I just saw someone say that on-chain data transparency is a good thing, and I guess that’s true—but privacy, the boundaries really are pretty blurry. The recent staking unlock round stirred up quite a commotion; many people were staring at the calendar and anxious out of their minds. Put simply, once the data is transparent, others can also figure out your operational tempo. I ran into a case before: because the update frequency of the price feed source got stuck, the contract was almost exploited in reverse. No matter how strong the privacy protection is, if the oracle source at the root fails, it’s all for nothing. Ordinary users shouldn’t expect to be fully anonymous, but they do need to learn how to manage expectations—don’t treat on-chain openness as safety, and don’t use privacy as a fig leaf. We’ll talk again next time.