#JensenHuangCouldFaceRemoval $NVDA $AMD

This story moved fast, so first a quick status check. As of Thursday morning, Nvidia’s board met late Wednesday on whether to remove Jensen Huang, according to reports, and no decision had been announced. The company’s last formal statement, from Sunday, said the board has confidence in him. Everything below is about price and governance, not about anyone’s personal life.

Question one, who actually decides?

The board has 11 directors, and all but Huang are independent. By the company’s bylaws a majority can remove the CEO with or without cause, and there is no board chair. There is one class of stock with one vote per share, and Huang owns about 3.6%. So he has influence but not control. Reports also say removing him as CEO would not take him off the board, and that no successor has been named. Bloomberg reported the board is working with an outside firm on possible replacements and is weighing an interim CEO, and some analysts have pointed to the CFO as the natural interim choice.

Question two, how many dollars are at stake?

The stock closed at 173.73 on Wednesday, then fell about 8.6% after hours to roughly 158.78. Reports say about $600 billion of market value has gone since Sunday. From Friday’s close at 187.49, that is a fall of about 15% by my math. At the current share count, each 5% move is about $190 billion. That is the cost of uncertainty alone, before any decision is made. One shareholder said the market is starting to price Nvidia without its founder as the likely outcome, not a tail risk. That is one investor’s view, not a fact.

Question three, what exactly would a departure change?

The chips, the customers and the backlog do not leave with one person. What could change is the narrative premium, which is the extra value investors pay because they trust one leader to steer the roadmap. A fund manager quoted in reports asked who would lead the technology roadmap long term, and that is the right question. One analyst called Huang not replaceable by interim executives. Another view is that the board may take a middle path, naming a clear second in command, discussing succession publicly and keeping him under closer supervision. I don’t know which it will be, and neither does anyone else yet.

What the chart shows

My Nvidia chart shows 158.66, which matches the after hours price. The only marked support is 158.18, just 0.3% below. RSI is about 22, which is deeply oversold. Above are Wednesday’s close at 173.73 (9.5% higher), Friday’s close at 187.49 (18.2% higher), then 194.41 (22.5% higher), 201.78 (27.2% higher) and 213.31 (34.4% higher). The top line on my chart is near 239, so price is about a third lower than that. The scandal week accounts for roughly a third of that fall by my math, and the AI selloff for the rest, so not all of this is about one person.

What would settle it

First, the board’s announcement itself, and whether it comes with a named interim leader and a clear succession plan. Second, earnings on November 17, the first scheduled chance for management to speak to investors. Third, any move from lawmakers, since some have called for him to step down and one has said he is prepared to subpoena.

My take: the market is pricing a possible leadership change, and I think the fall is large enough that an orderly outcome could bring a quick bounce toward Wednesday’s 173.73. A messy outcome, with no successor and an open fight, could be worse than a clean exit. I’m not trying to guess the decision. I’m watching 158.18 as the line, and whether the board gives clarity before earnings.

Not financial advice.

Do you think Nvidia’s value depends more on its founder or on its products? And would a clear succession plan calm the market more than keeping him in place?
‍#DailyStandouts #ShareWeekly #WCTCS9