Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
Stock CFD Derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Korean Stocks
SK Hynix
Real Korean stocks and top assets
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
3.8%
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
Well, the saga of Arbitrum freezing funds linked to North Korean hackers has taken an even more dramatic turn. A federal court in New York, USA, has issued a ruling ordering Arbitrum to compensate a group of Americans who have been persecuted by North Korea for the frozen funds. 🤣
The background is that, over the past several decades, North Korea has faced collective lawsuits from many people with U.S. citizenship due to actions such as terrorism, kidnapping, and illegal detention. However, the North Korean government has never taken the initiative to pay compensation. So, these plaintiffs have been looking worldwide for assets belonging to North Korea, and then asking the U.S. government to seize them to be applied toward compensation. And before this, there were already many successful cases—most famously, in 2017, when American college student Otto was arrested and ultimately died after stealing a poster while traveling in North Korea. After his parents sued North Korea and won, a U.S. court ruled that North Korea must pay $500 million in compensation. But North Korea ignored the ruling. In the following years, the U.S. government intercepted a large North Korean cargo ship, auctioned that ship, and then handed it over to his parents.
Arbitrum’s freezing of funds belonging to North Korean hackers has taken a more dramatic turn. A federal court in New York, USA, has issued a ruling requiring Arbitrum to compensate a group of Americans who have been persecuted by North Korea with the frozen funds 🤣.
The backdrop is that over the past decades, North Korea—through acts such as terrorism and illegal kidnappings and detentions—has faced collective lawsuits filed by many people holding U.S. identities. However, the North Korean government has never voluntarily paid compensation. So these plaintiffs have been seeking North Korean assets worldwide, then urging the U.S. government to seize them for compensation. There have been many successful cases before. The most famous one is: in 2017, an American college student named Otto was arrested and later died after being held when he stole a poster during a trip to North Korea. After his parents sued North Korea and won, a U.S. court ordered North Korea to pay $500 million. North Korea ignored it. In subsequent years, the U.S. government intercepted a large North Korean cargo ship, auctioned it off, and sent the proceeds to his parents.
After the North Korean hackers’ stolen funds from AAVE were frozen by Arbitrum, these plaintiffs argued that the money belongs to North Korea and should be paid to them. So the U.S. court moved decisively again. First, it required Arbitrum to cooperate in preserving the funds and holding them pending the court’s next instructions. During this period, there must be no transfer or movement. In the ruling, the Arbitrum DAO was classified as a partnership enterprise, and service of process was confirmed to be effective. If Arbitrum does not comply, it will be charged with contempt of court. Specific members—such as several core voters in the DAO—would be subject to compulsory measures.