#ShareWeekly #HowToPositionForAPullback
‍#ETH
When I carry my previous ETH assessment—based on the outlook around September 30—forward to the present, the result resembles the SHIB analysis but with a key difference: the base scenario for ETH remains intact, yet the breakout above $2,800 has not yet been confirmed. New data points to a picture regarding ETFs that is strong but more volatile.

1. What was the essence of my previous view?

My previous analytical framework rested on three levels:

* $2,800: Main resistance
* $3,000–$3,050: The subsequent zone if the price sustains itself above $2,800
* $2,600: The critical threshold for the bearish scenario
* $2,650: Intermediate support that must hold in the bullish scenario

Additionally, ETH’s approximately 60% rise in the third quarter and the $287.5 million in net inflows into US spot ETH ETFs over the five trading days leading up to September 29 were the fundamental pillars of the bullish thesis.

My most important assumption was as follows:

ETF demand + strong Q3 momentum + holding above $2,650 → $2,800 could be broken; if the breakout is confirmed, the $3,000 zone comes into play.

2. The outcome: $2,800 still could not be surpassed

My previous technical assessment was directly validated here.

At the end of September, ETH was hovering in the mid-$2,700 range, and the $2,750–$2,800 zone was still acting as a strong supply area. Around September 28, ETH was trading near the $2,675 level; despite approaching $2,800, it failed to decisively break through that zone. As for today, ETH is hovering around $2.7k, and current market news still identifies $2,800 as the key resistance level.

My previous scenario

Outcome

Above $2,800 → $3,000–$3,050

Has not happened yet

$2,600–$2,800 consolidation

✅ Largely materialized

Below $2,600 → increased selling pressure
Not yet confirmed

Holding $2,650 Largely held

3. However, there has been a significant shift in my ETF narrative.

I need to update my previous view here.

ETF inflows were indeed strong up until September 29. However, they weakened thereafter.

ETH spot ETFs saw a net outflow of approximately $2.81 million on September 29, following a seven-day streak of inflows. On September 30, some datasets reported a net outflow of around $59.6 million. On October 1, Ether ETFs remained in negative territory, while Bitcoin ETFs recorded positive inflows.

This is a significant change.

In my previous analysis, I viewed the situation as follows:

ETF inflows = support for the price.

Now, a more accurate statement is:

ETF inflows remain a key source of support, but their sustainability has not yet been proven.

In other words, the institutional demand narrative hasn't vanished; however, it is no longer one-way—it has become fluid.

4. Does this invalidate my previous view?

No.

On the contrary, it highlights why the $2,800 level was particularly significant in my earlier analysis.

If ETH cannot hold above $2,800 despite strong ETF inflows, it suggests the market is facing substantial supply in this zone.

Now, the more interesting question is:

Will ETH be able to break past $2,800 when ETF inflows regain momentum?

I believe this is the key test to watch right now.

Because if a second wave of strong ETF inflows arrives and the price remains in the $2,700 range, it could indicate that the supply at the $2,800 level is stronger than we anticipated. Conversely, if ETF inflows accelerate again and ETH simultaneously breaks past $2,800 on high volume, the previous $3,000–$3,050 scenario regains momentum.

5. New development: Ethereum’s Glamsterdam upgrade

Here, there is a new catalyst that was not included in my previous analysis.

The testnet activation for Ethereum’s Glamsterdam upgrade is scheduled for October 6, 2026. However, the mainnet activation date has not yet been finalized.

Therefore, it is more prudent to view this as a medium-term fundamental catalyst rather than an immediate price catalyst.

Especially during the testnet phase,

a chain reaction of: upgrade anticipation → interest in the Ethereum ecosystem → demand for ETH

could emerge.

However, testnet activation itself does not automatically imply a price increase. The extent to which the market has priced this in must also be monitored.

6. Macro factors are now more significant

It is not just ETF flows that are causing me to be more cautious regarding ETH compared to my previous analysis.

The US 10-year Treasury yield recently climbed to around 5.3%, and the bond market experienced significant volatility. This situation is crucial for the valuation of high-risk assets.

