Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
Stock CFD Derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Korean Stocks
SK Hynix
Real Korean stocks and top assets
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
3.8%
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
I just saw a post talking about the relationship between stablecoin supply and ETFs, saying that over-the-counter funds are coming in, so stablecoins are being issued/printed more. I clicked in and had a look—the data really looks good, but I can’t help feeling something’s off. What I mean is, the correlation looks pretty strong, but maybe everyone is simply betting on the same direction at the same time?
I’m also seeing the same kind of thing with RWA and on-chain yield products being dragged into the comparison lately: when there’s even a little movement on US Treasury yields, this side’s narrative tends to drift along with it.
I don’t know. In any case, I’m increasingly afraid to treat this kind of linear inference as a conclusion. The harder the structure, the softer the story—don’t let a pretty narrative make hard data just background filler. Better to look more at whether those NFT projects actually have real money running—cash flow is more reliable than capital flow.