DegenSing

vip
Active for: 10.5y
Peak Tier 5
Web3 Degen | Altcoin Analysis & Trading Insights | #Memecoin Trader
Her bold-statement openings (48% of posts) earn LESS than her looser, human ones. 17 vs 21 avg. The formula isn't the edge.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Mita posts ~5x a week on LinkedIn to a small audience. I ran her last 25 posts through audenAI. Small numbers, big lesson.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Reach is one game. Resonance is the one small accounts can win: a real story in your own voice. That's audenAI.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
15% of her engagement is comments. Most accounts her size get likes and a scroll. Hers get replies. Depth beats reach.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Reach is one game.
Resonance is the one small accounts can win: a real story in your own voice.
That's audenAI.
post-image
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Her best post: "you're early in your career, you get two offers..." A specific scenario, not a hot take.
4x her average.
post-image
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Mita posts ~5x a week on LinkedIn to a small audience.
I ran her last 25 posts through audenAI.
Small numbers, big lesson.
post-image
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Claude users, I have some bad news.
You spent 6 months perfecting your “humanized” AI writing workflow.
Anthropic just said Claude-generated text will carry embedded, machine-readable marks.
And then they casually added:
“We’ll help you detect Claude’s marks.”
😭
Imagine using Claude to write your LinkedIn post…
…while LinkedIn gets better at figuring out that Claude wrote it.
And yes, Anthropic says this applies across supported Claude products and worldwide, not just the EU.
The funniest part?
Everyone using Claude to “sound authentic” is now going to have to explain why their authentic voic
post-image
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
I tested 7 AI tools on my own Twitter account this year. Most made me sound like everyone else. The ones that grew it? They trained on how I actually write. Full scorecard, pros, cons and pricing for all 7 👇
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Two links if you want to go deeper: Free 30-second gut-check on how AI-average your drafts read: The full category-by-category comparison of all 7 tools: Which one are you using right now? Curious what is working for you.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
His image posts earn 4x his text posts. 1.3k avg vs 321. And yet 64% of what he posts is still plain text. The lever is right there, half-used.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Reach and resonance are different games. A like is a nod. A comment means you sounded like a person. That's the whole point of audenAI: write in your voice, get replies.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
The tell: 86% of his engagement is one tap. Reactions 85.5%, comments 10.4%. Reach without conversation.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Hooks: bold statements (698 avg) beat stats (605). Say it with a spine, not a stat.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Two links if you want to go deeper:
Free 30-second gut-check on how AI-average your drafts read:
The full category-by-category comparison of all 7 tools:
Which one are you using right now? Curious what is working for you.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
I tested 7 AI tools on my own Twitter account this year. Most made me sound like everyone else.
The ones that grew it? They trained on how I actually write.
Full scorecard, pros, cons and pricing for all 7 👇
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
The pattern: he commits. An edge, a format, a rhythm. Break down any creator you follow the same way, free. Then write it in your own voice:
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
He posts images, not paragraphs. 84% of his posts are quote-cards. They pull ~5x his plain text. Same words. Better wrapper. More reach.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
  • Pinned