On the other hand, softer inflation data from October 2nd dampened expectations for aggressive tightening in the near term. However, it cannot be said that the core inflation issue has been fully resolved.

Therefore, the outlook for ETH is as follows:

Positive:

* Strong Q3 performance
* Resurgence of institutional demand via ETFs
* Ethereum upgrade catalyst
* Recovery in the broader crypto market

Risks:

* Failure to break the $2,800 resistance level
* ETF flows turning negative again
* High bond yields
* Geopolitical risks and fluctuations in risk appetite

7. My previous $2,600 scenario is not yet off the table

I believe this is one of the most important points here.

ETH has not shifted to a bearish scenario simply because it failed to break the $2,800 level.

This is because the critical risk level in my previous framework was $2,600.

In the current news cycle, the $2,550–$2,600 zone continues to be monitored as a critical downside support level. Therefore:

Above $2,600 → consolidation thesis

Above $2,800 → breakout thesis

Below $2,600 → the framework regarding the invalidation of my previous balanced scenario remains applicable.

8. So, what is my updated view?

I am not completely changing my previous stance, but I am tempering my bullish confidence due to the ETF data.

I am currently evaluating ETH in three stages:

A) Up to $2,800

This remains a test of resistance.

ETH approaching the $2,750–$2,800 zone does not, in itself, signal a bullish breakout. It could face rejection, just as it did in previous attempts. Current market analyses also monitor this zone as a key supply area.

B) Above $2,800

The assessment changes here.

Specifically: if a daily close, rising spot volume, and positive ETF inflows are observed simultaneously, the previous $3,000–$3,050 zone becomes technically significant once again.

Sustained price action—not just a wick—is what matters here.

C) Below $2,600

This would represent a much more significant shift.

Because in that scenario, the consolidation thesis built upon the Q3 recovery would weaken, and the previous bearish scenario would come into play.

9. Which part of my previous prediction was correct?

In my opinion, the most successful aspect was selecting $2,800 as the pivotal level. Because in the intervening period:

* ETH approached $2,800,
* resistance held firm,
* the move to $3,000 did not materialize,
* the price remained in the $2,600–$2,800 range,
* ETF inflows started strong but subsequently fluctuated.

Therefore, the logic in my previous analysis—"if $2,800 breaks, then $3,000" rather than "straight to $3,000"—proved to be the correct conditional approach.

The deviation stemmed not from an incorrect prediction, but from the fact that ETF demand lacked the sustained momentum to push the price above $2,800.

10. The set of indicators I will monitor going forward

For ETH, it is now more valuable to look at the combination of price and flows, rather than just price levels:

$2,800 + spot volume
→ indicates whether the breakout is genuine.

ETH ETF net flows
→ indicates whether institutional demand is regaining strength.

$2,650
→ intermediate support for the short-term structure.

$2,600
→ the main line of defense for the current consolidation thesis.

BTC’s behavior
→ essential for understanding whether an ETH breakout above $2,800 is supported by the broader market.

October 6 Glamsterdam testnet development
→ a new, Ethereum-specific catalyst.

US bond yields / Fed expectations
→ macro factors determining liquidity conditions, particularly for high-valuation risk assets.

Conclusion

My previous outlook on ETH has largely held true so far. The $2,800 level indeed proved to be the key resistance, and the scenario targeting the $3,000–$3,050 range was contingent upon sustaining a position above that level—a condition that has not yet been met.

However, there is now a significant update: the ETF narrative is no longer as overwhelmingly bullish as it once was. Following a streak of inflows in late September, we have seen outflows.

Therefore, the fundamental equation I am monitoring for the next move is:

ETH + break above $2,800 + positive ETF flows + strong spot volume = confirmation of a new rally

Conversely:

ETH below $2,600 + continued ETF outflows + weakening risk appetite = re-evaluation of the previous recovery thesis

For the time being, the most critical characteristic of ETH is that it has not yet chosen a direction. Consequently, it is more consistent to view any rally below $2,800 as a test of resistance rather than a breakout, and any decline above $2,600 as a test of consolidation rather than a breakdown of the trend.
$ETH

‌
$BTC