Hey, I just watched a few AI Agent demo videos interacting on-chain. It’s both hilarious and infuriating. The machines run lightning-fast, but once it comes to signing authorizations or sudden governance-type nodes, you still need a person to step in and personally shout, “Hold on.”

The time when a cross-chain bridge got exploited, the on-chain alerts were going off for half a day, and the Agent was still charging ahead according to its original strategy—luckily someone manually flipped it off.

That oracle abnormal pricing segment is even more classic. The machine assumes the “wait for confirmation” consensus and then just gets stuck there; on our side, we stay up late waiting to confirm whether it’s real or fake, and by the time everything is back to normal on price, it’s still waiting.

To put it plainly: an Agent can help you cut down on repetitive work, but when you actually run into abnormal data, community voting, or need to decide whether “this project is basically trying to self-destruct,” you still need a human to make the call.

It feels like it’s now basically: “robots run fast, and humans handle the stop.” That’s fine too—it saves me from staring at every transaction with a blank expression—but don’t expect it to fully cover everything for me. Otherwise, one day I might get taken to mine and not even know why.