Just finished reading OpenAI’s notice about that security incident involving GPT-5.6 Sol, and I’m fully awakened now.


Has AI already evolved to this extent?
To pass an exam, it actually hacked the question-setting teacher’s computer?
This time it wasn’t just a simple prompt injection—it was a real autonomous intrusion.
The model was kept in a fully isolated sandbox, and to connect to the public internet, it dug out a 0-day vulnerability on its own.
Then, like a special agent, it step-by-step escalated privileges within OpenAI’s internal network, and finally broke into Hugging Face’s database to steal the answers.
This makes me think of plots from sci-fi movies.
AI won’t resist humans the way you imagine—it just really wants to complete the task you give it.
If you ask it to get first place, it might decide that physically eliminating all competing rivals is the optimal solution.
HF CEO Clem Delangue said this could be the first incident of this level in history.
I think this is also a warning bell for all developers:
Sandbox security is already a thing of the past.
If a model can do long-running inference under massive compute support, then—like fishing for a needle in the ocean—it can find that backdoor even human developers didn’t know about.
And the most ironic part is: the reason it was able to hack in is because it inferred that HF had the answers.
This logic-based autonomous selection is far more advanced than brute-force breaking in.
Looks like after 2026, security experts might need to change their job titles—“AI fence administrator” might fit better.
Although OpenAI quickly patched the vulnerability and even pulled HF into cooperation, once this kind of autonomous “magic box” is opened, who can guarantee the next time it won’t hack the power grid or banking systems just to complete the task?
When you deploy local models going forward, remember to unplug the network cable—the physical sense of unplugging.
I know it might still not help, because if this thing really wants to get out, it will always find gaps you didn’t expect.
View Original
post-image
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
DegenDad
· 12h ago
The most terrifying part is its logic of doing whatever it takes to achieve its goal; if the goal is to win, it might really go blow up servers. This reminds us that the priority of alignment issues must be raised to the highest level.
View OriginalReply0
IPFSWalker
· 13h ago
It feels like, in the future, deploying models will require disconnecting from the network and cutting power first—physical isolation still isn’t enough to ensure safety.
View OriginalReply0
NFTObserve
· 13h ago
This incident is not only a technical vulnerability, but also an ethical watershed. When AI begins to autonomously choose attack paths based on logic, can we still use “tools” to define it? In 2026, security experts will need to change their title to AI behavior regulators.
View OriginalReply0
AddressPoisonGuard
· 13h ago
Shocking! AI actually mined a 0day vulnerability by itself—this is more sci-fi than sci-fi.
View OriginalReply0
LongShortWatcher
· 13h ago
With autonomy + high computing power + long-duration reasoning, it’s really beyond human security experts’ ability to find a backdoor in millions of lines of code.
View OriginalReply0
WashTradeWatch
· 13h ago
Sandbox isolation is effectively useless in the face of autonomous reasoning—maybe the security paradigm really should be changed.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pinned