I just saw a post saying that a certain address “coincidentally” made a transfer, then paired it with “smart money” showing unusual movement—made me laugh so hard. I used to believe this too. When I saw a big transfer, I would get so excited that I couldn’t stop myself—I’d quickly screenshot it and send it to the group. But every time it turned out to be internal housekeeping from an exchange or a test by the project team. Ugh.



Now my mindset has changed, like a version update—from “following the herd like a rookie” to a “calm, detached observer.” Put simply, when you break down the so-called “coincidental” transfers, many of them are just two addresses passing tokens back and forth like left and right hands, or the middleware of a cross-chain bridge runs a round. Especially for someone like me who loves using cheap chains—I’m even more clear on this. Sometimes it’s just that I transferred to the wrong chain myself, and then it got exposed and treated as a signal.

Anyway, I’ve learned my lesson now. When I see unusual movement of a big amount, I check the related addresses first—don’t just blurt out “the big shot is coming in” at the drop of a hat. Impulse is the devil; fees are the real thing. Forget it—I’ll just keep being my little retail trader and save a bit on gas. That’s better than anything.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned