Post

$PI Ethereum’s approach is all about “wild growth”—it’s highly resilient, but ordinary people can easily get battered when they jump in.



Dr. Ni’s approach is all about “safety and stability,” but its drawback is also obvious: power is too centralized. The official team holds too much authority. While that makes things efficient, it also means innovation may be a little slower. Whether the ecosystem thrives or not all depends on whether the core team makes the right decisions.

At the end of the day, this isn’t really about “who is stronger.”
Ethereum and Solana are asking: “How can we make developers happy?”
Dr. Ni is asking: “How can we make ordinary people feel comfortable using it?”

They are all solving the same problem: how to bring Web3 from a small circle of geeks into the daily lives of ordinary people like us? What Dr. Ni is doing now is a particularly fascinating social experiment.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
PIPI-1.36%


Add a comment
Add a comment

Comment
h550880
2026-09-09
Put bluntly, the Pi project team lacks technical expertise. They are building it through trial and error, changing things when they don’t work. It’s an experimental product.
0View Original
GateUser-22d5fd2f
2026-09-09
The project team doesn’t work on holidays, doesn’t work when they’re in a bad mood, doesn’t work when times are bad, doesn’t work when it’s windy or raining, and doesn’t work when there’s something going on at home. They’ve been dragging their feet for seven years.
1View Original
View More
QianKunShuai
2026-09-09
First Review
Efficiency, my ass—what the hell have they accomplished after all these years!
0View Original