#USPPIComesInBelowExpectations

The Disinflation Trade Is Back But Warsh Isn't Celebrating Yet

June's PPI print just handed the market a reprieve. Whether it lasts depends on whether the Fed chair believes it.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics dropped a bomb on Tuesday morning, and for once, it wasn't the kind that sends traders scrambling for hedges. June's Producer Price Index clocked in at 5.5% year-over-year well south of the 6.2% consensus and a full half-point below May's downward-revised 6.0% reading. The month-over-month figure? A 0.3% drop, the steepest since April 2020 when the economy was still choking on lockdowns.

Gasoline led the charge lower, plunging 12% and accounting for roughly two-thirds of the goods decline. Strip out food and energy, and core PPI still surprised to the downside at 4.7% versus 5.2% expected. For an economy that's spent the better part of five years wrestling with inflation above target, this was the kind of release that makes you do a double-take.

The market reacted accordingly. Fed funds futures immediately repriced, with the probability of a July rate hike collapsing to single digits some pricing now shows sub-5% odds, down from north of 40% just days earlier. September hike probabilities have also retreated, sitting around 40-45% depending on which desk you ask. Risk assets caught a bid. Bitcoin reclaimed $65,000. Ethereum punched through $1,900 for the first time in six weeks.

But here's the thing about markets: they're desperate for a narrative, and right now they're clinging to this one like a life raft. The question is whether the Fed sees what traders see or whether they're looking at a different set of facts entirely.

Warsh's Warning: One Month Doesn't Mean "Mission Accomplished"

Enter Kevin Warsh. The Fed chair took his seat before the House Financial Services Committee on Tuesday with the PPI numbers still warm, and he didn't mince words. "One data point," he said flatly when asked about the morning's CPI print. "I don't overread or cherry-pick data."
Warsh has been on a mission since taking the chair dismantling the Fed's post-crisis habit of telegraphing every move months in advance. He's argued, convincingly, that forward guidance locks policymakers into positions before they have all the facts. "We're human," he told lawmakers. "If we were to give you my projection today about what we'll do when we meet in two weeks ... then we would find ourselves taking information that's consistent with our priors and rejecting information that's inconsistent."

Translation: the Fed isn't playing the prediction game anymore. Markets want clarity; Warsh is giving them ambiguity by design.

And then came the line that should give bulls pause: "There might be some that would look at this morning's data and say, 'Oh, mission accomplished. Everything is swell.' That is not my view."

Zero tolerance for persistent inflation. That's the Warsh doctrine. Sixty-three months above target has been "an unfair burden and a tax on the American people," he said. The Fed plans on getting rid of that tax. But the path there? That's still very much TBD.

The Crosscurrents: Oil, AI, and the Ghost of Sticky Inflation

If the inflation data was the headline, the subtext was just as interesting. Warsh flagged AI-related investment spending as a source of inflationary pressure corporate capex on data centers, chips, and infrastructure is running hot, and that's bleeding into input costs. Meanwhile, oil prices have been volatile, with Brent crude bouncing between $70 and $80 as Middle East tensions ebb and flow. The Fed's watching both.

Other officials have been more explicit about the trigger points. Fed Governor Christopher Waller said Monday that while inflation could drift back to 2% without further tightening, "there is still a credible" chance that upcoming data shows inflation remains elevated or accelerates again. If that happens, "tighter monetary policy" would be warranted potentially as soon as the July 28-29 meeting.

New York Fed President John Williams offered an even more concrete benchmark: if the Fed's preferred core inflation gauge consistently exceeds 0.2% month-over-month, expect a response.

So where does that leave us? The PPI print is undeniably good news. It's confirmation that the disinflationary forces of 2024-2025 haven't fully dissipated. Energy price relief is real. Supply chains have healed. The economy is cooling without breaking.

But the Fed's reaction function has shifted under Warsh. This isn't the Powell Fed of "transitory" fame, nor the Bernanke Fed of explicit forward guidance. This is a central bank that's tired of being boxed in by its own words, led by a chair who's seen what happens when markets price policy moves the Fed isn't ready to make.

The July meeting is live, but barely. Markets have all but ruled out a hike this month, and the data supports that view. But September? That's where the real uncertainty lies. If the next two inflation prints confirm June's cooling trend, the Fed can stand pat and let the economy glide toward 2%. If they don't—if oil spikes, if services inflation proves stickier than expected, if the AI capex boom feeds through to consumer prices—Warsh has made it clear he's not afraid to pull the trigger.

For investors, the playbook is shifting. The "higher for longer" trade is morphing into a "data-dependent" trade, which is code for: expect volatility. Bonds rallied on the PPI print, but the move felt tentative. Equities ripped, but the breadth was narrow. Crypto caught a tailwind, but it's still tethered to macro liquidity conditions.

The disinflation trade is back for now. But if you're betting on a dovish pivot, remember who you're betting against. Warsh didn't come to Washington to declare victory at the first sign of progress. He came to finish the job. And in his mind, that job isn't done yet.
‍#SummerCreationCamp

‍#Blockchain #CryptoEducation @Gate_Square