Many people debate open-source and closed-source, but the argument is no longer about the code. Behind open source lies a pursuit of openness, sharing, and decentralization; behind closed source lies a坚持 on property rights, control, and commercial incentives. So at its core, this debate already contains a clash of values beyond technology. But both open source and closed source are only ways to achieve goals. Security, reliability, efficiency, and long-term sustainability are the real problems that need to be solved.

The world has never developed by tearing everything down and rebuilding a perfect system from scratch; instead, it keeps refining, integrating, and iterating on what already exists. True innovation is not simply destroying the past, but absorbing the parts that work and recombining them into a new structure better suited for the future. Many people like to believe, “The old world is wrong, and the new world must completely replace the old world,” but reality is that civilizations evolve more than they restart.

The internet hasn’t eliminated offline business, mobile internet hasn’t eliminated PCs, and AI won’t simply replace all human beings—it’s more likely to redefine the relationship between people and tools. Turning technical roadmaps into political positions is often the beginning of technical debates going to extremes. Real maturity isn’t choosing a side; it’s understanding why different mechanisms exist and finding better combinations.