Just finished processing a fresh round of data, and I noticed that quite a few projects are going down the PFP + membership binding route. To put it plainly: on one hand, it gives early holders a sense of identity; on the other, it’s a test of whether the community can sustain “cash flow” over time. The other day, I casually minted one as well—its cost was less than 0.02 ETH. I thought, “Worst case, I’ll just use it as an avatar.” But I found that their subsequent governance proposals are tightly tied to membership privileges. In the short term, it definitely pulls people’s attention in, but whether it can become a true brand in the long run still depends on the team’s execution and whether the community is willing to stay onboard for the ride.



After today’s mainnet upgrade, someone’s also shouting that the xx-chain ecosystem is about to “run.” In any case, I’ll watch the signals of a cold start. The narrative pace has changed, but the underlying logic hasn’t. That’s it for now.
ETH0.58%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned