#EthereumAndBaseSplitOnAccountAbstraction

#EthereumAndBaseSplitOnAccountAbstraction

$ETH

📊 ETH is sitting around the $2.5K zone, but the more interesting story isn't only the chart.

Ethereum and Base developers are moving toward separate account-abstraction approaches after failing to fully align on their proposals.

For me, this isn't necessarily an “Ethereum vs Base” conflict.

It's a sign that different parts of the Ethereum ecosystem are increasingly optimizing for different priorities.

Ethereum: security, decentralization and censorship resistance.

Base: scalability, configurability and application flexibility.

The bigger question is whether this creates fragmentation or eventually leads to better specialized infrastructure.

📈 ETH price structure

ETH recently pushed toward $2,564 before entering consolidation.

Right now, the most important short-term zone for me is:

$2,500–$2,520

If ETH holds this area and breaks through $2,550–$2,565 with strong volume, I would watch:

🎯 $2,600
🎯 $2,700
🎯 $2,800
🎯 $3,000–$3,050

The $3K area would be especially important because it represents a major psychological and technical resistance zone.

🔥 Momentum confirmation

I don't want to trade ETH based on price alone.

My confirmation framework is simple:

Price + momentum + volume = stronger setup.

If the short-term EMAs continue supporting price and MACD momentum starts expanding again, another move toward $2,600–$2,700 becomes more interesting.

But if ETH remains stuck below resistance while momentum continues weakening, I would rather wait.

RSI around the neutral-to-bullish area also suggests there may still be room for momentum to expand, but I wouldn't treat RSI alone as a buy signal.

🟣 Volume is the key

A breakout above $2,550–$2,565 without convincing volume could easily become a fakeout.

What I want to see is:

Resistance breakout + rising volume + improving OBV = stronger bullish confirmation.

If price breaks resistance while volume and OBV fail to confirm, I would avoid chasing the candle.

⚠️ Account abstraction matters

Account abstraction is ultimately about making blockchain wallets more flexible and easier to use.

Ethereum has been developing this area through proposals such as EIP-7702 and EIP-4337, while the latest direction involves separate approaches from Ethereum and Base.

I don't see the split itself as automatically bearish.

If Ethereum focuses on stronger security and decentralization while Base prioritizes scalability and application flexibility, both approaches could potentially coexist.

🎯 My ETH trading plan

Bullish setup:

$2,500 holds
→ $2,550 breaks
→ $2,565 reclaimed
→ volume expands

Then I'm watching:

TP1: $2,600
TP2: $2,700
TP3: $2,800
Extended: $3,000–$3,050

⚠️ Risk levels:

Below $2,470 → short-term momentum weakens.

Around $2,405 → next downside area to watch.

Below $2,350–$2,360 → the broader bullish structure becomes seriously weakened.

🧠 My view

I'm not interested in shorting ETH simply because Ethereum and Base are taking different approaches to account abstraction.

From a fundamental perspective, the real question is whether this evolution makes Ethereum's ecosystem more flexible without sacrificing the security and decentralization that give ETH its long-term value.

From a trading perspective, though, I want confirmation.

$2,550–$2,565 breakout + volume = bullish

$2,500 support = key structure

Below $2,470 = momentum warning

Below $2,350–$2,360 = major structure damage

I would rather enter after confirmation than FOMO into a headline-driven move.

Price tells the story. Volume confirms it. Risk management decides whether the trade survives.

#Ethereum #Base #AccountAbstraction