I just saw a post about a cross-chain bridge talking about IBC, and my first reaction was to hit the pause button before thinking further.



Others think “cross-chain” just means clicking to send a transfer and waiting a few minutes for it to arrive. But in reality, don’t you have to trust the validator set’s state consistency, whether the relayer’s message passing is complete, and whether the light client’s verification logic has any loopholes… basically, every layer is a little black box.

With recent tightening of compliance, the channels for in-and-out funding have gotten narrower, which makes people even more sensitive to the trust model of these bridges. Anyway, every time I use IBC, I take extra looks at the other chain’s node distribution and how much data latency there is—otherwise I just don’t feel secure.

Not sure if it’s just me being too anxious, but being more process-controlled is better than panicking after something goes wrong. That’s it.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned