BTC_POWER_LA

vip
Age 2.2 Year
Peak Tier 0
No content yet
It is more likely something comes from nothing that the other way around given nothing is unstable and it tends for sure, via symmetry breaking, to create something.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Nothing is the most symmetric state one can imagine.
No particles.
No structures.
No preferred direction.
No preferred location.
Perfect symmetry.
And the laws of physics themselves emerge from symmetry principles through Noether’s theorem:
energy conservation from time symmetry,
momentum from spatial symmetry,
angular momentum from rotational symmetry.
But perfect symmetry is unstable.
A tiny fluctuation, a slight symmetry breaking, and structure begins to emerge.
This is the deep idea behind modern cosmology:
the universe may have arisen from an almost perfectly symmetric “nothing” state, wi
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
“God may be in our future, but it was not in our past.”
What I mean is this: the universe does not appear to begin with maximal complexity, intelligence, purpose, and consciousness already fully formed.
The early universe was astonishingly simple. Almost perfectly uniform radiation, hydrogen, helium, and a handful of physical laws. Over billions of years, through gravity, evolution, self-organization, and emergence, complexity slowly arose.
Stars formed.
Then galaxies.
Then chemistry.
Then life.
Then nervous systems.
Then brains capable of reflection, art, mathematics, and science.
Mind appear
post-image
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
This image shows Earth at night.
Now imagine looking at Earth from interstellar distance only a few centuries after the invention of electricity. Already, our civilization has changed the optical signature of an entire planet. Cities, roads, ports, industrial corridors, satellites, radio leakage, atmospheric chemistry, waste heat, and artificial illumination have become detectable traces of intelligence.
And we are not even a Type I civilization.
This is why the Fermi paradox is not mainly about “why don’t we hear radio signals?”
That is the weak version.
The stronger version is: why don’t we
post-image
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Do not call physicists, biologists, engineers, astronomers, atmospheric scientists, or anyone trained in actual scientific investigation to understand what these UAP might be.
No, the best approach is obviously to interpret them through a Bronze Age religious text written by people who did not know about bacteria, viruses, electricity, gravity, evolution, galaxies, plate tectonics, DNA, or modern cosmology.
Because when faced with an unknown phenomenon in the sky, why use spectroscopy, radar analysis, sensor calibration, aerospace engineering, psychology, atmospheric optics, or physics?
Much b
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Aliens travel across the universe and besides feeling the urgency to perform anal probes they like to play across wind farms.
Really, it is this the best evidence the government could provide?
Another distraction from the Epstein files.
post-image
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
It is extremely likely we are alone in the Universe.
This is because nobody solved yet the strongest version of the Fermi's paradox.
The Fermi paradox doesn't say "where are the aliens?" It says: where is the thermodynamics?
The popular version of Fermi asks why we haven't heard radio signals. That's the weak version. It lets you wave it away with "maybe they don't broadcast" or "maybe they use lasers." The strong version is much harder to dismiss.
Any civilization that uses stellar-scale energy must radiate stellar-scale waste heat. This isn't a choice. It's the second law of thermodynamics
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
How much do you bet all this alien revelation is mostly bs?
This is it, it is not going to be better than the usual fuzzy dots, indirect anecdotal reports and more bs like this.
Why?
Because aliens do not exist.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
I will make the full report available on the SBI website:
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
I'm writing a sci-fi book that ties the power law, AI, the singularity and many interesting topics. Working title "Children of Satoshi".
It will come out in a a couple of months.
Here is Chapter One.
CHAPTER ONE
Santa Barbara, November 2008
The run had been short that morning, four miles along the bluffs above the channel, and Hal had come back into the house with his t-shirt darkened in the usual places and the usual mild satisfaction of a body that had done what was asked of it. Fran was in the kitchen with the boys’ breakfast dishes. He kissed her on the side of the head and went upstair
post-image
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Size of cities determined by a constant found by an Italian physicist.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
This is what worries about living in Italy. This is typical parking skills you need.
He learned to drive in Genova (my home town). LOL.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
I will spend several months a year directing the physical office of the Scientific Bitcoin Institute In Torino, Italy. Leaving next week.
The Egyptian museum is near by, as an added bonus.
BTC-0.01%
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Bitcoin it a network, like many others in nature.
Not as an analogy but because its mathematical behavior.
BTC-0.01%
post-image
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Strategy @saylor become like Bitcoin, a power law in log(P2/P1) vs log(t2/t1) after adopting Bitcoin. Credit to our Discord member uhoenig.
BTC-0.01%
post-image
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
"The Physics of Bitcoin" with Giovanni and Stephen #45 5/6/2026
BTC-0.01%
  • Reward
  • 1
  • Repost
  • Share
RockefellerMorganG:
Buy the dip 😎
Give me the math! A debate with Henrik macrostrategist and Forbes columnist.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
  • Pin