Lately, I’ve noticed that many projects’ proposals are pretty generous with rewards. Their TVL keeps climbing one after another, but when you look closely at the fine print on how power is distributed behind the scenes, it just feels a bit off. Some proposals are basically a blatant “dig up, then sell” route. Long-time users complain there’s no real novelty—people just claim, cash out, and run. In the end, whose chips are left behind is obvious to everyone. Before I vote, I’ll pause—maybe only five minutes—don’t rush to submit confirmation. I’ll flip through the proposal’s incentive distribution details and see what the big-lot holders are doing. To put it plainly, the power structure matters more than the numbers. Some people chase it because the APR is high, but in the long run, the rules hidden behind the proposals are the real foundation that governs everything. I’d rather move slowly than end up as that someone else uses as the base-lot “feed.” For now, that’s it—stop, hold, and don’t rush to vote; stopping can be a good thing sometimes.