Just took a look on-chain and again saw that kind of “coincidence transfers” being treated like a miracle in the group. Honestly, there aren’t that many coincidences on-chain—most of the time it’s just that the paths weren’t cleanly broken down. Often it’s the same address pool passing it back and forth, or some intermediate step in contract interactions being overlooked. When you break it down, the paths are all traceable. Recently, that NFT royalty drama got pretty loud, and both sides have a point, but to put it bluntly: if liquidity in the secondary market is already thin, then no matter how high the royalties are, it doesn’t matter—it only pushes transaction costs higher. My own habit is: once I set a stop-loss or reminder, I end up too lazy to keep staring at it. Before setting it, I’d keep thinking, “What if it hits me and then immediately pulls away?” After setting it, I feel reassured: the rules are in place, and once it’s triggered, I’ll look at how to handle it. The same goes for on-chain—anything that can be explained isn’t magic. It’s just that the path hasn’t been properly dissected.