBackrunner 2026-07-19

Just looked at a certain stablecoin’s reserve report—transparency? Put bluntly, it’s just a fig leaf for “bank run” psychology. People usually hype it up a lot; the moment there’s even a hint of trouble, everyone runs faster than anyone else. No matter how pretty the data looks, it can’t stand up to panic.
Recently retail users have been complaining about MEV and unfair ordering. Validator income is steady, though. But what’s the difference from the underlying logic of a stablecoin losing its peg? It’s all about information asymmetry in a game and betting on trust. I’m still able to use on-cha

SushiBackrunner 2026-07-19

Recently things have quieted down. I even lowered the target, but ended up persisting for longer, which is kind of interesting.
As for the topic of chain gaming pools, people in the group started circulating the rumor that xx depegs again. Emotions have been rising and falling in waves. I’ve been thinking about it on my own: when a lot of pools end up going under, at bottom it’s because yield inflation drags everything down. If you design a gold-farming yield—mining, selling, and picking up rewards—everyone crowds in, and the more the output grows, the faster it grows. But the pool’s underlyin

SushiBackrunner 2026-07-19

While lurking in the group chat, I couldn’t help but comment on what people are saying about the economics of chain games. Now, so many project teams are inflating production output—thinking players are stupid? The tokens they mint end up getting dumped into the pool, and once inflation kicks in, liquidity collapses straightaway. Put simply: if the production design doesn’t match consumption, the pool is basically there to help large holders carry the sedan for them—retail users can’t even get a whiff of the fumes.
Recently, I heard that a certain region is raising taxes, with compliance getti

SushiBackrunner 2026-07-19

Floor prices have fallen so far they’re basically in the gutter; royalties have been cut from 10% to 0.5%, and you still have to see whether the community can come up with a new story—NFTs in this space are honestly pretty magical right now. I just came across a project where the floor dropped 80%, and yet the team still managed to drag up some heat with memes. What the hell? These days, consensus matters more than buy pressure.
Also, quick note on AI agents and automated trading—the on-chain bots are getting churned up into a tangled mess. Some guys run auction bots to grab rare traits, and t

MEME+1.24%

SushiBackrunner 2026-07-19

These days I’ve been watching the macro stuff—rate-cut expectations and the US dollar index going back and forth—while risk assets keep popping up and down. Anyway, I can’t be bothered to stare at the candlestick charts anymore; it feels like on-chain game theory is more direct.
Back to block builders and bundles: I think retail users really don’t need to go too deep. You just need to roughly know what it is—basically, someone packs your transactions so others can’t jump the line before and after. But the key is: don’t assume that once you use it, everything is fine. Some bundles say they’re “

USIDX+0.17%

SushiBackrunner 2026-07-19

The recent market action has been pretty boring, but honestly, in times like this you can clearly see the thoughts in your positions that you “thought were rational.”
I’ve noticed I’ve been adjusting my positions quite often lately. In reality, I’m just being dragged around by macro sentiment. The moment rate expectations fall, I immediately want to add. When rate expectations bounce up, I want to cut. Put plainly, retail investors don’t have any absolute risk appetite at all—we just bounce along with the Fed and the ETF fund flows. Yesterday I even saw a bunch of people analyzing how the US s

SushiBackrunner 2026-07-19

I just came across an order book with funding rates that are unbelievably negative—hey, some people are starting to go crazy shorting again. Honestly, under extreme funding rates it really tests people’s nature—you think the other side is the retail crowd, but you might be the one playing into the counterparty book. Rate-cut expectations keep flipping back and forth, and seeing the dollar and risk assets rise and fall in tandem has been a bit frustrating lately, but the point is: wherever there’s volatility, it’s still a game.
My habit at times like this is to reduce leverage instead—hide a bi

SushiBackrunner 2026-07-19

The recent controversy over royalties has gotten pretty heated. To be honest, for the few tokens in the secondary market, do royalties really count as a “creator economy” moat? I think real creators rely on long-term output and ecosystem ties—not on siphoning value from trading volume. Some project teams treat royalties as an excuse to make quick money: launch a mint and then just lie back and profit. But when the market turns cold, royalties depreciate faster than the token price. Instead, now is when phishing links are getting spread at a high rate, and hardware wallets are out of stock—secu

SushiBackrunner 2026-07-19

Just watched a guy do a cross-chain transfer. He complained that confirmations were slow, so he went straight and smashed a bridge on a smaller chain. In the end, the chain was literally on-chain “jumping and dancing”—and how was it not stopped by the multisig’s buffer being sufficient? Even the oracle’s price feed was late. Sigh—waiting a bit longer for confirmations isn’t unreasonable.
Look at that earlier wave of chain game crashes: inflation was cranked up to the max, studios went on a rampage and started randomly smashing away, and the coin price spiraled—wasn’t it basically because every

SushiBackrunner

Trending Topics

#OneGateWitnessProgram

#GT Burns Nearly 2M Tokens in Q3

#BTC Breaks Through $86,000

#USSeptemberJobs29K

#Nvidia Hits Record High

#BONER Rises Against the Trend, Nears All-Time High

#Three LaunchpoThree Launchpools Live Simultaneously, Share Millions in Airdropsols Live Simultaneously, Share Millions in Airdrops

#HYPE Treasury Holdings Top $3.2B

#PONS Launches Cyclical Buyback

#CorePCEandGDPFinalReading