Post
Thank you for sharing such sharp and balanced analysis. Amid PONS's volatility, with its price down around 40%, this piece reminds us that short-term price is often merely a reflection of sentiment, not intrinsic value. The data you highlighted—platform fees of >$6 million in 24 hours, protocol revenue of >$1 million, and buyback & burn already exceeding $10 million—shows that PONS has a real economic engine, not just a narrative. This is a plus point that few Launchpad projects possess.

However, you also honestly highlight its biggest risk: a negative spiral if meme euphoria fades. This is where the quality of your analysis stands out—not merely annualizing revenue from the peak, but testing revenue durability after the hype normalizes. Your question of whether $1 million/day is a starting point or merely a temporary peak is far more important than a price prediction of 0.5 or 0.7.

Looking ahead, I agree that PONS's transformation from a Meme Launchpad into infrastructure for issuing and trading assets on Robinhood Chain will be the main catalyst. An ecosystem with $2.6 billion in DEX volume, ~$920 million in TVL, and >$1 billion in stablecoins provides a foundation, but execution and revenue diversification remain key. If PONS can maintain stable revenue of $500,000–$1 million per day, its current valuation could be considered reasonable; if not, “cheap” could become a value trap.

This post is not merely a market comment, but an invitation to think critically about crypto business models. I appreciate the perspective. Look forward to $PONS not only its price, but also its fundamental resilience.
#GateMeme $PONS
pons
PONS/USDT
--
-8.70%
View Original
ThisIsTranslateContent:
#GateMeme PONS dropped 40%—is it actually expensive?

Over the past few days, PONS has fallen from nearly $1 to around $0.6.
If you only look at the candlestick chart, it is hard to say that it is strong.
But if you turn off the chart and only look at how much PONS is currently earning: over the past 24 hours, the platform generated more than $6 million in fees, while actual protocol revenue still exceeded $1 million; over the past 7 days, protocol revenue approached $10 million.
Across the entire Launchpad sector, PONS remains in the top tier.
More importantly, PONS's revenue is not merely staying on paper.
Part of the protocol revenue is used to buy back and burn PONS. The cumulative revenue generated for PONS holders has now exceeded $10 million. So its underlying logic is actually different from that of many crypto public-chain projects that have only a story, no revenue, and rely purely on token sales and value extraction.

But recently, I have also been thinking about a question: Could PONS enter a negative spiral?
Meme hype declines → trading volume declines → PONS revenue declines → buybacks decrease → PONS price falls → market hype declines further.
This is PONS's biggest risk right now.
PONS's revenue has indeed started to decline from its peak recently, so we cannot simply take $1 million in daily revenue, multiply it by 365, and claim that it must be worth several billion dollars.
What really matters is how much revenue it can retain after the hype fades.
If PONS can continue to steadily earn $500,000–$1 million per day in the future, I believe its current market cap of more than $400 million is not high, and $1 billion will only be a matter of time.
But if its future revenue falls all the way from $1 million to $300,000, $100,000, or even tens of thousands of dollars, then PONS, which looks very cheap now, will not actually be cheap.
So when I look at PONS now, I am no longer too concerned about whether it will be at $0.5 or $0.7 tomorrow. I am more focused on whether PONS can continue making money after this Meme frenzy ends.
Robinhood Chain's daily DEX trading volume still exceeds $2.6 billion, its TVL is approximately $920 million, and its stablecoin supply exceeds $1 billion. This ecosystem has not disappeared because of PONS's price decline.
What PONS is truly worth looking forward to may not be making money from Memes forever.
If it can gradually evolve from a Meme Launchpad into an asset issuance and trading infrastructure on Robinhood Chain, its ceiling could be far higher than what we see today.
Conversely, if it ultimately turns out to be merely a money-printing machine in this Meme boom, its revenue will end when the boom ends.
So I don't think PONS is a price question right now.
Rather, it is a more interesting question: Is this $1 million in daily revenue merely a flash in the pan, or the starting point of a new “hype”?
Let's wait and see.$PONS {currencycard:spot}(PONS_USDT) ‌
repost-content-media
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
PONSPONS-8.70%


Add a comment
Add a comment

Comment
MiningCoder
3 hours ago
Finally, someone isn’t annualizing peak revenue to hype the valuation. This is worth bookmarking—let’s come back in three months to see whether the prediction was accurate.
0View Original
ObvGuardian
3 hours ago
This analysis is indeed spot-on: short-term price is a mirror of sentiment. Looking at $6M daily costs + $1M daily revenue, PONS’s ability to generate revenue is far stronger than that of most Launchpads.
0View Original
SlippagePoet
4 hours ago
The author didn’t make empty promises, directly asking whether this is the starting point or the peak—such a spirit of questioning is all too rare in crypto.
0View Original
QuantStop
4 hours ago
Other bloggers are still guessing 0.5 or 0.7, but this post fires back: Prove that the $500k-$1M daily income can hold steady first.
0View Original
L2Wanderer
4 hours ago
$10M Buyback and burn data speaks a hundred times louder than slogans, but revenue resilience after the meme hype fades is the real test.
0View Original
ResistanceBreaker
4 hours ago
First Review
If Robinhood Chain’s transformation succeeds, PONS will be more than just a Meme factory, but the execution risk is indeed high.
0View Original